MovieChat Forums > The Adventures of Tintin (2011) Discussion > Bad movie ever after Transfirmers sequel...

Bad movie ever after Transfirmers sequels


'm a cgi artist, this one is too hokey to enjoy. Bad camera works, bad modeling, i wanted a live action version.

reply

I'm not a CGI artist and I noticed nothing wrong with it.

reply

Yeah ok because a know it all on a message board is right about everything and has had years of experience in CGI.

reply

Just because you are a CG artist does not make you an authority on film critique or visual storytelling, or somehow make your opinion of CGI films more valid than the opinions of others. Bringing up the fact that you are a CG artist (which I highly doubt, to be honest, given how poorly you conveyed your points afterwords about "camera works" and "bad modeling") just makes you sound like an egotistical blow-hard and come off as sort-of pretentious.

Heck, I'm training in CG animation under a good friend who has been a CG artist and animator for about 20 years, and we both loved the film.

And FURTHERMORE, this is my signature! SERIOUSLY! Did you think I was still talking about my point?

reply

Comparing this to the "Crapformers" sequels is just dumb and laughable.

reply

lololol bad movie ever after transfirmers sequels? learn to speak english, stupid loser

reply

[deleted]

Well said elbwafel. Maybe he should have studied English first before he tried to learn how to create CGI, lol.

reply

Trolling hard. Hard. HARD.

reply