Why?


Yeah, the first did pretty good for a horror at the BO, but the reviews were horrible. I seriously doubt many people will see this because of how bad the first was. It's most likely going to flop bad.

reply

Well, it grossed over 40 million and had a budget of about 20 million so it made a decent amount of money. But yes, the review were aful for this movie but i didn't think the first one was all that bad.

Ramones, the best band ever.

reply

Okay when i saw that this movie was being made the first thing I said to myself was WHY????? The first one was so bad. It has one of the worst plots ever. Yes the idea was cool but they don't explain enough and it just spirals farther and farther away from any good idea there ever was! But seriously I have noticed the worse a movie is the faster they are to make a sequel for it! Help!! We are going to die from bad movies and their sequels!

reply

I'm pissed off at too many bad sequels. Hell, I'm pissed off at too many bad movies to begin with. Ghost House is the worst production company ever. Why's Tobin doing this? I'll maybe see it because I'm a huge fan of his work, but I GUARANTEE this will get bad reviews.



I can't wait for:

-Dead Silence
-Behind The Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon
-Rogue

reply