Milano's prosthetic body looked more like Rose McGowan
Does anyone else agree?
shareA little bit- alot more than it looked like Milano!
Do guys like "the thing"?
They like it better than no thing.
Well, not so much Milano at least. There were none of her tattoos; dead giveaway that "her body" was CGI.
When the 'sisters' became producers in CHARMED, (season five), the tattoo covering, body makeup, (usually somewhat see-through under the strong studio lighting, including McGowan's shoulder), and 'shooting around' the tattoos generaly ended. Milano's visible tattoos were on her wrist, ankle, stomach, shoulder, and neck (later).
I'm not quite sure about CHARMED season 5 how her tattoos did not appear in her mermaid form, but it absolutely had some CGI covering the transition from her skin to the fake mermaid tail, and she did have her wrist covered.
Without knowing about the tatoos, the "prosthetic body" was very well done though, and actually didn't need to look like anyone in particular. It seriously surprised me when the autopsy began with the "Y" chest incision, and the flesh moved away from the cut. Wow! The silicon prosthetics do not move like that...
"There were none of her tatoos (sic); dead givaway (sic) that "her body" was CGI."
Wow that sounds expensive. If only there were a cheap way to just apply stuff to her skin and cover tattoos.
'Then' and 'than' are completely different words and have completely different meanings.
If only there were a cheap way to just apply stuff to her skin and cover tattoos.They may have used a "green screen" bodysuit, and had the CGI fill in the shape, coloring, and shadows. That would explain how "her body" looked more like Rose McGowan, since a bodysuit would modify her shape. *smile*