FEMA's reports of high temperature eutectic corrosion and the sulfidation of steel members of either tower 1 or 2 and definitely 7. Intragranular melting doesnt mean it is kryptonite bunkers.
ps: dont try to explain here what the Government wont touch with a ten foot pole.
sulfidation of steel members
Drywall and water = Sulfur.
Tinfoil_Hat_Man - Why....oh why you morons defer to 'experts' is anyone's guess.
Hey tinfoil, you think seawater and drywall can cause a high temperature eutectic reaction that corrodes, melts, and evaporates structural steel?
think again
then think some more
melts, and evaporates structural steel
Prove it melted.
Tinfoil_Hat_Man - Why....oh why you morons defer to 'experts' is anyone's guess.
Here is Appendix C of the WTC Fema report. The very first page SHOWS you a picture of structural steel...corroded by a eutectic reaction that resulted in intragranular melting and evaporation. Appendix C is NOT about just the steel you see on page 1. It's about a whole phenomenon which attacked ALL 3 BUILDINGS. (Aluminum? hahaha) By the way, the steel you see in that photo is reportedly missing if my memory serves me right. Seems like you bunkers hated the truth so much, you went commando and stole/destroyed Government evidence:
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
Wonderful, Read C6, It's self debunking, temperatures of 700 to 1000c check. Those temperatures were present.
(Aluminum? hahaha)
That's your attempt at debunking, Why would I expect more.
Seems like you bunkers hated the truth so much, you went commando and stole/destroyed Government evidence:
Wrong little boy. It was inspected.
Tinfoil_Hat_Man - Why....oh why you morons defer to 'experts' is anyone's guess.
Ummm, C6 doesnt mention any temperatures whatsoever! It only says that the source of the sulfur remains a mystery and may in fact have contributed to the weakening of the buildings (ie: caused their collapse).
little boy? What world do YOU live in?
Read the other parts of the report sonny boy, the temperatures reached that point. Rookie!
Tinfoil_Hat_Man - Why....oh why you morons defer to 'experts' is anyone's guess.
Fine, but again, my little novice, can kerosine open air fuel fires reach those temperatures?
What's in question is an open air carbon based flame, not a blast furnace. The fuel was all burned off in about 10 minutes after the crashes. The part of the report where the 700 Celsius temperatures are mentioned (1000 C not mentioned) is also mentioning the mysterious sulfidation, my little likudnik.
Fine, but again, my little novice, can kerosine open air fuel fires reach those temperatures?
What's in question is an open air carbon based flame, not a blast furnace. The fuel was all burned off in about 10 minutes after the crashes
What a rookie, The NIST mentions this, two pictures.
Theory
http://www.debunking911.com/sagt.jpg
FACT
http://www.debunking911.com/sag.ht1.jpg
With the fire proofing blown off, the fire only needed as little as 600 degrees C to deform the naked truss steel.
The jet fuel only acted like lighter fluid setting office coverings and fixtures on fire, mostly poly products like carpeting.
The fact you think jet fuel brought the buildings down shows how much you know about the offical claims and 9/11 in general.
Trubl_Makr - Attention CBS: Bring back Walker, Texas Ranger! WTR is my favourite show
That looks real good, except the NIST models couldnt produce the deformations you are talking about. And they used real fire and real steel.
sorry, I just don't buy it.
Try the house up the street.
That looks real good, except the NIST models couldnt produce the deformations you are talking about. And they used real fire and real steel.
That's because it was there before 9/11 from building sway, NIST did not try to reproduce it, they did not need to, the fireproofing is missing before 9/11 FACT!
Trubl_Makr - Attention CBS: Bring back Walker, Texas Ranger! WTR is my favourite show
cool, i love to copy and paste and call it proof too, here i go...
oh wait i can't find the 911 commission report, or nists, or fema's
Oh i know, let's spin the clock back to the dark ages.
1 First God made heaven & earth 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters. 3 And God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day. 6 And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters." 7 And God made the firmament and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament. And it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day. 9 And God said, "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas......
That's the closet thing they had to the commission report.
That should debunk all you evolutioners....oh wait truthers.
I admit i haven't seen anything except these truther movies, but i am about to start looking into the official story..
Does anyway have any suggestions on what kind of lubrication i should have handy, just in case the official story wants to rape my intelligence.
The only thing i firmly believe out of all this truth BS, and the official BS is the coefficient of resistance of air, and the resistance of steal and concrete are not equal. Otherwise, i want all that money back from those physics courses i took in college. Those numbers are way different, it's like the time it took the government to "clean up" ground zero, and the time it's taking them to clean up new Orleans. They should take all the money they got from the scrape steal that was shipped over seas, and recycled..OK now I'm spitting out facts i heard from the movie...i have to make sure it's real first...sorry..
Ok, i'm just saying there is no way that you can watch these movies, and not go hmmmmmmm.
"I a m not a good American, because i like to form my own opinions."
"First rule(rules i live by), I don't believe anything the government tells me.." George Carlin-Jammin in NY 1992
So ur saying that making you believe that Tower 7 fell because of fire and damage isnt insulting your intelligence?
the point still remains igmo, I proved the melting and evaporation of structural steel. THEREFORE, the firefighter and contractor tales of pools of metallic lava are not just baseless hearsay.
share