any good ?


any good ?

reply

Just literally finished watching it.

I did not like it one bit.

reply

and I whole heartedly agree

This flick stinks, cake may be real, but the average score about this film is a lie.

Raiders was cool it took place all over Europe (Nepal, Peru, Egypt) - FlippyFlopper

reply

Thanks a lot.

reply

I was being very generous when I gave this movie 4/10 stars... It was terrible.

reply

it's the absolute opposite of good. stay far away.

reply

I'm about 50 minutes into it and feeling very, very sorry for Charles Durning, Margaret Colin, William Forsythe, Billy Dee Williams and Gabrielle Anwar. Why in the hell did they get involved with this mess? Times must be tough. I can't remember the last time I saw so many recognizable names trudging through such an unbelievably poorly written "script". Hmmmm, Irwin Allen's When Time Ran Out? Maybe that.

Yes, I killed Yvette. I hated her sooo much. F - flames, on the sides of my face - heaving, breath-

reply

This movie is a teabag. It reeks and the cast sucks at playing the parts. Yes time are very very tough for all of them.
Manos the hands of death BADD

reply

[deleted]

IT IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER
IT SHOULD BE TAUGHT AT FILM SCHOOLS NATIONWIDE
CITIZEN KANE CAN SUCK THIS MOVIE'S DIIIIIIICK

reply

Not at all. I hardly rate films lower than a 4/10 and I had to give this a 2.5/10. It was awful. It ended up placing on my Worst 30 Horror Movies of the Decade.
----------------------
You are being WATCHED right now...


Member of the Addison Army.

reply

Not really. 3/10

reply

I run a group for amateur filmmakers and writers, and I use this movie as an example of how not to make a film. I also use it as an example of self-delusion among filmmakers. It's really disheartening to see so many resources poured into something so completely terrible, but, what's worse is that there seems to be no objectivity from the filmmakers about even the most glaringly awful oversights (starting, I would imagine, at the script level).

reply