Glorified pornography


This film is shocking, it promotes sluttery and makes it 'justified' to leer at school girls. Totally immoral. The filmmakers ought to look twice at themselves next time a paedo abuses and rapes an innocent school girl.

Armstrong and Bain are the true legends

reply

... and of course tom and jerry actively promote animal abuse.

"A bit of nudity might at least make this terribly unfunny and atrocious movie vaguely worth watching."
If you are going to have such extreme views, surely you should be consistent?

reply

"This film is shocking, it promotes sluttery".

You have lived a very sheltered life havent you LOL! Its just cheeky, camp british humour. Its not exactly 'Debbie Does Dallas'!

reply

I consider myself far from prudish or reserved when it comes to sexuality or nudeness,semi nudeness being portrayed on film. The problem i have with this film is how young some of the girls look dressed like working girls in a school scenario. Some look barely the legal age of consent,if at all! I realise there is far worse going on in teenage discos up and down the country but to see it so casually displayed in a "kids" movie for cheap laughs is quite disturbing. Many very very young people also share scenes with the slutty dressed older girls..again v.disturbing stuff. It would be a paedophile playground this school!

reply

Haha. Sluttery is my new favourite word. Also the film looks terrible. Like, really, really horrendous-terrible.

But again this'll probably do well enough to spawn several even worse sequels.

reply

i fink that is total bull**** i have seen the film today it only has the odd bit that could even in the slightest be seen as porn (and by this i meen u wud have to live in victorian britain) the film is great i want to see it again

reply

I think extremely tacky would be the best description.

reply

Whatever.....

reply

If it promotes Sluttery he might get some more work. It's been a bit thin on the ground since 'Who's Line Is It Anyway?'

PHEC!

reply

'Who's Line Is It Anyway?'
Don't me started just how excellent this program is.......bring it back i say and bring it back now!

reply

"Who's Lion is it , Anyway ?"

An old circus joke.
Inoffensive and always good at Xmas.

reply

LOL!!!

"IT'S AN OPPINION - IT CAN'T BE WRONG!" - The GREAT Jack Black!

M A R C

reply

XD I was going to say that! Okay, I;m a month late but still! XD

-----
"But you don't care, do ya? Nope. Because you're unconscious..."

reply

p-m-westwood
This film is shocking, it promotes sluttery and makes it 'justified' to leer at school girls. Totally immoral. The filmmakers ought to look twice at themselves next time a paedo abuses and rapes an innocent school girl.
You sure are one sick Feminist nutjob. The Feminist sexist hate propaganda has done quite a number on brain-washing you to hate. Feminism is based and hate and is very sick.

I don't see you posting about how men are brutalized and killed in every single movie and TV show.

reply

porn?! all you see is girls in short skirts. there's more nudity in winnie the pooh.

reply

Setayeh, I'd just like to point out that feminism is, in fact, based on working for equality between the sexes. It is certainly not based on hate and sexism - quite the opposite. Maybe do your research before tarring us all with the same brush and making grotesque generalisations.

reply

The girls are old enough to wear school uniforms and I found it funny! I mean this is a free world...or so we've been told...but still people still bitch no matter what!

reply

I saw the film and really liked it. It wasn't meant to be taken seriously.

reply

emily_g_35
Setayeh, I'd just like to point out that feminism is, in fact, based on working for equality between the sexes. It is certainly not based on hate and sexism - quite the opposite. Maybe do your research before tarring us all with the same brush and making grotesque generalisations.
Do some research on how the feminists have taken Harvard university under siege. No one is allowed to make statements that every intelligent being knows is true, but is against feminist ideology. This is happening at a place of higher learning where debate and free speech are crucial. Look into gender biased laws against men in family courts. Research how feminists like to alter domestic abuse studies into their favour when many studies in Canada and Europe show that men are usually the victims of abuse and girls usually use weapons to assault men. Feminism is not about equality. Feminism is in fact Marxist. How ironic and hypocritical for western nations that promote democracy to be promoting communism at the same time.

