MovieChat Forums > Hugo (2011) Discussion > Unfortunate box office flop

Unfortunate box office flop


Basically it was a movie which Scorcese made for kids which wouldn't have interested the average one. I enjoyed it but would have been bored out of my skull if I'd watched something like this at 10 (I watched it at 29) apart from Baron Cohen's comic scenes. Scorcese said somewhere that he wanted to respect children's intelligence but I don't think that's a wise box office move while most adults wouldn't be so keen either- because it's too wholesome or they would feel Scorcese was the wrong person to be directing something like this. I'm sure Scorcese would have loved a movie like this as a kid but being box-office savvy would have required dumbing things down. He lost a lot on this film. Then again he's made plenty of moneymakers so that gives him some license to do a financially risky passion project. I'm personally glad he made it, always good to see directors branching out but it was a big budget film with a limited audience.

reply

Marty shrikes me as a guy like Tarantino where I doubt he cares about the box office at all, he has never been in it for the money. He is all about the passion and leaving a legacy behind when he gone. With this movie landing 11 oscar noms and 5 wins, I doubt he has any regrets. He did his job, it was the studio's marketing team that failed.

reply

The movie did not have a consistent protagonist-antagonist structure, or a consistent plot line. Children expect to be told stories that are in the traditional mold.

____________________
The story is king.

reply

As a 26 year old who watched this I found it charming and a fantastic tribute to cinema. But like you I think if I saw this as a child I wouldn't have really appreciated it, aside from it's visuals.

It's a shame it flopped in terms of box office, but it's great film and at least it got some recognition at the Academy.

reply