My deleted review


Wow, I've just had the following review deleted by imdb "based on an abuse report filed by another user". Seriously? How is this abusive? Just because I found the movie terrible someone felt ABUSED by my review?

I'm going to try to resubmit it so people are warned about this movie and also post it here on the board in case some douche finds it "abusive" again and imdb acts on his behest.


"Let me start by saying: THIS MOVIE, IT'S TERRIBLE. IT' TERRIBLY HORRIBLE. PLEASE PEOPLE DO NOT, I REPEAT DO NOT SEE IT! I couldn't get past the 60 minute mark and trust me I've seen some bad movies and endured them till the end. But this one was so bad I couldn't even bother. Not a bit of entertainment in this one.

The director's big stinky ego is smeared all over this, and he thinks he is the next Kusturica, Fellini and Gilliam to name just a few this hack is attempting to channel. But even Kusturica's Life is a Miracle, although atrocious in its own merit, has nothing on this pretentious train wreck.

The camera man is shooting a Fanta commercial here, so it seems, while the producers, for some reason they thought it'd be cool and fitting to include a soundtrack made entirely of abstract/modern/jazz/nonsense music. When the Romanian band started emitting this sound in the beginning of the movie I knew it would stink.

The characters are underdeveloped and the main protagonist barely opens her mouth throughout the film.

European magic realism my bum. This is full of stereotypes, clichéd cinematography, wooden dialogue and paper-thin story. 40 minutes could have been cut easily and nothing would have been lost.

Now please excuse me while I go re-watch Lilja 4ever."



1/10

- don't worry that's just my signature.

reply

abstract/modern/jazz/nonsense music. When the Romanian band started emitting this sound in the beginning of the movie I knew it would stink
Do you know why the traditional Roumanian jazz was fused with a pastiche of modern West European and American jazz?If you figure that out, you'll figure out what the film means, every episode in the film will suddenly make sense, you'll realize the double irony of your Fanta comment (director is condemning shallow fake western art and western commercialism and commodification, and Fanta reminds me of Fantine from Les Miserables, a book whose themes of child and female exploitation parallel those of Lilja and Biblioteque), and the error of your Lilja-4-Ever comment (themes of both films are exactly the same).
The characters are underdeveloped
They don't need to be developed because they are synedoches; they represent a whole and the whole is self-explanatory.Every episode in the film is a metaphor for the depraved deadened West whose senses can only be stimulated in extreme sadistic overdrive by feeding on and bloodletting and destroying the East [including Eastern Europe], particularly females.Every trial Mona endures is a metaphor representing the West exploiting and destroying deeply-rooted tradition and culture and purely organic creativity and females and children to satiate the depraved/sadistic sex drives and other deviant subcultures of, and maintain the money piles and worldly powers of, the Western World. Every episode presents to us the rape and destruction of the traditional, organic, free-flowing cultures of the East (and their women and children............) and their replacement with human trafficking, prostitution, debauchery, sado-masochism, fake art/high art/carnival trash (Pascal), drug addiction, custom made ostentatious furnishings that give you a reason to never leave your home, the depravity and dehumanization prettily and colourfully wrapped but nevertheless destruction. Mona and all the Victims and all the Victimizers are sucked into a black vacuum, a black hole, the life sucked right out of them, which is what the sex-money-power-deviant driven West needs to get off, get high, and enjoy life. The West's deviant culture hidden away in a vacuum, its participants nameless and faceless, sucked lifeless by the vacuum the vacuum scene with Mona in that leather black costume........) Other scenes depicted the post-modern sex-money-power driven West destroying its own priceless treasure trove of Western civilization by making a mockery f greatly loved and immeasurably influential literature figures (Antigone, Oliver Twist, Pinocchio, The Little Prince, Katherina from Taming of the Shrew, Desdemona from Othello, etc: all of whom represent a facet of Mona's psyche and personality and worldview and all of whom represent a facet of the film's themes), whose literary struggles brought to the forefront of social/political/intellectual discourse the persecution and exploitation and dehumanization of women and children. The Joan of Arc room, heavily symbolic: nobody believed her and she was pounded in court by her questioners [just as Mona was pounded by men operating sex slave industry] and then burned to death, but not before being forced to recant her testimony just before the flesh-eating flames were ignited; the West [represented by the social worker] denied the underlying authenticity of Mona's experiences and forced her to recant her testimony and provide an "it's all my fault, I'm trash, I only have me to blame, the men who exploited me bear no responsibility for my demise" confession that psychology burns and destroys her in exchange for getting her daughter back.Additionally, Mona and Lilja both left the East to work in the West and both are forced into sexual slavery and both suffer the destruction of their identities and while both escape their experiences neither are recognizable as the woman and teenager they once were, one commits suicide and the other commits symbolic suicide (recantation of her experiences and denial that she was exploited sexually and economically).
and the main protagonist barely opens her mouth throughout the film
Films with minimal or no dialogue are not terrible nor uncommon or unheard of. Like many protagonists, Mona does open her mouth but not in the traditional sense (verbally articulated dialogue). She opens her eyes and mind to the viewers. We see the world through her eyes and mind. The cinematography and set designs and her child-like wide-eyed expressiveness are her dialogue: scenarios of dehumanization cinematized as fairy-tale stories, all intensely coloured with an ultra-professional glossy cosmopolitan sheen, beginning with light colours that continuously darken with each episode (the deeper we go into the underworld, the darker the world becomes, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west: the film begins in the east then moves to the west for the bulk of the film, returning to the east in the final minutes), elf green/apple green/lush lawn green to vistas of heraldic blues to velvety caramels and dripping taffy browns to thundering scarlet to sleek industrial jet black. The world as she sees it bright and vivid and fairy-tale like, everything glows, Mona is clear-sighted (which also symbolizes the underlying truthfulness of everything she experiences) and has hope in life despite everything. Which is perhaps a reference to Pascal's Wager - she lives her life as if she has everything to gain and nothing to lose, the matrix of free-flowing jazz lines that emerge throughout the film also represent her journey from east to west, the further into the into the Western underground she goes, the more abstracted and confused the musicality, representing the confusion of that lifestyle, of the West, of Mona's state of mind, of this world. The camera focuses on her eyes from beginning to end because behind her eyes is where the story unfolds, what's behind the eyes, the vacuum, the black hole, the curtains, the doors, the camera focus on her eyes asks those questions, no dialogue necessary.Every film is pretentious. Including documentaries. Saying a film is pretentious is like saying heavy metal music is loud.10/10

