Rickes is la egend, doc is a mess


Granted I saw this at a film festival, so more editing may be done
before it's Dec release. However it's a jumbled mess. There are clips
you wonder why they have made it in the film and what if anything how
it pertains to story. It jumps around and slows. Beginning grabs you,
you think you are in for a comedic and insider's ride and it loses its
momentum half way through. Great to see the legend in action and see
some of his peers and predecessors tell stories but overall
disappointment. Read Rickles book if you want to know more on him.

reply

It was filmed this way by the editor and director. I disagree wqith you, the doc is great and one of the funniest things in quite some time.


Vote Democrat

reply

I'm with you bluesguy, I enjoyed this immensely.

reply

Basically, I give the flick a 7.5/10; I would've rated it higher, but Landis spends a little much time on the whole "why Vegas is so much better back in the old days cause of the mob and so on and son" when all that's important here is Rickles. It also could've been even longer- Rickles telling a story, like about the nut who kept on opening the door and mouthing off maniacally and then going back behind the door (I forget the name of the guy he was describing) is great on its own. And every so often Landis would make a strange edit, like a shot that's panning over a new york city street, Scorsese is talking, and it does a quick shot of the director's guild building before dissolving to him talking inside. why not just cut to Scorsese in there?

But, it is worth watching for Rickles alone, the guy's in his 80s and KILLS!



www.zackandmichael.com - No small roles, only small actors.

reply

I agree, All Landis really needed to do was turn on the camera and let Rickles tell stories. The story about the funeral had me laughing so hard, I thought I would pee my pants. And would someone please tell Robin Williams to SHUT THE HELL UP!

reply

I agree, All Landis really needed to do was turn on the camera and let Rickles tell stories.

I have to agree...the film could have used a lot more of Rickles and a lot less of everything else. I have to admit I was a little confused about some of the people Landis chose to interview on Rickles...Sidney Poitier?

reply

This documentary could use a little editing — OK, a *lot* of editing — but the footage of Don on stage and in film is priceless. The clips of other celebs explaining why Don is important are redundant and rather boring, but the documentary is worth it for the clips of Don, which of course should be the whole point. I've been reading a lot of celeb autobiographies lately. I'll have to check out Don's.

reply

I hate how so many newer documentaries have someone redundantly describing something before, during, or after it happens, even though the thing was already self-explanatory. Like when George Lopez explains how Johnny Carson walked backstage to interrupt Rickles' show, but then we see it happen. If you're going to show the clip, you don't need Lopez to do a running commentary that simply tells us what we're seeing. We're intelligent enough to understand that Johnny Carson is walking backstage.

reply

[deleted]

This documentary was a great reminder as to what a great actor Rickles is as well as a comic...he was great in KELLY'S HEROES and he made the most of what he was given to do in CASINO. I had forgotten about his role in THE RAT RACE with Debbie Reynolds and Tony Curtis...that's a great film.

reply

[deleted]

Like when George Lopez explains how Johnny Carson walked backstage to interrupt Rickles' show, but then we see it happen.


Yeah, what was the point of Lopez, explaining it, showing the clip, and then have even further comment from Lopez?

reply