How can you compare this movie to classics like Blade runner ?
First - mood is not right although they had some resemblance of noir atmosphere
Second - the plot is some bulls*** with mixed up science terms, etc.
Third - fight sequences suck - like these guys are so clumsy and have no legs at all, by the way who invented beating wing chun wooden dummy and then a tied man is simply stupid
As a whole not more than 4 I think
1st - go off at the poeple that compared this to Bladerunner. It isn't the film's fault. And it's perfectly fine for the film to be lesser than a classic.
2nd - the plot isn't some 'bull****'. Using such terminology is just an excuse for you to not need a properly constructed critque.
3rd - they were pretty good. Is there some rule that they had to use their feet? Just because the actor was trained in Wing Chun doesn't mean that the characters in the film were doing Win Chun. The fights were no clumsier than any other movie fights where the actors are largely untrained (well, one of them anyway). As for the dummy? The guy was a show off. The retards that he was entertaining clearly enjoyed the build up. Theatrics my friend.
And it's perfectly fine for the film to be lesser than a classic.Absolutely! No it's not Bladerunner, but a perfectly reasonable French sci-fi actioner produced cleverly on a modest budget.
This was a decent piece of crap as the op said. Mostly I disliked the main role actor who was a douche bag. I really wanted the bad guys to kill that zero charisma a-hole. But oh well, I've seen worse sci-fi/crime bs.
share