...or they got them removed digitally (or had some *beep* on them).
Why this stupid "no nipple" policy ? The movie/plot gives the perfect opportunity for showing nudity...and you see everything except the good parts are blurred/covered (Amanda Aardsma & Christa Campbell)...this looks so stupid.
We want nipples for the win !
Maybe because not everyone wants to be on screen naked especially when its not even necessary. Would you want to show all the viewers your small dick?
shareSo what you're saying is you'd choose not to see Christa Campbell naked? That's just wrong in so many ways, man...
Right. Well, I have to-- I have to go now, Duane, because I, I'm due back on the planet Earth.
Do you have comprehension problems? I said i support someones right to not have to be naked on screen if they dont want to. I repeat, would you want viewers looking at your tiny dick?
shareI'm kinda proud of my tiny dick, numbnuts. You still haven't explained why you don't want to see Christa naked, Mary...
Right. Well, I have to-- I have to go now, Duane, because I, I'm due back on the planet Earth.
When did i ever say i didnt? All i said was i dont care whether theres nudity or not in a movie
sharewould you want viewers looking at your tiny dickDepends if it was hot babes, or tired old queens. share
Hahaha
sharecrnagora deserved that, mv5!
shareoh man, this is why you gotta love Lionsgate.
shareexactly, that was like THE MOST ANNOYING THING I HAVE EXPERIENCED WHILE WATCHING A MOVIE. i mean, what the f, why were her nipples and aereolas either covered or obscured by something. i've never experienced that while watching a movie, why did they do that? i mean what's the point of showing nudity if it's not nudity, i mean this is worse than having a body double, because it's even less fulfulling than a body double because it's nothing whereas at least a body double is something, it's tits and aereolas.
share