Why would Disney want two different versions of their iconic characters?
Wouldn't they want one distinct look for each of their iconic characters instead of, for instance, having two completely different looks for the Mad Hatter (the 1951 version and the Burton version)? Why couldn't they have just brought the already-iconic characters to life, but with some new touches? Why have two contrasting faces to represent a single character? Why don't they want one definitive look for each of their characters? Why wouldn't they want you to see one specific, identifiable look of a character when you walk into Disneyland?
The Disney label is so powerful and so iconic, and every time people think of a fairy tale, they automatically associate it with Disney's animated version of that tale (if Disney had created a film version of it, that is), so it's confusing why they chose to do a new interpretation of the "Alice" story, instead of bringing their beloved, iconic characters to life.
I am still surprised and saddened that they disregarded the original animated film--you would think that with the Disney label on it, it would actually bring DISNEY's version to life in the way that Disney did with Cinderella and is currently doing with The Jungle Book and Beauty & the Beast.
It sounds petty but it really bugs me.