MovieChat Forums > Constantine's Sword (2008) Discussion > Seems to be a downrating campaign

Seems to be a downrating campaign


Most of the reviews of this movie are clustered between 7 and 10, but roughly one-third of viewers give it 1's. This suggests to me that some people -- no doubt a crowd that believes _Expelled_ deserves an Oscar -- are aggressively downrating _Constantine's Sword_ because they're pissed off by this movie and don't want anyone to go see it.

reply

[deleted]

I thought it felt a lot like Jewish propaganda. It's certainly not a great movie. Could that explain the low rating?

reply

It's a DOCUMENTARY, not a 'movie' and that's why the rating is never high.

reply

Jewish propaganda?
Please explain.

reply

You expect someone with the same mindset as Adolf Hitler to explain, and even if they had, do you honestly expect it to be rational?

reply

I'm Jewish and also felt it was, to some extent, "Jewish propaganda". The speil about how, once Carroll found out that Jews were killed in the Crusades, it hit him like a bombshell and completely changed his world view, was peculiar. Had only Muslims been killed, apparently the Crusades would have been entirely copacetic for him. Also the whole issue of antisemitism, according to Carroll, having no conceivable relationship to Jewish behavior was kind of heavy-handed. I had to turn it off about half way through but might watch the rest tonight.

reply

People like that are the reason antisemitism exists.

People like you are the only hope for extinguishing it.

reply

If that's true we're in a HEAP a trouble *ba da Boom*
But thanks ;)

reply

[deleted]

I gave this a 7/10 probably just because of the Dylan songs. Other than that the indignation on this guys face in EVERY shot was a little overbearing. He must have had that looked glued on or something, or maybe there is something to that old wives tell your mom used to tell you.

First the starting point was garbage, I mean when has [u]majority[/u] culture not overruled minorities or subculture?? No one should be that shocked if a black kid that comes to a predominately white school isn't pressured to listen to britney spears or Nickelback! They live around crazy mega churches, that *beep* should be expected. It doesn't mean it's right, but then neither was it right for kids to harass or tease me either, or for the VAST majority. It's called life, get a grip. The only adverse thing that should be examined is the tactics for conversion by eternal damnation. That's not fair, and there isn't a real follower of Christ that reads the Bible and can simultaneously use his/her brain that thinks this is acceptable. It's like the argument for torture. We know it doesn't work, why is it still used?? You might scare someone to christ, but then they turn out like Dawkins or worse, Haggard. -


Was the first Jew he interviewed just some random guy? What was his deal? You could tell that instead of saying non-jews, he wanted to desperately say Christians. And then, probably the most bizarre incident of the entire movie was the "Bible Scholar" lady. "Jesus definitely saw himself as a devout Jew. a prophet and was called Rabbi." Well if that isn't the understatement of the entire movie. Yes "Bible Scholar" he was in fact a Jewish Rabbi, in fact, THE Jewish Rabbi, and in fact the LAST Jewish Rabbi, the Jewish Rabbi that was promised to be the unblemished sacrifice for sin, once and for all, no more temple, no more tradition, the complete fulfillment of the scripture. To her it's "an extraordinary twist," of what happened for people to accuse the Jews of killing the Messiah. Basically she recounts that Jewish leaders arrested him, tried him and then sentenced him to death and they "duped" the Roman authorities to kill him. Whereupon Mr. Indignant poses the bizarre question of if it is "true to history". Where she replies, "It looks completely at odds with what we know about history." Interesting. She says that if you read the Gospels you will come to think that it was the Jews that engineered it. Huh? With such a blanket, vague answer she seems to vilify the whole of the new testament. Even treating it as less than a legitimate historical source, which is most odd, considering it is THE single best source we have of the entire occasion. Perhaps she is a scholar of the Jehovas Witness transcription or maybe even of the Catholic Bible, who knows where she's getting these things. Jewish government at the time bordered on Theocracy and an Oligarchy. From which came the plot to get the Romans to crucify Jesus, I'm not sure how she missed this or thinks this is inconsistent with history considering that is exactly what you would expect from this particular pecuilar government in Isreal so the death wouldn't be on them for moral and political reasons. It's completely consistent with history, especially first century Jewish history. The problem with this particular set up with the "Bible Scholar" is it sets up a straw man for most of the movie. A veritable handful of Jews convinced other Jews and the Romans one man should be put to death. We are deceived by George Bush all the time, so one can reason this is in fact consistent with reality. Not every Jew, especially followers and sympathizers, such as Joseph of Arimathaea would have been agreed to this, probably most weren't.

