I thought the remake of the 1st was so DAMN AWFUL! I shut it off 30 some minutes in because it was soo lame. Why the hell would a sequel be considered for this crap?
http://www.shompy.com/orlandoeastwood/l41721_ukuk.html
what do you mean remake? there was never a remake. the first one (the one that this film follows) was a stand alone film, not a remake or anything. so what are you talking about?
AT LAST MY ARM IS COMPLETE AGAIN!
OFFICIAL BLEEDER
[deleted]
If you only watched it for 30 minutes you realize your opinion is absolutely without merit, right?
share[deleted]
I watched a screener of the entire thing and I concur and support his review -DAMN AWFUL.
There is nothing scary about this movie and ......
SPOILER ALERT!!!!!
SPOILERS BELOW!!!!
LEAVE NOW IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW!!!!
In the end, it is revealed that there is nothing supernatural going on in this movie at all. It's a total gyp. They tried to take a supernatural story (weak as the original was) and cash in on the whole torture genre, so what we have here is a REALLY LAME attempt to be like SAW and not just by casting the actor. The killer turns out to be very human member of the cast and no it's not Tobin Bell - that would probably cause legal action.
[deleted]
will send a pvt response to you
shareIt did hint that in the Title. The tag line is "Fear in the flesh"
share