MovieChat Forums > La fille coupée en deux (2007) Discussion > Why does Charles dump Gabrielle??

Why does Charles dump Gabrielle??


I saw this at the Toronto Film Festival in Sept. 2007, and both my wife and I loved it.

But we had one major problem: When Charles takes Gabrille to his club, she cooperates...then the next morning he drops her and she sinks into depression, finally turning to the playboy suitor, Paul. So why does Charles drop her? Earlier he tells her she might be the last one to share his little love nest, and she tells him how much she loves him. So what's the problem? Maybe I'm fantacizing about Ludivine and the likelihood of my dropping her like that (0%). My son came up with a theory: Charles was testing her, and she failed. If so, what a double standard!!! But that does fit all the innocent angel imagery and names (Gabrielle "Snow"), although it doesn't seem to me she was that innocent to start with. But maybe that's all relative. Maybe you have to be French to understand.

Any ideas?

reply

I think he's just assuming he's gonna cheat on her.

Let's see. When Charles tells Gabrielle that he's going to London, he sais that he's coming back on thursday or friday. but when we later see him with his wife at the train station about to catch the Eurostar train to London, he sais to his wife that his gonna be in London for a month or so, and then he talks about moving to New York depending on someone that we don't know. My guess, is that this is a consequence of what we early saw in the movie, when he talks about writting a biography, and wants his manager to get him a travel round the world. So, I guess he manage to get that trip, or the book, or both, and that's why he leaves.

But maybe the final reason for him to leave is that he's also "coupé en deux", between his wife and Gabrielle, and he doesn't want to chose.

Chabrol always works a lot with time, not making easy time transitions. But the key to this I guess is the conversation in Lisbon the first time Gabrielle and Paul go there, when he sais that it's almost a year since he run into her at the book store, So, we have to assume that several months have passed between Charles' departure and their trip, And, since we have no notice of Charles until they are engaged, when he's in the tub, that make sense, I guess.

Hope it helped.

reply

I just saw this movie and I have my own idea as to why Charles dumped Gabrielle. The obvious one is it's a typical male pig thing to do, LOL. But perhaps he wasn't a typical male and actually felt for Gabrielle. I disagree with your son's theory. I think Gabrielle passed the test. We know she did what he asked and slept with his friends while Charles watched. I think he then realized how much Gabrielle loved him and the lengths she was willing to go for him. He knew in good conscience that he was never leaving his wife and it was not fair to string such a young woman along. So he said his goodbyes and left her. Had she not jumped into marriage with a man she didn't love, Charles' move would have been the right thing to do and the best thing for Gabrielle in the long run.

reply

Thanks--makes sense, but you have to have a lot of confidence in Charles!

reply

You might want to check out my post on another thread on this board here : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0901485/board/thread/117875104?d=119145912&p=1#119145912

reply

Shows my naivite. But I think you've got it. If you look at it that way, it all makes sense! Thanks!

reply

I am going to go out on a limb and explain my view, because I feel like you are missing a big part of the picture.

I disagree with several of the theories illustrated here because I don't believe there is a BDSM undertone, nor do I believe that Chabrol painted a picture with very conventional reasoning.

A lot of the themes in this film suggest loss of innocence, and mainly though sexual encounter. Chabrol took you through a journey with Snow White/Red Riding Hood reaching adulthood. What awaits is non-conventional sex, heartbreake, the surprises of life, and of course death.

Gabrielle Deneige (or however you spell the name) is a play on the french word for Snow (like Snow White), and her first name is that of an Angel's. Even her lovers refer to her as an angel. The men at the "club" refer to her as an Angel. Capucine is even sympathetic to Gabrielle's naivete, as you can see in the end (or in the way she talks to Charles about Gabrielle).

So what do we have? A man who loves innocence. In my theory, this is why Charles breaks up with Gabrielle, because she has no more innocence after her encounters at the club. So in pointing to what someone earlier had said, "No she did not pass the test." (If there was a test) It is in good reason that Charles is just a playboy. There is no test, because this is what he does on a usual basis; picks a young girl up, defiles her, then defiles her even more with his buddies, because that's how he gets off. Hell, even his wife is used to changing the locks on the door, without question.

Why would someone do this; only creeps do this? No, this guy is impotent unless he does filthy acts of sex and humiliation. He loves his wife, but his wife will not do those things for him. Conventional sex will not get him off. He is a voyeur and I guess a sadist (though not BDSM). Yes, this man loves to deprave women of their innocence, because he believes it is beautiful. Why are some men attracted to virgins?

Why doesn't Charles leave his wife then? Because good sir...she's a "a Saint" as Charles often says about her. His wife is the embodiment of a perfect Saint for him. He would never leaver her, nor defile her like he did Gabrielle.

Lastly, why then did Charles try to go after Gabrielle AGAIN? Because Charles is a douche, and only thinks about "his property." It is typical male egoism that sets him off, and he does not want his enemy to take his property. Shallow isn't it?

No, this is not the love story that people want. That is because there is no love, but only fool's love. Love of the naive, and love of the jaded.

Sorry if this was convoluted. I wrote this late, but I wanted to explain it.

reply

I agree with everything you say except for the encounter between Capucine and Gabrielle before the trial. Whether Capucine likes her or not, the purpose of the meeting was for Capucine to dissuade Gabrielle from testifying against Charles. Why? Because Charles' books were her meal ticket and although sales probably increased after the shooting, they were sure to wither away to zero when people found out what a perve he was.

I think that Gabrielle was so put off by this phoney pretense of friendship and caring that it was the deciding factor in her decision to testify against Charles.

reply

Actually people in France couldn't care less about that. If he wrote well, that's all that counts. And he's not such a perv, come on. Loosen up.


Listen to the silence at night




reply

. . . they were sure to wither away to zero when people found out what a perv he was.
I suggest the opposite would be the case. And not just in France

reply

<Spoilers>

He dumped her because she was giving him too much of herself, she opened up too much for him, and a woman should never do that. Poor Gabrielle makes this mistake twice in the movie (later she opens up to Paul with fatal consequences). She is very naive, and that's why her last name is DeNeige (not because she is that innocent, but because she is naive, i. e. pure.) Her mystique was lost in Charles's eyes after she underwent the final test in the sex club. When he learns about her getting married he attempts to get her back, and that's typical too - now that she is someone else's property, she is attractive again. The man-woman relationships in this film are very conventional, just taken to an extreme, and that's what makes it a good movie.

reply

No wonder his wife seemed to handle it all. I wonder what was in it for her, though. Call me naive but I hope she had someone, too.

"Two more swords and I'll be Queen of the Monkey People." Roseanne

reply

..........because he's a d-bag? He got what he wanted out of her and didn't want her to get anymore attached beyond that because he was still committed to his marriage...in the sense of, keeping it. All his "I never loved anyone as much as you" and blah blah was just BS I think.

reply

[deleted]