The point is, Jesus was a Jew, who else would have conspired to kill him? I don't remember reading anywhere he was an international criminal? If you go to a church that espouses nonsense as this straw man, it's a good indication you're going to the wrong church. In fact, it can be used as a measuring stick for churches. A very, very basic fundamental rule of thumb. Don't go there if they espouse racism or hate of any kind. (Kind of obvious imo)

One of my favorite quotes of the movie to show how ignorant this guy is:
"If Jesus would have died here, it wouldn't have been as savior of the
world. But as an unknown jew with a number on his arm."

On a lighter note, besides the obvious leaps in logic, I always enjoy a good history lesson with great cinematography. I'm not sure what conclusion, other than 'religion and politics don't mix' (that's fairly obvious too, imo) and that you should stay away from evangelicals, because once they gain a foothold every Jew or Muslim isn't sacred.

He wanted to know the root cause of anti-semitism. The main cause is the Catholic Church and they began on a premise of successive power on a single verse in the new testament about Peter that only existed in their minds. It's really a shame Catholics are called Christians tbh, they worship crackers, do magic, worship all manner of idols, especially Mary, destroy culture and grasp at enormous power. I'm more scared of any Power hungry religion than sincere evangelicals desiring your longevity.

end rant.

reply

He wanted to know the root cause of anti-semitism. The main cause is the Catholic Church and they began on a premise of successive power on a single verse in the new testament about Peter that only existed in their minds. It's really a shame Catholics are called Christians tbh, they worship crackers, do magic, worship all manner of idols, especially Mary, destroy culture and grasp at enormous power. I'm more scared of any Power hungry religion than sincere evangelicals desiring your longevity.


Wow, you're ignorant!

The fact is that this movie attacked Evangelicals for contributing to anti-Semitism as much (if not more) than it attacked Catholicism. This is apparently in response to criticisms of his book, for attacking his Church so much that it was becoming a propaganda tool for anti-Catholics to use against the faith.

The fact is that the "root cause" of anti-semitism comes from cultural and religious issues. The Christian variant of anti-semitism comes from anti-Judaism which is read out of the New Testament. "The Jews" are attacked quite often and quite viciously in the NT. This isn't a problem until one steps OUT of the Jewish milieu from which these texts were written and emerged (it was an "in house" argument... Jews debated with each other on such terms quite often, with the rhetoric becoming very harsh towards those co-religionists they disagreed with, just check out the language of the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Prophetic literature in the Hebrew bible!).

Once Christianity becomes predominately Gentile, the possibility exists for Christians to start to forget their Jewish roots and then read passages bashing "the Jews" and apply it to their own prejudices, hence directing (in the most extreme examples) violence against "Jews" living in their midst.

A similar thing can be seen with the Muslim community (starting with Muhammad) and the anti-Jew attitudes that persist in the world today (contributed to by other factors of course, and notice I didn't say "anti-Semite" because Arabs, who are predominately Muslim, are technically Semites as well).

I can agree with Carroll on that point however much I might disagree with some of his others. So I think the movie was a nice balance to the book. Just because you're a Christian of the non-Catholic variety, you aren't "off the hook" when it comes to being accountable when it comes to anti-semitism.

