MovieChat Forums > For the Bible Tells Me So (2007) Discussion > A comment regarding Christians and non-C...

A comment regarding Christians and non-Christians on homosexuality.


I don't know about other places, but here in eastern North Carolina, I seem to observe that Christians are far more tolerant of homosexuals than the average unfaithful person. I hear more disgusting speech about gays from the non-Christians. I just don't see the "they will burn in hell" rhetoric from Christians. They mostly disagree with the lifestyle but I never here Christians uttering *beep* or things of that nature. I also here a lot of anti-gay rhetoric in the high school I teach at and it comes from students who certainly do not attend church. I just think there is a stereotype that gays and gay supporters have about Christians.

reply

Yes you're right. There is an "exaggerated" stereotype, in the sense that all Christians are labeled as what you describe, "anti-gay rhetoric." But let's not forget about Westboro Baptist Church. That's one of the major sources for this stereotype, which ultimately, leads to the "overgeneralized blanket" statements lumped together against all Christians.

reply

[deleted]

No, not all Christians are labeled as such.
[sigh of relief]
Thanks for proving me wrong.

Coral Ridge Ministries
Focus on the Family
The Moral Majority
Concerned Women for America
American Family Association
Christian Research Institute
American Center for Law and Justice
Christian Coalition
Family Research Council
Heritage Foundation
Traditional Values Coalition
Thanks for pointing that out. Within the Christian community, they deserve love the least but need it the most, I think.

reply

[deleted]

There's definitely a spectrum of homosexual theology. Westboro Baptists are probably at one end, and then this movie is probably the other end, and then you have people mixed in throughout.

My church is pretty compassionate and loving and progressive but their official stance is still "homosexuality is a sin". Eh... I still think "I love you, I just don't love your sin" is pretty ignorant since their sexuality is core to their identity and you're still making them feel like there's something wrong with them. It's still better than "God hates fags" but I don't think it's very profound. That's why I like this movie.


I'm just waiting for the sun to shine.

reply

[deleted]

I don't know about other places, but here in eastern North Carolina, I seem to observe that Christians are far more tolerant of homosexuals than the average unfaithful person. I hear more disgusting speech about gays from the non-Christians. I just don't see the "they will burn in hell" rhetoric from Christians. They mostly disagree with the lifestyle but I never here Christians uttering *beep* or things of that nature. I also here a lot of anti-gay rhetoric in the high school I teach at and it comes from students who certainly do not attend church. I just think there is a stereotype that gays and gay supporters have about Christians.



It seems some people who hate gays for whatever reason, are trying to misuse the Bible to justify their hatred. If those people are so worried about 'sexual sins' why aren't attcking heterosexuals who partake in pre-marital sex or commit adultery?? God hates SIN, not the sinner.



If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it copy this and make it your signature!

reply

First of all, stereotyping Christian fundamentalists isn't the same as stereotyping Christians. Plenty of us non-fundamentalist Christians are sick to death of being pulled into their pet crusades.

Second, homophobia in the religious right rarely takes the form of the "God hates fags" cross-burning fanaticism that we associate with "hate". Rather it's the knee-jerk "ewwww" reaction and treatment of gays as lepers that I disagree with. It's not raw seething hatred, but it's just as damaging.

Thirdly, although I know most religious conservatives aren't haters, I simply can't say the same of their leadership. In the eighties, the religious right gleefully endorsed the idea that AIDS was caused by homosexuality; Mike Huckabee, their current political hero, openly called homosexuality "a public health risk" and advocated isolating all AIDS patients from the general public. After 9/11, you had Falwell and Robertson going on television and saying that God had allowed the attacks to punish America's "tolerance" of homosexuals. I don't care what their religion is, there's no word for that other than "hate".

My basic objection to the anti-gay movement is simple; it holds gay people to a standard of sexual morality that they refuse to enforce on straight people. Homosexuals can't serve in the military - why? Because our military has "strong Christian values"? There are plenty of people in the military who have divorced, committed adultery, or had sex before marriage; all of these things are sins according to the Bible. Are we talking about removing them from active duty? Of course not. So why are the rules different for gays? How do you expect people to see that as anything other than a prejudice?


