Read Wikipedia? Are you serious?
I highly recommend reading the Wiki after viewing the Doc see Link Here
That is the singular most ridiculous thing i've heard. Wiki can be edited by ANYONE, so by reading it, there is no way you are suddenly so much more able to judge the situation and pronounce her guilty or innocent. Much similar to anyone watching this film and believing her innocent, or viewing the ridiculous 'documentary' "Schapelle Corby: the Hidden Truth" and believing her guilty.
Media is manipulated and edited so much, in order to make an audience see a certain view. Unless you were there with Schapelle during the time leading up to and including the discovery of the Marijuana in her bag, you have no reason what so ever to judge.
If you are one of the people who one day think her innocent, and then read an article on the internet the next that CONVINCES you she is guilty, you need a reality check.
Would you believe the TV if they told you that jumping of the Sydney Harbor Bridge was beneficial to your health? No. (At least I hope not)
As Rdw246 said in another thread:
Frankly it doesn't matter to me if she did it or not when they had no evidence to convict her. Any evidence they did have should of been thrown out since it was apparently contaminated with people touching it etc. You have no proof=no way you can send someone to prison for 20 years.
I am not saying she is innocent. Nor am i saying she is guilty. I have no clue. All I'm saying, is that no-one should be imprisoned for a crime, unless it is proved-BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT- that he/she is guilty.
And no-one should be judging her situation. Its not up to you to do so.
T~O #267 R~M
you just lost the game
I fat books...and K
share