MovieChat Forums > Road to Victory (2007) Discussion > Why aren't there more movies about this ...

Why aren't there more movies about this subject?


Can anyone tell me why Hollywood is afraid to touch the subject of steroid use?

First, let me commend the filmmakers on how well they handled the subject without sensationalizing it. I also realize that sexual dysfunction was a bigger part of the subject matter than the topic of steroids, which was also really interesting, but how come Hollywood won't go near steroids?

At one point Fincher was slated to do "Chemical Pink"...At another point Bonds anauthorized bio "Game of Shadows" was supposed to be made into a movie...

Also, if a movie showcasing a before and after of someone using steroids, I wonder if they would have to shoot is a la "Cast Away," where they shut down production for a while, while someone gets HUGE!

reply

The public demand for a movie about this subject is evident. Just look at how well the "Bigger, Stronger, Faster," documentary did. But, I think the idea of doing a movie with the subject matter of steroids is something Hollywood has been reluctant to do for two reasons:

1. Some really bad after school specials on the subject from the 80's and 90's. (See Vince Vaughn)

2. Most people would naively assume that Hollywood doesn't care who it steps on to sell tickets, but the subject matter is really almost too hot, with too many Sports icons (no, entertainment icons receive no sanction), who were once thought to be Hall of Fame shoe ins, who now may not make it in because of rumors revolving around steroid use. Mark McGuire is a great example of that, and the fact that Senator Mitchell never took any action against a league full of players who were openly shooting each other up in the butt, pretty much sets the tone for giving these athletes a temporary pass.

3. In other sports, like football, the testing is very stringent, just like the IOC, so the players are more often than not, smart enough not to get caught, and they certainly never talk about it, as there is too much for them to risk. When Shawn Merriman of the Chargers got caught, he received a 4 game suspension, costing him millions of dollars. Getting caught a 2nd time could have cost him a year.

4. In college, getting caught is one way to make sure that your status in the draft falls, or you won't get drafted at all.

I think a big Hollywood, mainstream production where Jamie Foxx plays Barry Bonds, or Mark Whalberg plays Romo would feel pretty forced, selling to teen-agers based on the sensationalism of the subject matter alone.

So, it seems like a documentary like "Bigger, Stronger, Faster," as well as an INDEPENDENT feature film, where steroids are the sub-text, or innuendo behind the plot, is probably the place to probe this sensitive subject matter.

Based upon this movies clips, it seems to be the latter. I'll be very interested to see how it holds up to scrutiny once I get a chance to see it.

reply

The Wrestler with Mickey Rourke showed steroid use. It was pretty up close and disturbing.

reply

Hopefully we'll see something more in-depth on the subject soon but it's been touched on in a few movies. The Wrestler as tobias said, The movie Sugar that just came out touches on it, but very briefly, now this. The movie, albeit it's older, ":The Program" shows the downside of roids.

As to why, I think because if you look at the list of names of players who tested posted in the MLB in 2003, there are far too many future hall of fame players on that list and the only way to not sensationalize the drug is to only show the negatives about it, and the way people, include younger teens, follow sports they would many focus on how well these players have played.....Maybe, just a guess.

reply