Denny Crane.

reply

I'm not defending Falwell or others mainly because I don't watch them, but there is something very peculiar that I DID notice.

Have you ever noticed that the media and celebrities who are supposed to be so gay-friendly are the WORST perpetrators of homophobia?

Watch late night comedians Jay Leno (reruns)Letterman, etc and notice how many times they make little (harmless?)jokes about gays. Why is it okay to make Lance Bass or Clay Aiken jokes JUST because they're gay?

Or look at movies and TV and see how many times the straight people in them react negatively or perpatuate a sterotype towards homosexuality. You don't think THAT culture is MUCH more damning towards homosexuals than a few fundamentalists? At least THEY are not being hypocritical...we KNOW where they stand on the issue, but Hollywood claims to be gay-friendly, except when they are using gay stereotypes to get laughs. Why do you think you rarely (if ever) see a masculine gay man on TV?? Why are they always the 'screaming queens' or the emotional best friend that cries?? Have a gay man sit next to Chandler on "Friends" and watch his reaction...and of course the audience just laughs and laughs because a 'ewwwww' gay man sat next to a 'normal' person! This is much more pervasive and dangereous than anything the religious right may have done. This homophobia disguised as 'humour' is rampant in our media ...and yet nobody says anything about it. Why?


If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it copy this and make it your signature!

reply

I don't think it's ignored, certainly not by the gay community. Just overshadowed.

Was Song of the South racially insensitive towards black people, in the same way you're describing? Probably; certainly most people today would say so. Was it in the same category as what Charles Coughlin and Gerald L. K. Smith were saying during that same time period? Not even close.


Denny Crane.

reply

I don't think it's ignored, certainly not by the gay community. Just overshadowed.


I have to disagree mon ami...if it weren't ignored, we should see a major outcry
against it. But even if it wasn't ignored, just overshadowed as you say, can you explain WHY??? There's no shortage of media attention on a religious person who states they believe homosexuality is wrong, yet it's practically a media blackout when holllywood does it. For example, tonight I watched Family Guy and American Dad..two popular shows especially with young males. Well, on BOTH shows, the effeminate gay stereotypes were perpetuated, and the jokes
in Family Guy were basically because Peter was 'gay'...he talked differently,
he was much more effeminate etc. Also, he becomes gay because of medical experiments where certain genes are implanted into him...one caused him to become a squirrel, and he was totally fine with that...but he initially balked and had reservations about becoming gay. Now, don't get me wrong...I'm not some tight-a$$ who can't take a joke, but you have to understand the underlying message that is being perpetuated...it's STILL okay to laugh at someone just because they're gay. WHy is it wrong for the alleged 'religious right' to do it, but it's not only okay, but condoned when hollywood does it???

I HATE hypocrisy...and hollywood appears to be the biggest hypocritical community I know.

Was Song of the South racially insensitive towards black people, in the same way you're describing? Probably; certainly most people today would say so. Was it in the same category as what Charles Coughlin and Gerald L. K. Smith were saying during that same time period? Not even close.


You're missing the point. I'm not comparing gay jokes from 50 years ago to today...I'm saying the hollywood community is the worst offender of promoting gay stereotypes and jokes about homosexuals...yet they are the first to condemn a religious person for stating their beliefs. Look what happened to Miss California and all she did was give her opinion...something she SHOULD Be entitled to and to which apparently over 50% of the U.S population share.
Yet "South Park' makes fun of gays and people call it 'artistic' Hypocritical.


If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it copy this and make it your signature!

reply

Sorry for the late response.

"But even if it wasn't ignored, just overshadowed as you say, can you explain WHY??? There's no shortage of media attention on a religious person who states they believe homosexuality is wrong, yet it's practically a media blackout when holllywood does it"

Because it's a JOKE. In bad taste? Sometimes, yes. But the religious right isn't making jokes, they're making actual policy recommendations. See Huckabee's "Let's take AIDS patients and isolate them from the public" and accusing homosexuals of "posing a dangerous public health risk" - and he said this in 1992, after a decade of AIDS research after which he damn well should have known better. Other policy recommendations for today include DOMA, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and forbidding gays from adopting.

