any good?


worth it?

reply

I was hoping for an answer to this question too seeing as it's just been posted on the sites today.

Going on the trailer alone I think it's going to be in the 'so bad it's good' category. Why is a shot of a CF kissing someone closed mouthed worthy of a highlight for the trailer??????????

Well it's worth some bandwidth seeing as it's a slow day, and I do enjoy 'so bad it's good' movies. If I get round to watching it I'll come back and let you know.

reply

i made it 19 minutes before i shut it off..hope that helps..

reply

It was so badly directed that I was feeling actual physical sickness.

So...anyhow... I fast forwarded just to get the plot over with.

Plus... Susie Feldman had a body double I believe for this quick nude scene.
Her acting is atrocious. Cory is alright...miles above anyone involved in this movie...kinda confused why he even bothered with this garbage. As much as he may not be the A lister... he's worth more than this junk.


http://www.vimeo.com/1986276
http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom

reply

Thanks for the honest reviews!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Dutch-boy, FYI: it's steaming on Netflix.

reply

[deleted]

It is patently obvious that you are the writer/director, Jozef Lenders. Mr Lenders, if you wish to become a better artist, you must learn to take constructive criticism to grow. You can not attack people for stating their opinion. With that in mind, I am going to be as tactful as possible. The dialogue just did not ring true, it seemed forced and implausible. Corey Feldman has a lot of experience but he could not do anything to save this ill-fated project. The acting was pretty bad with Joe Abby being the worst of the main cast. From his IMDb listing, it seems that he is primarily an extra--this proves that there is a viable reason for that. The plot is inconsistent and the film meanders, from a treatise on good versus evil to a mad scientist to a government conspiracy. The ending was too formulaic and simplistic. The special effects, while causing most reasonable viewers to squirm in their seats, looked inauthentic. The fake blood was the wrong consistency and at times even the wrong color. I am sorry but this was a bad movie and there is very little that I found appealing about it. I am sure that when you finished this film, you realized that it would only appeal to a small niche. This is your first film and I am sure if you had the opportunity, there are some things that you would do differently. If you want to argue with me and ask my credentials to render such a review, I will be pleased to share them with you. There are actually some people who liked your film, check some of the viewer's reviews on Netflix.

reply

Apparently, Joe Lenders (a.k.a. really-serious-guy) withdrew his posts after my critique.

reply

Apparently, really-serious-guy (a.k.a. Joe Lenders) has withdrawn his posts after my comments.

reply

You do know that your rantings make you seem volatile and unstable, don't you? This could alienate potential audiences for any future projects you may release.

reply

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uLDOLF42jk

This reviewer liked it.


I wasn't there to read his rant. So I don't know if it was the director or not...

The movie got some recognition by some, and others didn't like it.

He shouldn't have came himself and blasted the haters.

And like you said some people liked his film, and posted nice thing on that other web site.

It probably hurted his feeling and over-reacted.

Silly of him he should move on and try to make his money back.

I didn't see it but I want to give it a shot, Corey Feldman is a good actor.

reply

It was a very small production movie, dialogue is a bit off and acting is cheesy. I enjoyed it for it was.

reply