Meryl Was Miscast


She wasn't invested completely in this film, and the film suffered for it. Meryl was the weakest link. I'd rather see Emma Thompson play her, she would have been able to save this film. Alexandra Roach, who played the young Margaret, was aptly more believable, even though the whole "let's make Thatcher a feminist" did trickle in there, however, even though the subject would abhor that label being placed on her when she did not herself own it on her agency.

That being said, I liked the intelligent script and the approach taken by Phyllida Lloyd, but I thought that it would have been better to show more sexist encounters Thatcher experienced in office, as well as how she chose to manifest them on her person. And, this is not coming from a political perspective at all, I was just famished for depth as there were so many things unexplored that it made it hard to achieve showing women can lead a country successfully as I believe Lloyd was trying to show. But, what hurts the film is the glossed over details and the exceptionalization of the subject. I realize the historical importance might justify the need for that, but in order to show equality, the subject must be treated as if she was a man in order to be viewed as such in a presentation such as this.

reply

[deleted]

Just because one impersonates doesn't mean one actually acts. Emma Thompson would have made it more authentic and would have made the material better given her writing prowess.

reply

Blaa, blaa, blaa, Timmy. When will that slicon chip inside yourside your head get switched to overload??

reply

When Meryl gets off Harvey's genitals.

reply

I agree with you. I thought the mimicry was great (accent, body language etc), but I don't think Meryl captured the soul of Thatcher at all. It was actually a pretty dull performance - on of the worst I've seen of her (and I'm a huge fan).

I simply am not there...

reply

She wasn't invested enough in her character, and her performance, and the film (since she was the vehicle here) suffered for it. Emma Thompson would have been a better Thatcher, and would have even made appropriate script edits.

reply

I think that no matter who played Thatcher, the movie would have been boring. The script was dull - and it needn't have been, because Thatcher's life was far from dull. Watching her wandering around for most of the film as an old woman with dementia was not very interesting, and I think Meryl did her best with the dull material. Emma Thompson could also have been awesome with a better script, but I doubt even she could have saved this film.

I simply am not there...

reply

If a film suffers, the actors are probably the reason why, since they carry the film. Meryl is no exception because she's Meryl. You can sprinkle gold on crap and its still crap.

reply

I disagree. Meryl was perfect IMO.

I don't like reading posts by people who think their opinions are absolute facts.


"Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends..."

reply

Then clearly this message board isn't the best place for you then.

reply

I saw this for the first time yesterday and couldn't agree more about Ms Streep being miscast! But not too sure about Emma Thompson saving the film, when the real weak link for me, was the script. Here we have one of the most fascinating women in modern history (and love her or loathe her, one can't deny that fact)and the majority of the script was focused on Thatcher's slide into dementia.

When I use the expression 'first time' that is a bit misleading. I tend to re-visit films I enjoy and seem to get something from them on each viewing, but can't imagine what another view of this one would yield me.

reply

Emma Thompson is a great screenwriter, and would have written moments of depth in the many scenes that required it.

reply

Yes of course, she did a great job on Sense and Sensibility, which is the first one that comes to mind. Austen is not the easiest writer to faithfully transfer to screen.
This is not an area I associate her with, but you are so right.
Maybe we should write to her and suggest another film?

reply

She's already working on My Fair Lady, but I would like to see her take on Thatcher in the RIGHT way.

reply

Yes, all the facets can be examined and the film can go much longer with such a riveting social history to examine through her (Thatcher's)lens. The slide into dementia (so common and even befell her mate Ronald Regan) should have taken the 5 minutes devoted to the Falklands campaign/conflict in TIL.

reply

Exactly, political affliation aside, I wanted to see institutional sexism through the lens of a woman who said her success was not owed to women's liberation. To see society even though to her, it didn't exist. You get the picture?

reply

Yes, I think so. I don't know enough about the politics of the film makers and I read somewhere else on here that Streep said she didn't agree with MT's politics.
I would like to say, who cares? But people do. That side of Ms Streep's life really doesn't interest me. The Method aside, I thought she was hired to do an acting job, which she did and very well too. But she didn't write the script and of course, must have agreed with it to do it.
As for MT not owing anything to WL (according to her), I would strongly disagree, because as a young women involved in the Second Wave and also living in London and traveling extensively throughout the UK all during 1979, I encountered plenty of women who claimed that they voted Conservative solely because of her gender. But as the saying goes "there is none so blind as those who will not see" etc.

The Margaret Thatcher I observed would never have admitted such a thing, even though they must/do have political analysts on very side who are aware of every trend and what it means to them.

reply

'She wasn't invested completely in this film, and the film suffered for it. Meryl was the weakest link'
---------------
Is that being miscast or just half-committed?

reply

Both, with the exception that she wasn't committed at all to her character outside of makeup look and accent tricks of the bag. You might as well given her the award for pity that someone that talented has reduced herself to a victim of her own clout. Oh wait.....

reply

sounds like the Hepburn 67' award, who was about the same age as Streep at the time.
But,of course....that will be considered "different"

reply

Hepburn never had a sugar daddy like Harvey Weinstein to purchase an award for her, let alone she was of the attitude that she didn't care for the recognition, her work was rewarding enough.

reply

I disagree, I thought Meryl was wonderfully involved in the film and disappears in the character...if anything the script and direction is what was weak

An actor is only as great as the direction given and can only put out as much as the director asks

reply

...so can a parakeet, but even those adopt accents intermittently. If the film sucked, especially if its a vehicle for said actor, then the actor shares responsibility. Meryl is no exception. I mean its not like she poops gold as an actor as of late anyway.

reply

Total BS. She was brilliant. I'd be willing to bet that everybody crying about Emma Thompson is British and just pissed because an American was chosen to play Thatcher.

I guess we should've boycotted Batman because he was portrayed by a Brit. Sounds rather silly, doesn't it???

reply

Christian Bale was invested in his character. Meryl was not. And Meryl can suck too. At the most, seeing how she is "Meryl," she is brilliant at sucking at a performance.

reply