MovieChat Forums > The Runaways (2010) Discussion > Did Rush really bully the girls?

Did Rush really bully the girls?


In the DVD commentary Joan Jett claims it was Rush who bullied the band during a sound check.

reply

[deleted]

Issa, interesting info on that story. I had no idea if true or not, but being likely true, it's all the more intriguing.

reply

Urinating on a Les Paul guitar isn't going to ruin it. I'm incredulous that you think that made any member of Rush respect Joan Jett.

reply

if grown men actually did bully a bunch of 16 year old girls their respect is worth less than that urine. which by the way does ruin a guitar, rock stars have no clue how to clean anything

reply

[deleted]

Actually that would have been a Nitro finish guitar and while the pups and pots wouldn't be too happy the acid in urine could easily ruin the finish of an old Paul....It's been a while since I saw this movie but from the movie I thought I remembered it being a double neck Ric (which would be accurate for Alex at the time) not a Les Paul.... Either way, still playable, fixable, probable finish discoloration...Also cloth covered wiring might be an issue... I've never had to fix an axe that was pissed on but lots that just got wet... Interesting thought though..

Don't count on hell ever running out of room

reply

i'm just being a smartass stereotyping rockstars, they're so rich that everything is disposable. What is the purpose of this alien apparatus you call a bath tub

reply

Peeing on a guitar made them respect her?

How would that even make sense?

I love Jesus AND Jesus-hating atheists and am 100% proud!

reply

[deleted]

Exactly! They weren't bullied because they were girls, they were bullied because they were absolutely TERRIBLE.

reply

whether they were terrible or not The Runaways were the only band at the time that could literally identify with much of the teen crowd. Makes a lot of sense to me that'd it'd be worth a shot. If anything is worthy of shame it's grown ass men being snobby twats to kids, who probably looked up to them with a lot of respect before the alleged shenanigans.

reply

Agree.... It had nothing to do with getting respect. They were just young, impulsive and pissed... Pretty simple motive really.... Wasn't some kind of grand statement...

Don't count on hell ever running out of room

reply

They weren't disrespected because they were an all-girl band, they were disrespected because they sucked so badly.

reply

I do love the Runaways, but also agree that the pioneering All-female bands were better; Fanny, Birtha and Isis.

As I posted on another thread here, a terrible review of hard-rockin' Birtha's first LP, from a rock critic (from the 1970's) was: "This could all be rationalized by some eager feminist theorist--women have never played macho rock before, but it would still be lousy music."

Ahh, the '70s and feminism (right?), but this would be unheard of today for someone to make such a comment about women playing "macho rock." Birtha, in my opinion, did a killer version of Ike Turner's "Too Much Woman (for a Henpecked Man)..and then their classic "Free Spirit." The ladies were Good, despite this music critic's comments.

Not all of the all-female bands back then were no-talents!

I do agree that The Runaways were probably not the best example.


"You Are a Testimony to Witlessness!"...Madalyn Murray O'Hair

reply

I remember the Wilson sisters from Heart as the first really good female rockers. I refer to the pre-MTV Heart, which made some really good music, eventhough they weren't an all female band. The Wilson sisters really were the stars of the band. They were really popular when I was in High School, and I got to see them in concert circa 1978. They were really tight, talented musicians.

Of course, they totally sold out in the 80s and made a bunch of crappy, soft pop, MTV videos.

reply

The Wilson sisters might have been great musicians but it doesn't mean they were saved from sexism by it.
A publicity campaign by a record company early in their career attempted to play up a lezbo angle between the sisters, much to their horror. One of the sisters recalled in an interview about being asked once in the 70s where her lover was? She was puzzled as to why she was being asked about her boyfriend until the asker slyly chuckled and indicated he was actually asking about her sister.

Just the same, they knew that if a little T&A sold vinyl, they weren't opposed to soft-focus album covers & capitalizing on their looks.

reply

I agree. While female rock musicians have undeniably had to deal with sexism no matter how talented they are, it was clear that in this case, it had nothing to with sexism. They were made fun of because they were marketed in a certain way, made to appeal to a teenage/high school audience. Rush would have felt the same way about those 80s glam bands, guys like Poison and Ratt would have been disrespected/not taken seriously by them too, simply because of the completely different styles of music represented by these bands.

It's like that time in the 80s when Queensryche was billed with Ratt on a tour. I can imagine Queensryche weren't happy about it, as they thought of their music as completely different, not the superficial sex-drugs-party of the glam bands they had to tour with and be compared to. Also, it was clearly shown that their qualm with the Runaways was not because the Runaways happened to be girls, but rather because they were just kids.

