MovieChat Forums > Head Case (2007) Discussion > Plot points and story arch (SPOILERS)

Plot points and story arch (SPOILERS)


Last night I saw "Head Case" at the Newark Film Festival and was impressed by the lead actors performances (especially Paul McCloskey's) and the overarching ideas/themes presented in the movie....that said I was confused by several story elements in the movie:

1) The beginning of the movie establishes that the character Wayne is entering into retirement from killing to raise a family. The remainder of the movie is Wayne coming out of retirement to kill again but this time allowing his wife, Andrea, to participate. For an experienced serial killer, wouldn't he be more careful in the way he performed the murders, i.e. location of kill (his own bathtub?!), location of mutilation (carpeted basement den?!), method in which the bodies are mutilated (randomly cutting out bits of flesh). Wayne has no pattern in his kills, no M.O., no "ritual", no other reason to kill people than to rub cheese graters (and other implements) on their genitals. Also, Wayne claims that he wants his victims to feel pain, but half the victims are out cold (or dead already) before he begins the vivisection. In short, Wayne is a pretty half-ass serial killer that should have been caught long before this movie takes place.

2) This is my interpretation of what happens in the movie: after Wayne kills a woman in the 3rd act without the assistance of his wife, an emotional split starts to develop between the two killers. Wayne's "Christmas present" to his wife (a victim that Andrea can kill herself) is actually a way for Wayne to frame Andrea for a murder so he can leave her and start killing again by himself. The cops that arrive to arrest her were tipped off by either Wayne or his son, landing her behind bars and allowing Wayne to kill solo like he actually wanted. THIS sounds like an interesting ending and corresponds neatly with the sex/murder dynamic of their relationship (instead of sexual intercourse, they murder people together; so what happens when they break up? one frames the other for murder), but according to the post-movie Q&A, none of my above theory holds true. This is disappointing because the movie in my mind’s eye was somewhat more compelling than the movie that was actually intended…

3) [Minor bits]

a) In a scene where Wayne is watching a movie from a previous kill on his Dell computer (maybe 20 mins into the movie), the home movie shows three people: Wayne, his wife Andrea, and the victim. Who is shooting the home movie?

b) After a failed pick up attempt of a victim, it appears that the same actor that plays this lucky person also plays one of the detectives at the end that arrests Andrea. Assuming he is one and the same actor, is it meant to be the same "person" in the reality of the movie (i.e. the guy Wayne attempts to pick up IS a detective). If so, why wouldn't the detective and Andrea recognize each other immediately? If it is the same actor, but different "persons", I found this jarring to the suspended reality the movie tried to create. And if, in fact, it's two completely different people, ignore this last section.

Overall, good attempt, good work on the part of the leads (although "victims" could've used more rehearsal time), and good technical work with the camera (considering the limited technology used).

reply

4) What is Wayne's purpose in filming his crimes? To watch them again later? To review his techniques and improve? Whatever the reason may be, why does he record his kills and his family on the same tapes? Can he not distinguish between the horror of his murders and the banality of his family life? All interesting questions concerning the motive(s) of the killer that are never discussed in the movie.

reply

Hello,

It was good talking to you at the Q&A last night at the festival - and I read your feedback and will take this opportunity to answer your questions:

1.) Though it wasn't something we specifically addressed in the film, we made sure not to make Wayne your "typical" serial killer. He doesn't have an M.O. or a ritual because he simply sees killing as a hobby, as normal to him as taking a walk in the park or going to a baseball game. In this case, it was his sex (or essentially, his masturbation). He doesn't consider it his "life's work" like many serial killers do. Wayne was not conceptualized as your typical, run-of-the-mill serial killer. As far as Wayne's "carelessness" regarding where he commits the murders: in his mind, he feels like he can do no wrong. What he does worked in the past, so it should work now. He feels like he's ahead of the game. Even though the audience knows better...the film is told through Wayne's point of view. And Wayne's desire for his victims to feel pain is undermined by his caution regarding allowing his victims to be awake during the mutilations. In his mind, he's inflicting pain even though his victims are already unconscious (or in some cases, semi-conscious).

2.) We didn't specifically address if the son really knew what was going on with his parents...or if Wayne knew that the police were about to come arrest Andrea. This was done for the purposes of ambiguity. In the interrogation scene, the detective specifically says that someone that Andrea knows came to the police station and ratted them out. But he doesn't say who. Either way, in the subsequent scene when Wayne is picking up the male hustler, he doesn't seem really bothered by Andrea's arrest. Maybe it's because he was realizing that Andrea was taking over everything and it was a way to push her out of it? Maybe not. It's not something I specifically wanted to address...it's best left for the viewer to draw his/her own conclusion.

3.) a. the scene that Wayne is watching on his computer was originally the very first murder in the film - the victim was their boarder Richard that they mention early on. However, the scene was cut for technical reasons, so I decided to include it in Wayne's review of his footage. What isn't clear about that scene since the sound was removed was that the son Todd was actually shooting that scene.

b. You are the very first person to pick up on that. That character is one and the same. And the reason that he didn't recognize Andrea is this: Wayne may not have been with Andrea the night he was trying to pick the lucky non-victim up. He just may have been with someone else...in other words, Wayne may have been cheating on Andrea.

4.) Wayne's purpose in filming his murders is basically the same as if a couple were to tape themselves having sex. It's his sexual thrill - his masturbation in a way. It's unclear as to if Wayne actually shoots his family home movies and his murders on the same tapes. The film just states that it's edited from the home movies of Wayne & Andrea Montgomery. But it doesn't specifically state that it's from the same source material. It's just been compiled into some sort of narrative form.

A minor note: some of the victims were instructed to act as if they were lying...especially with the bleach victim. Her character actually ended up being connected to someone that Wayne & Andrea meet up with later on in the movie...but that scene was cut.

Hope these answer your questions! Thank you again for the feedback, I really appreciate it!

Anthony Spadaccini
www.myspace.com/headcasemovie

reply