MovieChat Forums > 44 Inch Chest (2010) Discussion > Harold Pinter Connection

Harold Pinter Connection


Try watching something written by Harold Pinter, preferably the film of one of his plays, and you'll see the inspiration for that type of dialogue. ~ PamerEldritch in Interrogation - Spoilers

I was struck by the number of similarities between the film and Pinter's plays.

The interrogation scene mentioned by perch1 could be seen as a nod toward the interrogation scene in Pinter's The Birthday Party, in which Goldberg and McCann grill Stanley, using a combination of apparently inconsequential humour and ominous malevolent threats.

In The Homecoming Ruth sides with, and agrees to stay with, her husband's dysfunctional English family rather than to return to America with him.

In 44 Inch Chest Liz Diamond appears (out of the blue and bearing no sign of her earlier beating) and takes sides with Colin's friends, even to the extent where she appears to have Old Man Peanut's head on her body.

Liz's cigarette lighting sequence with Mal echoes the glass of water scene between Ruth and Lenny in The Homecoming as well. In both cases the women are seductively demonstrating their power over the men, especially so in Liz's case, who seems to be even taunting her watching husband. Ruth similarly taunts her husband when she and his younger brother embrace and roll onto the floor in front of him.

The film's main setting, a dreary, run-down room in an almost derelict house in London, is Pinteresque as well, as is the group of Colin's distinctly individual friends, one suavely menacing; one old, ranting and profane; a nattily dressed young "gent" with the gift of the gab; a calm middle man who watches, saying little.

Not only Pinter's Goldberg and McCann, but also Max, Sam, Lenny and Joey (The Homecoming) and Foster and Briggs (No Man's Land) could be their ancestors.

I thought the witty, profanity-littered repartee between Colin's pals Meredith, Archie, Mal and Old Man Peanut was hilarious. Black, potentially menacing, but hilarious.


reply

I was twenty minutes into this bewildering movie when I turned to my husband to ask, "Was this written by Harold Pinter?"
The dialogue--and there was a lot of it--was frequently highly contrived and very theatrical, and the quick camera cuts that accompanied it only accentuated it. The film was by turns unrealistic and surrealistic. It had an absolutely stunning cast, but Ray Winstone's character was the only one who was believable, and he was entirely unsympathetic. I just didn't understand what the movie was: Did Colin imagine everything that transpired after his wife crawled out of the house? Were his companions projections of his conflicted emotions? The tagline refers to Colin as a gangster, but we're never given any indisputably factual information about any aspect of his life. Even the children the others refer to are only mentioned halfway through the film, and never directly seen.
Because I couldn't be confident what portion was really occurring, I didn't feel any suspense or dread--mostly what I felt was impatience.
I'm interested in other interpretations.

reply

http://imdb.com/title/tt0914837/board/flat/154938294

You may want to check out threads like the one above to see others' discussion of the film.



reply

Thanks for that link, Mrs. Because the post is a bit old (chagrin), it didn't show on the list of posts I saw. I've duly migrated there!

reply

I absolutely agree. Couldn't believe the similarities, especially when they are interrogating Loveboy and yelling one-word phrases at him. It was so totally inspired by Pinter. And yet, nobody mentions his name in the extras.

reply