Hence, the lines mocking them about child protective services and telling them they should be doing their homework. They were made fun of because they were kids, and because of what type of band Rush perceived them to be (teeny boppers), which was completely different from how Rush perceived themselves.

reply

I actually have to disagree with a few things that were said above. First off I knew and know the guys in Queensryche, especially Eddie Jackson and they didn't mind touring with Ratt at all. They actually liked them, except maybe Tate, he didn't like anyone.

Second, Rush made derogatory comments aimed at the girls "opening their legs" and most all bands judged any female in rock badly at that time. Rock music was a man's world then, they considered them groupies, that's about it. I doubt they had even heard them play prior to that sound check and they didn't hear much.

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man....

reply

They weren't exactly bullied. Rush supposedly laughed at them during a sound check. Not to in any way excuse what they did but to call that bullying diminishes the term for those of us who actually were bullied.

Oh, and Rush were supposedly harassed by Aerosmith when they were starting out. It happens.

reply

EXACTLY.... It does happen... To almost every working band, we all got crapped on... Yeah I remember talking in Jr High in 79 or 80 about girl singers, not even bands and all we could come up with was Heart much less an all girl band. And I grew up and live in Seattle.. Where Ann and Nancy are from. We were typical Rocker guys so I know it had to be hard for girls. Being in music for a while now I have respect for MANY female rockers... There are some bad ass female musicians out there... Not so much then..

Don't count on hell ever running out of room

reply

In the commentary, she does specify it wasn't the band itself but their crew, their roadies who did the bullying.

__________________________
1up-games.com Last watched: imdb.to/K4tvL9

reply

I was kinda surprised when Jett said Rush were the bullies. Thanks for clearing that up. Rush just don't seem like the kind of guys who would "bully" anyone.

Whether Rush considered The Runaways terrible musicians or not, they seem like they would at least have respected their attempts. Any documentaries and interviews with Rush make them out to be the shyest men in the business. They said the the band UFO used to make fun of them because they just stayed in their hotel room watching TV while everyone else was out partying...

The reason The Runaways were on tour with Rush probably had more to do with the fact that they were both signed to Mercury Records at the time...

reply

The reason The Runaways were on tour with Rush probably had more to do with the fact that they were both signed to Mercury Records at the time...


Exactly.

They only did two shows with Rush. Feb. 9 in Saginaw, MI and Feb. 10 at Cobo Arena in Detroit, MI.

Here is a link to an article about the show on Feb. 10 showcasing three Mercury artists (Max Webster being the other) with most of the Mercury executives in attendance.

http://www.2112.net/powerwindows/tours/770210collage.htm

Redhooks

"You don't get something for nothing, you don't get freedom for free." Neil Peart

reply

Well honestly Rush must of thought they were a joke, and if we we're all serious with ourselves, for the most part The Runaways were a joke. Controversy was their real product. Sure Joan and even some of the others may have had some serious ideas for the band, but really they were formed as a gimmick and they were mostly a gimmick, I bet even Joan would admit to that. Hey, the Sex Pistols were formed as a gimmick too, but they still made one of the most influential albums of all time. I'm not saying The Runaways were all bad, but they were just young girls who really didn't know much of anything at that time with the exception of Joan, (And even she was just beginning to learn and develop as a musician and as a person.). In terms of musicianship and even their look, Rush must have felt pretty insulted having them as their opening band.


My body's a cage, it's been used and abused...and I...LIKE IT!!

reply

@The Animal Mother


The Runaways were a joke.


Why were they a joke---just because they were young teen girls? The Sex Pistols were known for not being able to play worth a damn at first, either---they were considered something of a joke themselves (and barely out of their teens when they made their only album)----they also say that they were already an actual band before Malcolm McLaren (their manager) discovered them. I have a CD by the Runaways, and they actually had some pretty good songs on it. I mean,let's face it---if they were teen boys, they would have been taken a lot more seriously, and appreciated a lot more. Heck, most rock bands started out not being all that anyway, but eventually became something better---like the Runaways did.

reply

The Runaways really weren't taken seriously, and if they were teen guys at that time, then they probably would have been taken even less seriously in my view. Yes, the Runaways were a gimmick, but as I said and perhaps you missed it the first time, they were also not all bad. The question here by the way was about Rush and how they related to the Runaways.

"but eventually became something better---like the Runaways did."