None of that makes Hollywood right, but the gay rights movement had to pick their battles. I can't imagine they're happy with the Family Guy jokes, but it's considerably less important than being prevented from marrying the person you love, prevented from adopting any children, prevented from exercising your freedom even while you fight for it, or, if Mike Huckabee had had his way, being totally segregated from the general public.

I imagine that if and when the gay rights movement gets the rights it wants, it will in fact shift its focus to "soft" homophobia, the same way that after the Civil Rights Act, the civil rights movements shifted their focus from changing the law to exiling demeaning images of blacks from the public square.


Denny Crane.

reply

imagine that if and when the gay rights movement gets the rights it wants, it will in fact shift its focus to "soft" homophobia

But I would argue that the 'soft' homophobia is a large contributor to the overall homophobia of society. The media is pervasive and very, very powerful. It's everywhere, and in a culture where such jokes are accepted and thought of as the norm, people will be ingrained with this mindset, and it will lead to or at least reinforce the decisions they make.

If the media is always driving home the ideas of gay people as targets of derision and jokes, as inferior humans, I would think it would make it much harder for the population to accept gays as regular people, and this would contribute to their unwillingness to allow things such as gay marriage. It's therefore not some sort of superficial level of homophobia, and might even be a major driving force for the more major aspects of it. The media reinforces their current homophobia and convinces them that everyone else thinks the same way and are therefore probably right. It supports the image of gays as disgusting and perverse, even in a joking way, and makes it seem more reasonable and acceptable to want to rid them from society or strip them of their rights.

----
www.whoaisnotme.net/

reply

Have you ever noticed that the media and celebrities who are supposed to be so gay-friendly are the WORST perpetrators of homophobia?

Yeah. What you said about the hypocrisy. Although maybe it's the issue of how Hollywood is not exactly one single entity; within it there are individuals who may have differing views.

----
www.whoaisnotme.net/

reply

RParmly-3 wrote:

My basic objection to the anti-gay movement is simple; it holds gay people to a standard of sexual morality that they refuse to enforce on straight people.


You NAILED it!

I cannot tell you how many times I've heard the argument that "gays are more promiscuous, so they don't deserve the right to marriage". Does this question come up when it comes to whether or not heterosexual people should be allowed to marry? Of course not.

How about the procreation/marriage thing? Does the fact that some heterosexual people are incapable of/unwilling to have children cause people to question whether or not heterosexual people should be 'allowed' to marry? Of course not.

And yet, time and time again, these higher/more stringent standards are applied to same-sex couples ALL the time.


The anti-gay people are never able to justify this double-standard.

reply

[deleted]

I suppose it can go both ways, and it depends on your environment and perspective. Certainly, people who are homophobic and claim to be Christian don't hesitate to misinterpret and twist the Bible to make claims that God and Jesus hate gay people.

As a non-denominational person of faith, I cannot believe these people fathom a higher being with such venom in His heart for his children. Nor do I understand their misdirected vitrolic efforts against gay people when there are so many other more important causes in this world that call out to us.

"First you ask if you can be red, knowing that I'm always red."

reply

"Plenty of us non-fundamentalist Christians are sick to death of being pulled into their pet crusades."

I know, right!
I hate it when the right wing conservatives make us all look bad.
It makes me want to scream!

When I was younger I used to wonder why people hated Christians so much.
As I got older I began to understand why.

I thank God that I went to the school I did...it's a liberal arts school, and it was there in which I shed my homophobia.
Now it's gone and good riddance TO IT!

"I still think "I love you, I just don't love your sin" is pretty ignorant since their sexuality is core to their identity and you're still making them feel like there's something wrong with them. It's still better than "God hates fags" but I don't think it's very profound."

That's one of the reasons I chose to accept and support LGBT's.
It's like saying, "God loves you, but..."

No, God loves people PERIOD!


-Amanda

"She will remember your heart when men are fairy tales in storybooks written by rabbits"

reply

[deleted]