Bad Film For General Audiences; Good Film For Esoteric Mamet Fans
Most of the reviews and board postings here are highly polarized, with people either marvelling at Redbelt, or disparaging it.
With respect to Mamet fans, I believe this movie isn't a good one for general audiences, because:
1. Deus Ex Machina - too many events seemed contrived, which would ruin a general audience moviegoer's suspension of disbelief. The accidental shooting I can accept, but what comes afterwards - the bar fight to save the actor, the watch gift ultimately ending up in the cop's hands & threatening his career, the scheme to defraud the wife & entangle Terry, the betrayal of the wife, the cop's suicide...it seems to me that there would be a greater chance of getting struck by a meteor than all that happening to lead to the situation Terry finds himself in. It's just not believable.
2. Wandering Plot + Undecipherable Characters - The plot wanders with no clear & understandable direction to it. And I just didn't understand the motivations and actions of most of the characters. I had to refer to the many postings on this board to figure out what was happening & why, and what the movie was really about. (Thanks to all the Mamet fans for your comprehensive explanations.) I believe that it is the responsibility of the director of the film to convey what the movie is all about to the audience, we shouldn't need off-movie explanations of almost everything.
In the same way that not all forms of art, literature, or poetry appeal to the general masses, I believe this film isn't suitable for the general masses, but that it is very suitable to esoteric mamet fans (who seem to be very passionate about it).
"No *beep* sh*t lady, do I sound like I'm ordering a pizza?" - John McClane