The Runaways didn't even last much longer than 3 years. There was very little growth as a band, if they were even capable of such a thing. For the most part, nobody in North America or Europe even knew they existed. No sales, no radio play, nothing. They were a one hit wonder in Japan, that's it. Other than that they were a live sales gimmick. That's the reality of it. Being able to play technically has never been a priority when it comes to punk. The Sex Pistols were a marketing gimmick as well, yes, however they had something no other band had before them, a fierce and brutal honesty and they wanted to shove it in everyone's faces. The band even used their own gimmick against themselves. Bollocks is usually listed as one of the top 25 most influential albums in rock history by every rock publication their is, or at the very least in the top 50. There is a humungous difference between the two bands. The Runaways were a short lived blip in music history which few people even noticed. The Sex Pistols made a landmark album which has influenced practically every major rock act since their time. Even many hip hop acts as well. Truly, if their was no Sex Pistols, there would be no such thing as NWA or Rage Against The Machine. For the most part the Runaways were only heard of because of what Joan went on to do a while later in her career. If their was no Joan Jett after The Runaways, almost NOBODY in the world would even recall The Runaways at all. Meanwhile much of the world still loves the Pistols and what they represented, and the ones who never liked them still wish that they could forget them. Their impression on music history is grand and will never go away. So really it's a terrible comparrison, but hey, I was trying to be nice and give The Runaways a little credit at least. Now that you opened up this can of worms though, they really look much worse, don't they? Oh well. The Runaways were okay in my view. However next to Rush or the Pistols, they're nothing but a drop of piss in the bucket of music history.


My body's a cage, it's been used and abused...and I...LIKE IT!! [Evil2]

reply

Agreed. If not for the success of Joan Jett, they would have been forgotten entirely but for the passing and recent scandal of Kim Fowley who was more well-known than the band. In truth though they were no worse musicians than the Sex Pistols. But they had no real message to bring while the Sex Pistols influenced a generation.

reply

I don't think it was Geddy, Alex or Neil that did the bullying.

reply

I heard Joan's claim that it was Rush as well but it was a very quick comment and I don't remember her specifying the Roadies but it does seem out of character for the band. Then again though, who other than Joan really knows, it's all speculation but the girls did take out their vengeance on one of Alex's guitars.

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man....

reply

Here is Geddy Lee's response to the Runaways accusation:

"The Runaways had a ginormous chip on their shoulders. I remember that show. We had trouble with our gear so our soundcheck got delayed and The Runaways never got one. But we were always good to whoever was opening for us. We had no bias against them because they were girls - none of that *beep* I know they said that we were laughing at them when they played, but quite frankly they were too *beep* to listen to. And 40 years later they have a story to tell about it. Who knew?"

The article this was taken from can be found here: http://www.rushisaband.com/blog/2013/04/22/3603/Excerpts-from-Prog-magazines-Rush-cover-story

Check out the small photo of Joan, Lita, and Cherie with the members of Rush taken in LA in late 1976. Mercury Records were holding a party for Rush celebrating their success of their 1976 album 2112. http://www.2112.net/powerwindows/tours/761201rush&runaways.jpg

Redhooks

"You don't get something for nothing, you don't get freedom for free." Neil Peart

reply

Here is a video of Alex Lifeson talking about Rush's interactions with The Runaways:
https://youtu.be/iPpfoE0Jdmc

Redhooks

"You don't get something for nothing, you don't get freedom for free." Neil Peart

reply

The tour date at Cobo Hall in Detroit that all the debate is about was 40 years ago today on Feb. 10, 1977.

Redhooks

"You don't get something for nothing, you don't get freedom for free." Neil Peart

reply

Given the article that just came out in The Huffington Post about the band and their beyond sleazy manager, who brutally raped one of the band members, and the fact Joan Jett apparently sat and watched the entire event and offered no solace to her band mate afterward or ever, when it comes to believing Geddy Lee or Joan Jett...I'll put my money on Geddy Lee.

reply

Jackie Fox, the Runaways member whom the incident happened to, gives a very thorough explanation of what happened to her, and why she isn't blaming her bandmates for what happened in this recent interview:


https://www.yahoo.com/music/the-runaways-jackie-fox-on-righting-rape-wrongs-124550544286.html

reply

People aren't very nice to each other sometimes, especially when they're relatively young and f^cked up on various substances. And it's hard 40 years later to decide if someone crossed a line. It's not hard to believe bad things about Kim Fowley, but frankly both Jackie Fox's and Cherrie Currie's differing accounts are perfectly believable. Women certainly do get raped or taken sexual advantage of, but both women and men are capable of making very bad decisions when they're messed up on drugs and alcohol.

Whatever happened, the idea that Jackie Fox is "the most important Runaway" because she accused their manager of rape is kind of an insult to the accomplishments of the rest of the band.

"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"

reply