MovieChat Forums > Red (2008) Discussion > I am very annoyed

I am very annoyed


Hi Folks,

Can I start by saying I Am Very Annoyed.

I am a 31 year old man living in the UK. I am married with 2 beautiful children.

I am worried about the world we live in. I watch movies like this one and realise that although fiction they represent life her and now. I worry about my childrens future and what good I can teach them when there is so much bad influence around.

I know people will tell me "its only a film" and to stop over-reacting but this is happening NOW.

Please don't tell me this has been happening for years and point to older movies with similar premises. My point is this is very worrying to me in society right NOW and I just felt I needed to make my point.

PJ

reply

I think you are paranoid and misinterpret movies for something else.


Do you think that this movie will make some people shoot dogs and whatnot?


For most people, they already know that shooting animals for no reason is bad and immoral so even if this movie was pro-cruelty (which it was not) it wouldn't affect you.

It will only affect you if you are a born psychopath.

for sane people, they will look at the movie and think something like
"oh poor dog, and violence is so stupid"

but a psychopath will watch the movie and think
"ooo, shooting dogs that looks fun, ha ha ha"


and just so you know, youth violence has decreased a lot in the last 20 years

only once have i ever encountered senseless violence, a stupid kid literally killed a butterfly by breaking its wings.

*beep* assh**e

so i just though you should now that your family will be safe as long as none of them are born psychopaths

reply

I also think you are pretty paranoid, and that is because you are now a father.
I bet when you were a child, your parents had the exact same paranoia.

All you can do is teach your children the ways of the world, not hiding things from them but show them reality, so they are prepared for life.

reply

Movies, music, television, books, radio...

...but you know what's the most violent and destructive force out there?

RELIGION.

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/

reply

Society is a real mess. However, all you can do is take care of your kids, raise them right, and hope that they do good.

This was a great movie, but to be honest, the McCormick father was a bit of a caricature of a bad guy.

reply

The movie was extremely challenging on several levels. For me, the animal cruelty and senseless violence in the first scenes was, of course, extremely disturbing. What happened subsequently, however, was worse: a steady escalation to lethal violence that even Avery finally concedes he had played a major role in bringing about.

The issues were not black-and-white by any means; When one takes the most righteous cause to extremes and refuses to back off or let somebody else prevail --- even if that somebody is wrong, unjust and infuriating --- then the consequent loss of life and cycle of bloodshed and rfetribution eclipses any fundamental righteousness. The end cannot justify the means. Was Red the dog appropriately avenged or honored by what happened in his name?

There is an ethos --- not always American, not always male --- that says one must seek redress for a wrong or one is weak, spineless, and worthless. If the law, for whatever reason, does not work in one's favor, then one must seek justice outside that law. If that mission involves trespassing, provoking, stalking, publicly humiliating, then so be it --- and Avery used all of those tactics to exacerbate the pathology of the McCormick boy and his father and push them beyond their own fragile boundaries. If Avery was the sane and moral one, as most of us would feel, then he certainly ceded that status by his acts.

Of course Danny was sick and hateful, but he was goaded outside his limits, where Avery, an experienced warrior, was able to terrorize and then kill him with legal impunity. The boy would have probably been an a-hole all his life, but he still didn't deserve the death penalty at age 17, administered by a vigilante feuding with his father. Not to mention the innocent bother's death.

In real life, the lesson of this movie that I would explain to my own children would be that vigilante justice is never warranted. Once the law is abandoned in our conflicts, we risk primal death; the protection of civilization is destroyed, and we return to the dark and bloody history we evolved from. What should Avery have done? Probably sued in small claims court and then dropped the matter, whatever the outcome. Cried over his dog's grave, and tghen bought a new pup. Everybody would have lived, though with a very bad taste in their mouths. It wouldn't have made a very good movie, of course.

reply

"sued in small claims court and then dropped the matter, whatever the outcome"

No. Because the outcome of no consequences for violent behavior is a setup for further violence.

Someone points a gun at you, someone attacks you with a baseball bat - lethal force is appropriate. That much is not challenging.

The film would have been more challenging if the boys hadn't used a gun. You just can't give gun-wielding sociopaths a slap on the wrist.