So if your hope was to watch this and have your "Catholicism is evil... EEEEVIIIILLL!" bigotry stroked, I'm happy you were disappointed. There were a few factual inaccuracies in the film (mostly related to his statements about Ratzinger's actions as Pope Benedict XVI), but I found it surprisingly even-handed (again, as a counter-balance to the earlier text), despite his obvious personal bias (no documentary is "unbiased").

http://www.historyversusthedavincicode.com/
History vs. the Da Vinci Code

reply

insightful post.

please elaborate on the inaccuracies re Ratzinger. He presided over the concordat, so i'm inclined to see him as a bit of a villain.

its true that contending with the nazis would have been VERY inconvenient, but then - so was contending with those early Roman Emperors.

imo, the greatest act of moral cowardice in the history of the church - tried to inform my desperately r.c. family about this, but they didnt want to hear the bad news.

nice doc that puts the german r.c. perspective circa '33:

the cross and the star (avail. for instant viewing on netflix)

reply

This article pretty much covers it (among other things):

http://www.firstthings.com/article/2008/06/james-carrolls-unholy-crusa de-a-critique-of-the-film-iconstantines-swordi-17



http://www.historyversusthedavincicode.com/
History vs. the Da Vinci Code

reply

[deleted]

After having studied the history of the early Christian church (which for a couple of centuries was understood as a *Jewish movement*) for more than 6 years and after having read the overly long rant to which this comment is a reply, I only have to say that the historical understanding of smidthestampede is fragmentary, short-sited, and quite clearly distorted by personal opinions and/or beliefs. I don't believe that this comment to be lucid or helpful in judging the quality of this film. I am also doubtful that these comments help foster discussion of the topics raised in "Constantine's Sword".

reply

Yeah blame the Jews, every two bit brainless loser's scapegoat.

reply

As of now, it seems to be subject to more of an uprating campaign if nothing else. 1/3 of the ratings are 10. Currently the mean rating is 7.2 with a median of 8. The overall rating is 6.8. Thankfully IMDB uses methods of statistical control. Regardless, IMDB ratings can't be trusted and shouldn't be brought up every time a film fails to correspond to a specific viewer's sensibilities. For nearly all films, the rating distribution will have a suspicious amount of 1s and 10s. I suppose we of the internet generation either REALLY like or REALLY dislike everything we watch.

reply

I liked this film, however, I felt it didn't present something I already didn't know (expect one thing); yes the state and religion is reaching a dangerous / harmonious relationship in the U.S. Yes, Christianity has done a lot of bad things over the years, and yes, evangelicals are crazy people (the first shot of the reverend actually scared me to death, he is the manifestation of the stereotypical image I have of evangelicals) - what I did not know, was that the church and the pope stood idly by as thousands of Jews were deported outside the gates of the Vatican. The image of Mussolini / Hitler shaking hands with the pope seemed fabricated (though I know it wasn't), that's how hard it was for me to believe this. I am not a Christian (I have a lot of issues with Christianity) but I'm saying that the film only points out things that would be new to Americans and that Europeans have known since the aftermath of 9/11. Seeing how so many crazy Christians are in power over there, I doubt this film will get any wide mention at all, something which is clearly reflected in the ratings here on IMDB. In the end, it was just confirming what I already knew, while being beautifully shot for a documentary.

My score: 8/10

-n0c-

reply

very well said

reply

Crazy Christians in charge over here? Europeans know the deal but Americans don't, that is why this movie won't be viewed over here (US). Wow, you people really are stupid.

Think you people need to get a life. If the "Crazy Christians" were really in charge, I think that things would be more like when FDR (a socialist Democrat)was in charge during WWII. He rounded up the Japanese and put them in camps "just in case". And that included the ones BORN IN AMERICA. Somehow I work with Muslims and see them daily, how can they be walking free with the Crazy Christians in charge? Believe me, if the Crazy Christians were really in charge, Iraq -Iran - Syria - Saudi wouldn't be a problem, they would be glass. We can extract oil from under fused sand without any real problem, and there wouldn't be any Muslims left to pay for the oil.

