Anyone else think this film was actually a whitewash?

As in, its probably much worse over there? He didn't even cover Abu Ghraib and the Taguba report. I think its going to be a very long time before we see a truly objective film on this subject. Keep in mind the western media covered up the fact that there was any kind of armed resistance for quite a long time. The facts that are starting to come out now through books and film seem to prove that the reality of the situation is far worse than even the most radical antiwar agitators have been making it out to be over the past few years. He also didn't get into the "troop surge", the idea that 140,000 troops cannot stabilize and pacify 25 million people, but 170,000 would be able to no problem.


maybe its just me
Last Movies seen:

INLAND EMPIRE:9.55/10
Shooter:6.73/10
The Good Shepherd:7.89/10