There are some situations where "the law" is inadequate. What is challenging is figuring out what those situations are, and when the line is crossed.



reply

Danny would have killed one OR MORE if this old man didn't kill him. He went WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY BEYOND "being an *beep* At 17 he killed a dog, for no reason and also shot TWICE with intent to kill...........HE WAS A PSYCHOPATH who deserved MORE than what he got...faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar more.

reply

Some years ago a bicyclist riding along a country road east of Davis, CA, was hit and killed by a 20-something in a Corvette, who left the scene. He was sober by the time they caught up to him, and his father had influence. He should have been charged with vehicular manslaughter at the least, but he got off with little or no punishment. I don't know if he learned a lesson of if he has killed more people with drunk driving in the decades since. If we're all lucky and the hand of father Darwin has intervened, he has since killed himself in a single car accident, or by suicide, before he could reproduce.

The fictional scenario in this movie strikes me as Darwin in action, ridding the gene pool of two murderous and worthless pieces of crap. Sorry it bothered you. The halfway decent younger boy character was killed either by his brother or his drunken father. I just felt sorry for the abused wife - too bad the sorry excuse for a man that bred the older kid wasn't killed also; it's not like such a character would mourn the loss of his sons any more than the loss of a big pimp-mobile SUV.

reply

I agree with you. Yes, it's only a movie, but there's also plenty of kids who act like this (maybe not quite as violently but who act similarly) and have idiot non-parents who indulge them their every action because they can't be bothered with being real parents. I think that was the most disquieting aspect of this entire movie: the subtext and themes about bad parenting and how profoundly it affects kids.

reply

[deleted]

pauljohn...

Not sure what you're "very annoyed" about. Please be specific.

reply

Retrojunk has a point. Take Eddie Murphy, a comic genius. Look at the vapid drivel he has produced ever since he made the mistake of procreating. I swear, people reproduce, and their humanity goes down the gurglar along with the afterbirth and their sense of humour.

reply

Don't take your dog with you when you go fishing - you'll be fine!

reply

Then the embarrassed punks may shoot you, instead...

reply

Why do the brits have such a history of overreacting to films
Just look at the film nasites scare of the 80s... And was the world going to hell then?

The youth of today are fine, especially in the UK - In the state, I will admit there is a problem with over-imprisonment, a similar case is true where I live in Canada - But this isn't so much "the world going to hell" as it is a product of terrible things like the war on drugs, which both costs us money, creates a profitable black market, increases chance of harm and makes it more available to kids (when I was a teen, it was far easier to find weed than to find someone with ID to get booze).

If you really think society is going to hell, don't blame the youth, and instead work to battle the evil systems preying on them.

reply

I see that you wrote your message 2 months ago but in view of the youth riots happening now in England do you still have the same opinion?

"Over imprisonment" is not the problem, the problem is short prison stays for violent behavior and for multiple offenses the perps should be stowed (at hard labor-not college dorm style) out of society until they are too old to commit further acts of violence.

*********************************************
My favorite: "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb"

reply

I feel it all the stronger.
Albeit, the London riots have less to do with the prison problem (though it touches on the related issue of racism, given the instigation) and more to do with a political system that is unsustainable and antiquated. While I feel the rioting youth are misled, and feel most have no clue what they're fighting for - and i worry this will lead to even more of a police state in the UK - I've got to say I'd be glad to see things get worse before they get better. This is merely Capitalism eating itself.
I'm a revolutionary Anarcho-Socialist, so a little riot isn't really going to change my opinion.

Which brings me to another issue, the media's branding of the perps as "anarchists" is ridiculous. Us Anarchists are just alllways robbing jewelery stores. We love our blood diamonds haha. Chances are the journalists writing these stories have never even read a single work by Mikhail Bakunin or Emma Goldman.

reply

Well we're probably not as far apart politically on some issues but as a libertarian I do believe a person has the right to defend lives and property from those who would take it away using lethal means.

I can't see how you can condon the theft of items from small business owners who worked a long time in some cases for little rewards by a bunch of hooligans who should be stopped with lethal force and if arrested, for a long stent on the chain gang where they can learn how a fixed routine and hard work can help them solve their materialism.

But that group of future prison lifers were not protesting politics, it was pure lawless greed and lack of respect for society which supports their idle lifestyle.

Surely, you wouldn't condone groups like that breaking into YOUR home and stealing-burning everything you own.


************************************************
My favorite: "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb"

reply