Then the Hilter and the pope thing. HILTER KILLED CATHOLICS TOO! If you are from Europe how can you not know this? The same number of Polish Catholics were killed as JEWS! Hilter was killing Evangelicals TOO! He wasn't a Christain. He had Balkan MUSLIMS in the SS! Check your history.

The Baath party was modeled on the National Socialist - AKA Nazi Party.

Maybe you Europeans need to study history instead of propaganda from the left. Hitler was a National SOCIALIST. Just like you guys posting on here.

reply

Wow, gringott is quite agitated...yes, our biggest threat here in America...socialism. Especially those socialists on Wall Street... Gotta go now; unlike gringott, I can't devote all this time to exposing FDR's socialism...I HAVE a life! Love&Peace to all the faiths.

reply

What a weird response.

reply

Agree with you gringott! Hitler didn`t like christianity and wanted to destroy it after he was finnish with the jews! Hitler wanted absolute power but christianity was in his way! He hated christian people and jews! Hitler`s right hand Himmler was an hedonist and hated christianity too! I am from Norway and without christianity the world would have been a much more dangerous place!

reply

Man, what is it about us WASPS that make us have to enslave or kill everyone else?

Anyhow, evangelical Christians and radical Muslims are the same. Forcing their beliefs on everyone around them and, when those people won't comply, snuffing them as best as is currently possible in our politically correct society.

They say:

Gay people are people we should love, but let's deny them as much as possible starting with marriage and adopting children.

The government should give our tax money to religious groups that the GOVERNMENT deems worthy (ahem Christians). A blatant violation of church establishment!

Women raped by their brothers should be forced to carry the child inside of them.


Heck I love this documentary. It is so rare to see anyone stand up to those scary Christians. In all honesty, none of the stuff the far-right wants to do will hurt me, but not sticking up for the rights of others would make me no better than a Hitler follower. That's right, the far-right is just a bunch of Nazis. :)

reply

This is an excellent presentation. Only problem I have with the film is that it is a poor substitute for the book. (Yes, I know, the frequent focus on Mr. Carroll's blank expression is a bit much).

I'm sorry, but not surprised, that some of the responders think this is "Jewish Propaganda." If that is because this documentary focused on reality, that's a shame. Too many people live in a dreamworld of myth and hearsay. That is especially evident on the Internet. A focus on reality is good for us all.
___________________________________________

"Outside of a dog, a book is Man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." --G. Marx

reply

One consideration for this question and for James Carroll is that essentially none of the issues addressed in the movie has anything to do with Christianity. The movie focuses on Catholicism and Protestantism, the two main branches of pseudo-Christianity....neo-paganism, and a resurrection of the heresy of the Pharisees, respectively. The occasional reference to Jesus in the movie gives the uninformed viewer the sense that, what J. Carroll refers to in the movie as Christianity is the "real thing" and it is bad.
Mr. Carroll seems to be a very confused man and he does a great disservice to real Christianity. Maybe the "1" ratings come from Christians....though I can see why the Catholics and Protestants wouldn't be too thrilled about it either.
A "must see" for Sunday service!

reply

My church believes that God is an intelligent gas issuing forth from the heads of the truly anointed. Pat Buchanan would be welcome.

What is the sound an imploding pimp makes?

reply

The way I understand it, Christianity is described as a religion that believes in the teachings of Jesus Christ. They believe he was the messiah and sent by God. This would include Catholics, Protestants, and Evangelicals.

So I do not understand how you can say that this has nothing to do with Christianity.

I think the biggest fault he finds with it is their role in the violence that has been perpetrated in the name of Christianity and Christianity's subsequent denials/ignorance/apathy/ambivalence of the part they play.


=========

"I will take no calls on the matter. I am busy."

reply

He says this has nothing to do with Christianity because he wants to believe in the divinity of Christ without being forced to reckon with the historical crimes of those who believed in the divinity of Christ. It's knucklehead, head in the sand ideology. Nothing more.

Nothing left except Clorox bottles and plastic fly swatters with red dots on them!

reply