MovieChat Forums > The Year of Getting to Know Us (2008) Discussion > At Sundance Film Festival January 17-27,...

At Sundance Film Festival January 17-27,2008


Don't know the exact dates/times but I know it will play at the festival in Park City,Utah,then go either to theaters or DVD later in 2008.

reply

it better come to theatres!!!

"It's when in Rome. This is Paris, and you're drunk."
-Chevy Chase, European Vacation

reply

[deleted]

did you see it and what did you think ? for that matter who saw it at the festival ?

reply

Damnit I'm tired of waiting!! This needs to get into theatres very very soon!!!

Whenever I see clowns, I always think of their relatives and how dissapointed they must be

reply

I saw the world premiere of this film at Sundance and it is seriously one of the five worst films I have ever seen in my lifetime. During the Q&A (in which Sisam, Fallon, Stone, Arnold and Hale were present), no one in the audience had anything worth saying because the film was so awful. It was an embarrassing moment.

Jimmy Fallon is one dimensional. Lucy Liu is good, but her role has no meat-- it's sad that these are the only parts she is given. Tom Arnold is not an actor and never has been. Sharon Stone is caricaturish. Illeana Douglas and Tony Hale give the best performances, but in minor roles. What most people don't know about this film is that the director cuts back and forth between the present and the past at least twenty times-- an overused technique that not even the most mundane film students resort to these days. This forces Arnold and Stone, who play Fallon's parents, to carry a major portion of the film in the flashbacks.

There is rarely a truthful moment in the film. The script is contrived. The cliché ending can be seen in the average Hollywood romantic comedy. I hope this director grows in maturity before he writes or directs another film. He had the budget and resources at his fingertips, but blew his opportunity because he wasn't properly equipped.

Which Sundance programmer allowed this film to be shown? They should be ashamed of themselves. The work speaks for itself and it clearly falls short. I'd hate to think that the programmer was being wooed by the producer's rep or other people behind the film without considering the ramifications of screening something of this quality at Sundance. Is this what Redford's vision has come to?

reply