MovieChat Forums > Machete (2010) Discussion > What did u men think about the naked wom...

What did u men think about the naked woman in the beginning?

posted 13 years ago by Celestina_24
55 replies | jump to latest

I heard she was so sexy that some of you had to pause and bust a nut. Shes hot but, seriously?

reply

[–] Tyler-A-Arse 13 years ago

She looked hot while she was in the bed, and of course when he was carrying her down the stairs. But once they showed her boney butt from behind while she was standing, I took away some cool points.

reply

[–] jnor 13 years ago

I think the excess of female nudity is the patriarchy further shoving women into a sex class for the benefit of 15-30 yr old men their prime target audience. It's tasteless and insulting to thinking people of either sex.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] the_bamboo_spear 13 years ago

You need some testosterone, if you're a guy. If you're a girl, you must be ugly.

---------------------------------

Machete don't text

reply

[–] jnor 13 years ago

I thought the film was fine- but I really don't see how a movie about oppressed people can't see how the male mainstream oppresses women by writing these sorts of over sexualized all I'm good for are my tits roles for them. My testosterone's fine, I F!ck plenty and love it.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] TheMachinistSleeps 13 years ago

Hahaha... you thought the movie was trying to make a statement about oppressed people... good one! What? You thought this was Hotel Rwanda part 2? This was a comedy, made in a style that a lot of people obviously don't understand. A style which demands excess violence, nudity, and corny dialogue. Watch more movies.

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Ace19444 13 years ago

Um, haha, it's done in the style of '70s exploitation (did you get that? EXPLOITATION), and those films had plenty of sexy female nudity. If they didn't have that in this flick, people would be getting on it's ass for THAT. If that bothers you, then stay away from anything grind house :)

reply

[–] kjhuang17 12 years ago

Would you be happy if the movie also threw in some naked buff guys walking around with their dongs hanging out? I'll be willing to give you that if it makes you feel better about the naked women.

reply

[–] Kataspie 12 years ago

As a lesbian and a fan of 70's based exploitation movies, I loved it. There is fun, then there is oppression. This is definitely fun, in a sarcastic way.

Evolve or die.

reply

[–] chunk_2000 13 years ago

haha classic!

reply

[–] jawsfan007 12 years ago

the opening girl was cute. I loved when Lindsay Lohan woke up in the church.

I liked how RR had the squishy sound effect for when she retrieved the "phone"

reply

[–] DaveFishBulb 13 years ago

Stuffy old men don't belong on the internet!

When the door goes down blow the bulbs.

reply

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] thekino 12 years ago

lol cosign

reply

[–] monstermayhem32 12 years ago

One of the things that I was curious about was how the naked woman that Machete was meant to rescue ended up stashing a cell phone in her pussy.

reply

[–] OdumC 11 years ago

I appreciated the fact that they used a clamshell design cell for that particular scene.

And she was smoking hot but no adding to the spank bank off THAT. it was a butt and a brief flash of boob. if that little bit drives someone to drop trou and start spanking it like a monkey I'd suggest getting some decent porn.

Thank the Gods for NETFLIX!!

reply

[–] Balberith 10 years ago

She was beautiful period. WAY better looking than J-Lo too!!!

"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

[–] jnor 13 years ago

like most women are not forced at gunpoint to take 75 cents to the man's dollar that doesn't mean it isn't oppressive. No one forced these particular actresses to take these roles no...just like no one forced a prostitute to be a prostitute...but oh wait the patriarchy kinda did didn't it? Don't tell me to look things up. Read some basic radical feminism it kinda makes a lot of sense...but your more than likely too caught up in your male privilege to see it. Don't know what that means? GASP look it up.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] andell 12 years ago

Wow..you are such a mangina!

Maybe you should think about female privilege...it exists, but one of the most effective strategies that feminists have employed is to play the victim card so often that people don't see female privilege.

I would destroy your mangina feminist points...but this forum is about the movie, not about feminism vs reality.

If you don't like movies like this...DON'T WATCH THEM!

