Very good

I loved Children of Men. It was incredibly realistic and a great accuse to some of the Immigration policies accepted in the world today. Although, I think the documentary is the most partial, not objective film I've ever seen. He interviewed just anti-global advocates, giving the idea that anything America and the western world is doing today is wrong and dangerous. As an immigrant in the United States, I can say that it wouldn't be fair if all immigrants were considered criminals. But I am a legal immigrant, and there are rules to respect. However, I understand that some people, starving to death, move from their countries with reasons, and I respect their courage. Anyway, Naomi Klein, the great architect of the anti-globalization movement, should respect her country, and try to talk about inequality in Saudi Arabia and Cuba. She should go there, and say to the Saudi nobles to leave their posessions to the poor people. I don't think she would be listened. Capitalism is sure not the best political system, extreme capitalism is even worse. But saying that everything we have is wrong and bad for anyone else, is wrong as well. All extremes are WRONG, and dangerous. I've been in Cuba, a supposed wellfare state. It's not, and people don't have the right to talk. So extreme globalization is bad for all western economies and for people exploited in their countries, but anti-globalization is wrong as well. Also, gated communities are the only way to protect people in certain areas. Don't you think there are gated communities in China, Cuba, North Korea? Do you really think Fidel Castro doesn't have bodyguards and guards at the front-gates? I'm not going to talk about terrorism, I really don't want to. But the brain of all terrorist attacks are not poor people, but extremely rich people. As always, these people don't understand that the only ones who suffer from their speeches are the middle-class people. In America, poor people don't almost have to pay taxes, and rich people are rich enough to afford 40% of taxes they have to pay. In the end, who has problems and troubles paying mortgage, school and other things is always the middle-class. They want to talk about communism? Sure. A system in which everyone is enslaved by the state, in which people need to stay in line for hours for a loaf of bread and politicians are rich in their fancy houses, probably houses of someone who has been kicked out to let someone of the party to live in them (it happened all the time). There are a lot of inequalities in the capitalist system. A lot of flaws and mistakes have been done. That doesn't mean that we should turn to communist or anti-globalization ideologies, simply because communism has failed not just against the USA, but it failed towards its own people, because as it happened in Eastern Germany, people were tired of being enslaved by the party, they wanted food, wealth and at least the chance of a new and better life. Sure, I'd love a world without gates, walls and barriers. But with no rules, and uncontrolled migrations, we wouldn't know who, among the people come in the country, has bad intentions against the people living in that very country. As I said, all extremes are wrong and I am so sad, because I loved Children of Men and i didn't want to see it turned into an anti-global, anti-american, anti-democratic speech. Democracy has so many flaws and holes, but it's still better than a dictatorship. Don't forget that our companies exploit Chinese workers. But the Chinese government, still communist, allows that to happen. So, ok saying that America and the Western World are guilty of many mistakes, but don't forget other people's mistakes. To anti-globalization advocates I'd say: you don't like McDonald's, I know. I am Italian and a lot of people are anti-globalization. So what do they do? they destroys shops, McDonald's, bank, cars, and autos. That's not really fighting for an ideology. They don't like McDonald's? Ok. But poor people can at least afford a meal at McDonald's because Italian Panini are too expensive for poor people. Is it fair? Maybe not, but at least some people can eat. But let's say that there are non-violent, quiet anti-globalization people. Fair enough. What do they think we should do? They always blame, without giving any solution. Guess what, some people cannot afford an Armani or Prada dress, so they want chinese products, because they are cheaper. You don't want them to buy cheap clothes anymore? Just poor people in the third world count as poor? American or Italian or French poor ones don't count? Don't they have the right to wear something, and to eat something? And what if companies stopped producing their products in China or India? What would happen to Chinese and Indian people, jobless? In an hypothetical world, there wouldn't be gates, walls, borders, and inequality. But we don't live in 'should land' or in 'if world'. That's our world and we have to deal with it, even if it's not fair. Anti-globalization and communist ideologies wouldn't work for the simple fact that they don't consider human inner fears, human feelings and human desires. Bottomline: Children of Men is a GREAT MOVIE with the worst bonus material ever.