Feminists have been bombarding the media with hate propaganda for over 40 years. Male bashing has become acceptable, but if the genders were reversed, the sick feminists would be foaming at the mouth. emily_g_35, you should stop promoting the sexist feminist hate. Every decent girl has a responsibility to stop the misandrist hate.

reply

[deleted]

katesl1
So what about the fact that two women a week in the UK are killed by their partners? The fact that men still earn more than women in a vast majority of employment areas, for doing exactly the same jobs?
Those are manipulated Feminist hate propaganda for the brain-dead. People who blindly accept the feminist propaganda are completely stupid. Some facts:

The Feminist View Of Domestic Violence vs Scientific Studies By Sam and Bunny Sewell, Family Resources & Research

Female Vs. Male Perpetrated Violence As A %age Of All Respondents:

Minor Violence_______________ % of females % of males
Threw an object (not at partner)_____ 23.6 _____ 15.8
Threaten to throw object __________ 14.9 ______ 7.3
Threw object at partner ___________ 16.2 ______ 4.6
Pushed or grabbed ______________ 19.8 _____ 17.2
Severe Violence
Slapped, punched, kicked _________ 15.8 ______ 7.3
Used weapon ___________________ 3.1 ______ 0.9
Violence as self defense ___________ 9.9 _____ 14.8
Alcohol factor __________________ 8.0 _____ 16.0
My partner needed medical help ____ 14.3 _____ 21.4
Overall Violence ________________ 39.1 _____ 26.3

"As a former prosecutor and divorce lawyer I know that the best deterrent to violence by human beings is arrest, prosecution and appropriate consequences. With well-prepared cases, vigorous prosecution, and no nonsense consequences the cycle of abuse can be broken, no matter who the abuser is. Humans become habitual abusers because they get away with it. It is impossible to make progress in reducing domestic violence until we recognize that women are violent."

Acknowledging That Women Are Abusers Leads To Better Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Women usually initiate spousal violence episodes (they hit first), and women hit more frequently, as well as using weapons three times more often then men. This combination of violent acts means that efforts to find solutions to the family violence problem need to include appropriate focus on female perpetrators. We need to recognize that women are violent, and we need nationwide educational programs that portray women as perpetrators. Other studies show that men are becoming less violent at the same time that women are becoming more violent. Educating men seems to be working. Educating women to be less violent should now be the main thrust of public education programs.

Any family violence program which accepts the "male abuser - female victim" paradigm is based on a false premise. These kind of family violence programs actually perpetuate the problem of abuse and do not deserve to be supported by private citizens or government agencies. Many government agencies, and legitimate charities, have been funding a feminist political cause, rather than funding rational, solution focused, family violence prevention programs.



Men earn less and are excluded from some jobs.
Exploiting the Gender Gap by Warren Farrell
In other fields, men are virtually excluded - try getting hired as a male dental hygienist, nursery school teacher, cocktail waiter. There are 80 jobs in which women earn more than men - positions like financial analyst, speech-language pathologist, radiation therapist, library worker, biological technician, motion picture projectionist. Female sales engineers make 143 percent of their male counterparts; female statisticians earn 135 percent.

reply

Setayeh: firstly, of course there are, and always will be, facets of movements that stray from the original aim and meaning. Think about Muslim extremists - there's nothing in Islam to promote violence and hatred, but there will always be people who use and exploit movements for their own ends. It doesn't mean that all Muslims are terrorists! It's the same with feminism. Some may abuse it, but there are thousands of feminist women and men out there who are trying to achieve equality between the sexes.

Secondly, I apologise if you interpreted my post as to be "promoting the sexist feminist hate" - was it the part where I said that feminism is based on equality that did it? I don't know what more I can say to try and convince you that the true roots and meanings of feminism are solely positive and in absolutely no way based on hate. I deplore both misogynism and misandrism as much as you do. That's why I'm a feminist.

reply

I work part-time at the local cinema in between going sixth form, and I must say there are a lot of "pervy" old men going to see this film by themselves, ha.

reply

emily_g_35, It doesn't mean that all Muslims are terrorists! It's the same with feminism.
The general population wrongly think of all Muslims as Terrorists in the same way they wrongly think Feminism is about Equality. Feminism is based on hate, so all forms of Feminism promotes hate. If you are unclear that all degrees of feminism espouses hate, then you should join the KKK and tell a black person that you are promoting white people's rights and that you are not one of the extreme members of the KKK.

