Why do they dislike Women's Rights, and the free will Rights of Americans? I will never get that especially since their party was the one that freed my ancestors from Slavery...are you all sure that conservatives love America, or is it the Liberals of Today? I couldn't care for either they are both Snakes in the Barrel looking to snap at us either way you look at it.
shareNothing you said is correct. But thanks for the generalization.
This is my sig...Now look up.
Ummm ok? Is this guy for real?
shareThis must be a joke.
share"dislike women's rights" That's funny. Since your African American you should learn the history of planned parenthood and abortion. Its eugenics its brainwashing and propaganda based on fear to kill African Americans. The founder of planned parenthood was Margret Sanger a believer in eugenics (The African Americans were inferior) she created planned parenthood to kill minorities and the poorest and they are doing a fine job of that.
shareYou should try educating yourself a bit better.
Back in the day, Democrats fought in the civil war to keep their slaves. One hundred years later, Democrats filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act wanting to deny blacks equal rights. And today, Democrats fight to keep their cheap-labor illegal Mexican slaves, while turning their back on the American worker.
Democrats, the founding party of slavery, have never changed, yet, somehow have managed to brainwash millions of fools to keep them in power, while the Democrats continue to keep them in poverty.
That's the one thing Democrats are good at manipulating people into believing their helping them when all evidence points to the fact that their policies hurt everyone they touch. Their also great at rewriting history.
shareAnd if the democrats ultimately succeed nobody will have anything except what the government provides them. We'll all be hungry, poor, miserable, live like the poor of Mexico, Somalia, Afghanistan, Cuba.
But the ruling class will live as royalty. Saddam and Fidel liked wearing military uniforms, Momar liked his pic taken driving a tractor...but they had fabulous palaces and ruled an impoverished population.
People complain about republicans having money. They are typically educated, hard-working people. They are more likely to have earned their own money rather than inherited it compared to democrats (Kennedys?). They provide jobs (opportunity) and you can rise in their America.
Democrats, at their core, are pure communists. In their countries...and even in some of the American communities they preside over, all are poor except the leaders and their cronies..and nobody has any rights except what they feel like giving you at the moment. Look at all those killed and imprisoned indefinitely in North Korea, Cuba, China...on the whims of the rulers.
I despise both parties as well, not sure who I hate more.
But, to answer your question:
A) They hate women's rights because the bible tells them to. They don't think very deeply. Trace it back to things like the pope proselytizing contraception is a sin.
They cling to religion instead of reason (that way they don't have to use their brain).
B)I don't think they hate non-whites so much as they won't pander to them like liberals do. Anything to get a vote, those liberals. If you want a business to decide what an employee is worth instead of the government you're an "oppressive" capitalist that's "against the working man". That'll get the Democrats a few thousand votes very time. Liberals want to baby you, and most Americans seem to want to be babied.
C) The elderly? Are you serious? There is no group in the country with more money than old people. Instead of paying there way through the golden years, they trip over each other trying to vote for whomever will give them the most freebies. That's both parties. The liberals are just better at the art of pandering, and neither party will slap them on the wrist and tell them they've taken enough.
So, your post could just as well be titled: Why do liberals hate personal responsibility, people with a work ethic and the Constitution?
Judging by how you titled your post, not sure you are bright enough to figure that out.
@daniel4242T Good points, but I think you give the liberals a bit of a pass though. They use the poor and minorities as political pawns for their ultimate goals of a totally gov't ruled society. Is capitalism any better, where a man's worth is judged by what he can produce for the "greedy Corporation"? I don't know, I'm not a social economist. I do know that with proper checks and balances, capitalism is proven sustainable and many average people can prosper and advance themselves.
The problem as I see it is lobbyists. They've been around since the birth of the nation. But now they seem to wield way too much power and influence. On the Democrat side it's pork barrel politics and useless, wasteful projects(mostly unionized) and spending. On the Republican side it's corporations and financial institutions controlling politicians. THe common man in the voting booth is faced with a lose/lose situation.
I think this is the allure of a guy like Trump. He's beholden to no one, has no need for lobby money, therefor he can say or do anything he wants. He seems to speak from a lowest common denominator of common sense, that people rarely hear from politicians. There's never any double talk or back pedaling. He absolutely owns everything he says, good or bad. I don't personally like him. He's another Mike Bloomberg, a megalomaniac.
A) They hate women's rights because the bible tells them to. They don't think very deeply. Trace it back to things like the pope proselytizing contraception is a sin.You nothing about conservatism if you think we hate women's rights. Where does the Bible say to hate women's rights anyway? The Pope? Are you serious? SOOO much of Catholicism is non-scriptural including their stance on contraception.
They cling to religion instead of reason (that way they don't have to use their brain).People that DO use their brains know that the two aren't mutually exclusive.
Conservatives hate white people and that is the real goal. "Conservatism" in the post-wwii sense is really neoliberlism. Its real goal is for white people to hate the institutions they built up and give international capitalism control of all nations. It is pure Orwellian.
The whole origin of the neo/paleo conservative scam goes back to the Rockefellers and other "think tanks" invented them. Before the war, conservatives were generally people who believed in a natural aristocracy and that included socialists.
Conservatives hate white people and that is the real goal.I don't know where you get this. None of my conservative friends (and yes, some of them are "minorities") hate white people. That's just silly.
The policies they support hate white people. The continued support of those policies will continue degenerating white people. It is that simple. You have been brainwashed. Understand this, 10 years ago, I was you. Then I learned the truth. Everything the ruling class does, is there to control you. Take fast food and fossil fuel pollution. What does it do? It gets you high. It robs you of testosterone. It is the same of old talk radio and modern internet. They feed "conservatives" dialectics that support their bias taught to them by the global elite. But in the end, it gets you high.
"Conservatism" used to actually mean socialists in the 19the century. People who opposed the enlightment and saw capitalism as a degeneration of nature. Carlyle, Ruskin ete ete. They saw Feudalism as a superior form of organization while capitalism was emasculated and pathetic. By the 1940's that socialism had been destroyed by Marxism and the dialectics was complete. Thus, they rebranded anybody who opposed bourgeois state legal enforcement of "equal" rights and national control of capital markets, "conservative". This was David Rockefellers grand scam. Thus, they have duped you into plutocracy through social control. One that will only continue to confiscate white wealth slowly creating a people of no self-esteem and downtrodden heroin users.
Honest Abe wasn't a bleeding heart liberal, desperately fighting the black man's corner. His anti-slavery stance was practical and motivated by business, and he thought it a good idea to deport all the blacks to Africa when they were freed. Not because he was a racist, but because he honestly thought that would be the right thing for them and for (white) America.
Nothing is (excuse the pun) black or white, and your worldview is exceedingly narrow and naive.
Awight we're The Daamned we're a punk baand and this is called Carn't Be Appy T'day!
Abe violated the constitutionand ruled like a tyrant. No surprise that arry cites him as an idol.
The Emancipation Proclamation wastotal propaganda and our schools perpetuate the scam. There were slaves in the Union states. The EPspecifically did not free them. The Confederacy considered itself sovereign and did not recognize Lincoln's authority.
In reality the secession was legal, but a tyrant doesn't want to lose any of his power. He would have lost quite a bit, too, as he would not have the south to exploit economically for the good of the northern cities and their majority of votes.
Southerners were tired of being bled dry, legislated into poverty and neglected by the federal government.