reply

Sorry, but you make as little sense and appear to be as pretentios as this movie. Are you the director by chance? I didn't read all of the ideology-fuelled nonsense that you've managed to spew out here, but this caught my eye:

Do you know why the traditional Roumanian jazz was fused with a pastiche of modern West European and American jazz?

If you figure that out, you'll figure out what the film means, every episode in the film will suddenly make sense, you'll realize the double irony of your Fanta comment (director is condemning shallow fake western art and western commercialism and commodification, and Fanta reminds me of Fantine from Les Miserables, a book whose themes of child and female exploitation parallel those of Lilja and Biblioteque), and the error of your Lilja-4-Ever comment (themes of both films are exactly the same).



WTF is "traditional Roumanian jazz"?

And how is Lilja 4ever exactly the same as this pompous trainwreck?


1/10

- don't worry that's just my signature.

reply

Oh, and one more thing. I've browsed your message board history a bit and noticed you like pretty much the same kind of movies I do (Politist, adjective, Howl (2010), etc..) so I really cannot fathom how you cannot see this trash film for what it is... I'm sorry but it really doesn't work on any level, not even on your wishful fanta-comemrcial-as-condemnation imagined level.

1/10

- don't worry that's just my signature.

reply

I watched the first 30 minutes or so on a streaming online service last night but started to fall asleep. It was late.

I was intrigued and will pick up where I left off some time soon. The movie has an interesting visual style and is both whimsical and unvarnished in its brutality at the same time.

A breath of fresh air as compared to all the mega-million blockbusters we're barraged with constantly.

All Art is pretense.

reply

Finally watched the whole movie last night. Was charmed and disturbed in turn and didn't lose interest at any point. Loved the unreliable narrator motif (see "Life of Pi" for another recent example).

All Art is pretense.

reply