Plot points and story arch (SPOILERS)
Last night I saw "Head Case" at the Newark Film Festival and was impressed by the lead actors performances (especially Paul McCloskey's) and the overarching ideas/themes presented in the movie....that said I was confused by several story elements in the movie:
1) The beginning of the movie establishes that the character Wayne is entering into retirement from killing to raise a family. The remainder of the movie is Wayne coming out of retirement to kill again but this time allowing his wife, Andrea, to participate. For an experienced serial killer, wouldn't he be more careful in the way he performed the murders, i.e. location of kill (his own bathtub?!), location of mutilation (carpeted basement den?!), method in which the bodies are mutilated (randomly cutting out bits of flesh). Wayne has no pattern in his kills, no M.O., no "ritual", no other reason to kill people than to rub cheese graters (and other implements) on their genitals. Also, Wayne claims that he wants his victims to feel pain, but half the victims are out cold (or dead already) before he begins the vivisection. In short, Wayne is a pretty half-ass serial killer that should have been caught long before this movie takes place.
2) This is my interpretation of what happens in the movie: after Wayne kills a woman in the 3rd act without the assistance of his wife, an emotional split starts to develop between the two killers. Wayne's "Christmas present" to his wife (a victim that Andrea can kill herself) is actually a way for Wayne to frame Andrea for a murder so he can leave her and start killing again by himself. The cops that arrive to arrest her were tipped off by either Wayne or his son, landing her behind bars and allowing Wayne to kill solo like he actually wanted. THIS sounds like an interesting ending and corresponds neatly with the sex/murder dynamic of their relationship (instead of sexual intercourse, they murder people together; so what happens when they break up? one frames the other for murder), but according to the post-movie Q&A, none of my above theory holds true. This is disappointing because the movie in my mind’s eye was somewhat more compelling than the movie that was actually intended…
3) [Minor bits]
a) In a scene where Wayne is watching a movie from a previous kill on his Dell computer (maybe 20 mins into the movie), the home movie shows three people: Wayne, his wife Andrea, and the victim. Who is shooting the home movie?
b) After a failed pick up attempt of a victim, it appears that the same actor that plays this lucky person also plays one of the detectives at the end that arrests Andrea. Assuming he is one and the same actor, is it meant to be the same "person" in the reality of the movie (i.e. the guy Wayne attempts to pick up IS a detective). If so, why wouldn't the detective and Andrea recognize each other immediately? If it is the same actor, but different "persons", I found this jarring to the suspended reality the movie tried to create. And if, in fact, it's two completely different people, ignore this last section.
Overall, good attempt, good work on the part of the leads (although "victims" could've used more rehearsal time), and good technical work with the camera (considering the limited technology used).