This film is meant to recreate the vintage drive in exploitation flicks of the 60's and 70's!

reply

[–] ulht1 12 years ago

With no offense jnor, this and your other posts seem to be lifted bodily from women's liberation publications/speeches of 40 or so years ago. I know because A)I was alive during that time and B) I collected "underground" and counter-culture materials - have a rather nice collection of same. Times and situations have changed/expanded. Pick up new phrases for the diatribes, make it fresh................

if it isn't funny enough have someone hit in the face with a fish. Since Thorne Smith likes it ...

reply

[–] Taanefindahl 13 years ago

She was damn hot.

reply

[–] sockscats 13 years ago

I'm a white man who loves latina women and this is the 2nd best conventional hollywood(As opposed to a hardcore porno) film for seeing hot latinas! The wild bunch is #1.

I don't know how titilated women got watching the film seeing 60 something actors like De Niro, Johnson and Seagal and that guy who looks like a lawn mower ran over his face but for us men it was hot!

reply

[–] jnor 13 years ago

I'm also not saying stop sexualizing women...I'm saying stop doing it if it's only going to be women. sockscats has a point- why all the ugly dudes? And if it's a movie about ugly dudes...lets make the people slobering all over them look realistic.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jnor 13 years ago

Nah, Those men where ugly. Ryan Phillipe and pretty dudes though do wonders for my penis.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] andell 12 years ago

I don't know...some of the bad guys weren't that bad looking.

Yeah, they weren't in the movie for long in most cases...but still...there were a few cute ones!

But I agree...most were...blah!

reply

[–] MorsePacific 13 years ago

"What did u men think about the naked woman in the beginning?"

I think Mayra Leal is damn beautiful! That she has a communications degree earns her even more cool points with me.

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] gunnut123456 13 years ago

One of the best looking women I've ever seen. 'Nuff said.

reply

[–] dansig122 13 years ago

Um, yeah, she was the hottest girl in the movie.

**Though Booth's wife was a grade *A* MILF!

reply

[–] silentmovie 13 years ago

Did you notice the squishy noise when she pulls out the cell phone?

reply

[–] dansig122 13 years ago

Yeah, fit in pretty well with the over-the-top feel of the movie.

reply

[–] MorsePacific 13 years ago

It sounds even better with headphones.

reply

[–] zimbabwebob 13 years ago

She was really hot but it was absolutely disgusting when she pulled the cell phone out...

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jnor 13 years ago

"Basically the same" still isn't the same btw.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jnor 13 years ago

Women don't make more than men *eye roll*. And I'm not replying to the wrong message as far as I'm concerned, I'm replying to the last post on the thread. Statistics exist for a valid reason, we can't just over look them because they *may* (unlikely) have been manipulated.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jnor 13 years ago

or you can simply adjust your imdb message settings and adhere to me.

www.myspace.com/dullglitter

reply

[–] 13 years ago

[deleted]

[–] andell 12 years ago

Actually, women typically don't make less than men either when they're working in the same job, for the same amount of time, and all the variables associated with the workplace are the same!

If women were earning less, you'd have no problems listing five companies which publically and specifically pay their female employees less than their male employees.

However childless women between 22-30 are now outearning their male peers.

The reality is that men have earned more than women historically because men have worked in their jobs longer, or have worked longer hours, or did not go off on parental leave! Those are facts.

Your "women earn 75 cents on the dollar" has DEFINITELY been manipulated...if it were correct, than you'd have no problems finding a list of companies that specifically pay their female staff only 75% of their male staff!

Maybe you can answer this for me though: why is it that, when a woman is convicted of killing her husband, on average she's sentenced to 6 years in prison, but a man convicted of the same crime (on his wife) on average serves 17 years in prison?

Why is it that, in California, if you're a woman who had committed a non-violent crime, you serve on average just 20% of your sentence...but if you're a man who has committed a non-violent crime, you serve on average 80% of your sentence?

Why is it that a female victim of statutory rape who becomes pregnant can choose to have an abortion that is publically funded...but a male victim of statutory rape that results in pregnancy...is required to pay child support to his rapist?

The judicial gap, unlike the pay equity myth, IS REAL!

Just so you know!

reply

[–] ThingyBlahBlah3 13 years ago

I didn't do that, but yes, that girl's ass belongs in a museum.

_____________________
'It's a mess, ain't it, sheriff?'
'If it ain't, it'll do till the mess gets here.'

reply

1
2