I deplore both misogynism and misandrism as much as you do.
If that is true, then you will support egalitarianism and help to expose the Feminist one-sided sexist hate. Feminism cannot be about equality because the views are one-sided and extremely Misandrist.

reply

I have to agree to some extend with the original post. Girls under 15 shouldn't really be allowed to watch this as it does make it seem ok to act/dress like a slut. If I had a daughter I wouldn't want them to watch this trash.

reply

Firstly this film is great, it was extremely funny,
So were the emos /first years/head girl/ geeks all dressed inappropriately , I’ve seen girls at the convent school across the road from me dressed more slutty. The only ones really dressed like slut was there posh totty and that’s because they are supposed to be sluts! anyone who thinks this was too pornagraphic ovbiously hasnt turned on the Tv lately i mean helloooo this isnt the victorian times.
Either that or you just have sex on the brain as i managed to watch it with out thinking OMG They are sooo sexual.


reply

Still though, you shouldn't really be encouraging young girls to dress this way. I mean helloooo!

reply

Maybe you havent lived around a catholic school.....

reply

I live in Glasgow, home of the Catholic school.
The point is that I'm not saying that there aren't people that dress like this, we just shouldn't encourage young impressionable girls to dress like tarts. Like Bratz dolls, how wrong are they? Why the hell would babies want to wear make up and want diamonds? All these types of toys/films are doing is forcing young kids to grow up too quickly.

reply

"helloooo this isnt the victorian times."

no, it's the mid-00s, when 40% of british girls have sex before the age of 16, when britain comes top of a survey of 40 countries for the most teenage sex, where 6-year-olds are given scantily-clad dolls to coat in makeup, and when the act of sexual intercourse is generally treated by most people with as much reverence as the act of eating a *beep* kit kat.

whoopee! slut power!

reply

[deleted]

How is Feminism Marxist?

reply

p-m westwood, with comments like that it is you who needs locking up. Now if only they could find some fit girls it would have been worth watching, instead of the shoddy pile of stain that it is.

Besides, everyone knows half of them are 18-22, and it's legal to shuffle one out over them.

reply

Besides, everyone knows half of them are 18-22, and it's legal to shuffle one out over them.

hahahhhahhahaha

reply

Sluttery – great word.

But seriously, these films were originally made in the 1950s and were far more explicit back then in terms of the societal boundaries of the time.

The fact that in the original film they all chain smoked, but now that’s not allowed on screen, is indicative of shifting notions of acceptability.

But I hardly think the film is a corrupting influence.

From the original books/film through to Mini The Minx in the Beano comic and Marmalade Atkins on TV in the 1980s the depiction of the misbehaving schoolgirl is a longstanding British tradition.

reply

look i go to a catholic school and compared to that the film was tame! the only girls who dressed anyway slutty were the posh tottys and they were supposed to be sluts...now its your opinion and its up to you what you think "sluttery" is but if this is the idea of it you should lock yourself away and throw away the key...its a film...and a bloody good one at that so stop trying to critisise every little thing and if you dont like it why even come on the page???

reply

I love this film.

I love it so much I have been watching a very bad quality version on the internet almost daily.

But I have to admit I was shocked when I found it was a 12 and not a 15.

The clothes I think are fine but I think that by "Nudity" people mean the 3 scenes in which someone was actually naked and not that some of the clothes are slightly revealing as, as some people have been saying, clothes like this are very common in this age and someone mentioned Bratz dolls and things? This just shows what is considered normal nowadays. Changing this film will not take those things away. There is no hiding from the change. I agree it is bad change and it shouldn't be happening, but it is and changing a film like this is not going to help.

There are much worse films going about than this 1.

Yes there is 3 scenes which someone is naked but the are covered appropriately.

If it is youth today you wish to protest against, maybe this site is not the best place to do it on.

reply

^ Where are you watching it?

reply

http://video.supernovatube.com/play.php?viewkey=119546931

Like I said before the quality isn't great as the picture isn't the best and sometimes the audience drowns out the sound. there are a couple times where someone walks past aswell but I'm still able to follow and it seems to be the
only version going around at the moment.

reply

Sluttery?
"This film is shocking, it promotes sluttery and makes it 'justified' to leer at school girls. Totally immoral. The filmmakers ought to look twice at themselves next time a paedo abuses and rapes an innocent school girl."

You don't get out a hell of a lot, do you?

reply

"The filmmakers ought to look twice at themselves next time a paedo abuses and rapes an innocent school girl."

I hardly think the "posh totty" characters can be catagorised as "innocent school girls" - and last time I checked no-one at my school was wearing a visible suspender belt!

You need to see the film more as a joke exagurating the culture we already live in... any teens wanting to act this promiscuously I'm afraid quite probably already are...in fact ironically they were probably doing it sat behind you in the cinema whilst you were watching this worrying about how it might corrupt them.

reply