9/11 trump card


After reviewing some of the well thought, half thought, and even piss poor excuses for supporting the OCT on this forum, I thought i'd throw out the trump card:

NIST admitted that WTC7 fell at free fall speed for 2.25s during stage2 of the collapse as they measured it:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html

That time calculates to 6-20 stories of freefall collapse (ViT + 1/2A*T^2; 13'/story), depending on the initial velocity of stage2 which NIST does not quantify.

It is physically impossible for a steel framed building to free fall without controlled demolitions (CDs) ... even for 2.25s ... even if the steel was melting. It must take some finite time for the support columns to fail ... unless of course they are removed by CDs ... which is the way it is successfully done quite routinely.

There WERE CDs in the 3 WTCs and it had to require inside help to plant them. Hence, 9/11 WAS an inside job.

reply

[deleted]

Guess again...

reply

Guess again...

Sorry Zagorin. Pretty much every structural and civil engineer in the world disagree with you.


No way the girl in the pics is her since I slam girls like that on the weekends-Jerome66

reply

Have you spoken to all of em?

Dont be ridiculous.

reply

Have you spoken to all of em?

Have you?

Links to engineering papers and other info on WTC 7:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/wtc7engineeringpapers%2Ccollapsehypoth eses

The ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) report on the Pentagon:
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

From the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on the WTC (directly refutes CTs):
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/Bazant_WTC_Collapse_What_Did__Did_No.p df

As you know, I have a lot more. These are just some engineering papers on the attacks.

If there's an civil or structural engineer who has a differing opinion and has published a paper in a peer-reviewed engineering journal, please link it to me.

Dont be ridiculous.

Please. You're Captain Ridiculous!


No way the girl in the pics is her since I slam girls like that on the weekends-Jerome66

reply

Some background snippets and useful links:

[...]

Sofia Shafquat

Sofia Shafquat (http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=50342) AKA Sofia (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNfiikXm4SU), director of the 9/11 Mysteries (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=9%2 F11+Mysteries&hl=en) video. She created and narrated the film 9-11 Mysteries Part 1: Demolitions with Brad Waddell. The film was based on a play that she and Brad performed in Los Angeles. Brad appears briefly at the beginning of the movie and Sofia appears briefly at the end. The film is controversial because it credits Eric Hufschmid, a Holocaust Denier (http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/Holocaust_Denial), as introducing "Brad" to 9/11 Denial. In addition, Rick Siegel (http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/9/11_Conspiracy_Theorists#Richard_Sie gel), maker of 9-11 Eyewitness, is taking legal action against Sofia for using his footage in what he says is disinformation (http://www.ricksiegel.com/web2/node/17 + http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuit.asp?id=46083). Her website is here: http://www.911weknow.com. [...]

9/11 Mysteries is refuted here: Screw 9/11 Mysteries – Clunkity Clunk Edition (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=72810)

source:
http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/9/11_Conspiracy_Theorists#Sofia_Shafq uat • accessed on the 2010-09-13

Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to (P. Green)

reply