MovieChat Forums > The Runaways (2010) Discussion > Gross way to start a movie.

Gross way to start a movie.


So disgusting.

Are we just trying to shock people here? Poor attempt at a beginning and a lame way to start a movie.

reply

No. I disagree. It drove home the point that Cherie was young and just starting to come into her own as a teenager.

"By all means move at a glacial pace. You know how that thrills me."

reply

<< No. I disagree. It drove home the point that Cherie was young and just starting to come into her own as a teenager. >>

Exactly.

Anyone who's shocked by this needs to grow the f@%k up. Dear god.

reply

I also disagree. It wasent gross or being used for shock value. It was showing just how young Cherie was in a raw realistic way.

~ Party at the Moon Tower.~

reply

I disagree. For starters, if you think a girl starting her period is disgusting, you're too immature to be watching this film in the first place. Even though at this point in Cherie Curie's life, she wasn't innocent, they wanted the fictional Cherie to be innocent, and this was a good representation of how innocent and naive she was. It also lets you know that this movie isn't filled with rainbows and butterflies. It can be crude and that's why it's got an R-rating.


It's like being inside a dream or something.. There's truth, but no logic.

reply

I thought it was a great start. The gross part is when that guy fingers her sister because she gave her panties to Cherie...and then rubs his hand on Cherie's head!

reply

" For starters, if you think a girl starting her period is disgusting, you're too immature to be watching this film in the first place." If you think that showing a girl starting her period graphically. Is a good representation of showing a young girls innocence your just as immature.

"If you want art, don't mess about with
movies. Buy a Picasso"

reply

Ignoring that I made that comment a year ago (exactly, might I add), it wasn't even graphic. It showed a drop of blood on the ground. And yes, a girl just starting her period can be a good representation of innocence. Just starting a period enters a girl into biologic womanhood, and until that moment, she was a child. Obviously, there are people who break the norm, but a lot of girls start losing their innocence after starting their period. Usually because the average first-period age is 12-13. Most 12-13 year olds aren't experienced. Obviously, Cherie was 15 or 16, but, still. We're led to believe that she was pretty naive at the beginning of the movie.

reply

I agree!!!! I'm female and I was SOOO disgusted by this and it made me feel uneasy about watching the movie. This scene wasn't at all relevant to anything in the movie, but had it been further into the movie, I think it would have definitely resonated better with the audience!

reply

exactly. these people saying it's OK are just trying to sound like cool, calm tough cookies who aren't fazed by anything.

I love Jesus AND Jesus-hating atheists and am 100% proud!

reply

Because a girl getting her first period is so horrible in an age with movies like Saw and Silence of The Lambs.

reply

You are really shocked over the beginning? You get shocked way too easily. LOL LMAO

reply

Exactly. There are viewers "shocked" by a scene referencing the teenage Cherie starting her period?? Have they ever read a typical coming of age novel, like the Judy Blume novels from the seventies in which such things are commonplace? I have no idea how old the oh-so-shocked poster is but being shocked by a scene referencing a girl starting her period (which is hardly graphic in the film -- we see her grabbing some paper towels and doing a quick "cleaning" gesture w/no nudity shown) seems just incredibly young and not very worldly. The whole point was to show how young Cherie was and I thought it worked well. People need to chill, seriously.

Also, grossed-out OP, don't ever watch Homeland, as Carrie does many things (and things involving paper towels) that will definitely shock you. Ordinary things that women do all the time of course during the course of life -- but still you probably should never watch it. Or the film Unfaithful either as Diane Lane does a few things with paper towels in that film that may shock you.

"Hearts and kidneys are tinker toys! I am talking about the central nervous system!"

reply

It's a good way to start the film, because it's how the book started. It isn't even a big part of the plot, it's not even a minute long and it's never mentioned again, if you're that bothered then fast forward it?

reply

Exactly. Imagine if the movie had begun with the rape; the OP would have probably had a heart attack!

reply

The opening scene to a film is most important, and even though (IMO) it isn't a great film, the opening gets our attention for sure.

reply

I agree. It's a mediocre film with some great scenes, including the opening, which I felt adequately set the tone for the rest of the film.

reply

Well first of all I've never dripped thickass red paint-like period blood in my LIFE. Ever. Those who actually do bleed from their vaginas could probably back up the notion that period blood isn't usually LIKE THAT. Isn't that thickness, texture, color, etc... and let's face it, unless you're buck naked at the heaviest of your flow, it certainly doesn't usually drip (especially when you're wearing underwear anyways).

Now would it have made way more sense to just show Cherie's leg with some brownish reddish substance dripping down (and leave out the paint like dripping?) Definitely.

But would that have been raw and *beep* up like Cherie's time with the Runaways? No.

reply

Some actual vaginal bleeders know that all women have different flows and textures to their menses. Also depends how old you are, if you've had children, or have any other gynecological, hormonal, or physiological issue that would determine thickness and texture of menstrual blood. Just so ya know, your vaginal bleeding doesn't make you an expert on how anyone else's vagina bleeds. Just sayin'.

reply

Get over yourself already. Doh!

reply