Clunkity Clunk!


Sofia Shafquat the "brains" behind 9/11 Mysteries...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1661234396051243299

...that's right folks if you can't vocalize a description of the event it's got to be hoax!

reply

I love that one, solid science there.

El Frank Bomb-cause you're too dum to do it yourself.

reply

Yeah no doubt.

After watching this video of a gattling gun test...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twKl3bs8tP0

...I found out that "apparently" such guns fire at a rate of about 6,000 rounds per minute, I decided to use a hypothetical demonstation to prove this is BS. Each round going off is signified by the word "BANG", so I then got a senior member of the "Bohemian Grove" to say the word 6,000 times and time it with his stop watch, it took him almost 1 hour!

This is sick when will the NWO stop lying about things such as this, do they think we are stupid?

reply

Yea, The NWO tricked me into thinking a playing card in my bike spokes worked when I was a kid, they are a crafty bunch.


Did you see her on the History Channel special?

El Frank Bomb-cause you're too dum to do it yourself.

reply

Yeah, I watched it a couple of days after it was first aired, good stuff.

I must admit she doesn't come across as the sharpest tool on the block (so to speak), and she's certainly no expert on controlled demolition or building collapses.

That clip of her talking about the hypothetical demonstration "Clunkity Clunk" I posted on the op of mine is from the same documentary. ;)

reply

Clunkity........................

Free The Chasers!

reply

so what?
that just helps many people understand that 9/11 was a scientific and historical proven inside job and conspiracy.

9/11 was an inside-job = an undenyable historical FACT!!

reply

so what?
that just helps many people understand that 9/11 was a scientific and historical proven inside job and conspiracy.


If you call that science you are so clueless.

alfa3647 -Oh I can read englsh.

reply

I have read much science on the internet and seen documentaries about 9/11. I know all about Science.

9/11 was an inside-job = an undenyable historical FACT!!

reply

I have read much science on the internet and seen documentaries about 9/11. I know all about Science.

OK, Lets start at the beginning, which way does gravity work, up or down, you have a 50-50 shot.

alfa3647 -Oh I can read englsh.

reply

I have read much science on the internet and seen documentaries about 9/11. I know all about Science.
Very good!

Now take your "Clunkity Clunk" evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, write a scientific paper about it and see if you can get it published in a journal for peer review such as Nature, Science, PNAS, or Physical Review Letters. What are you waiting for? It's been over 6 years and you've figured it all out, you'll be a hero! Man, how dumb are the scientific community and the media for believing 19 Islamic Terrorists hijacked several planes and flew them into landmark buildings on US soil.

reply

you people are not looking at the greater picture, that is 9/11 being an inside job. Therefore having evidence is irrelevant, what is important is the truth - that you have faith in that!
History will proove us right!

9/11 was an inside-job = an undenyable historical FACT!!

reply

hi steffen,

Are you really a twoofah?

reply

Yea, He fits right in.

alfa3647 -Oh I can read englsh.

reply

I think I just found my new wack-o signature line:

steffenebbesen1984 - you people are not looking at the greater picture, that is 9/11 being an inside job. Therefore having evidence is irrelevant, what is important is the truth - that you have faith in that!
History will proove us right!



Evidence is irrelevant? Wha... wha... what!?!

Correction to your statement, steffenebbesen1984: "Faith-based" ANYTHING is irrelevant.


Why do you people dishonor the memories of 2,998 people with your incoherent blathering about conspiracies and secret societies? It is completely unproductive.

Master, I beg you to make these idiots disappear! Ugh!










Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.

reply

Master, I beg you to make these idiots disappear! Ugh!

I try my best but most are in their own little world like the ones you point out. About all I can do is cut their nonsense off at the knees with facts.

Trubl_Makr writes - Attention CBS: Bring back Walker, Texas Ranger! WTR is my favourite show

reply

W T C 7

'Nuff said eggheads.

My signature is lazy

reply

W T C 7

'Nuff said eggheads.


Not quite 'Nuff.

------------------

WTC7 came down with a 20 story hole in it, a three story visible bulge and totally on fire and corner damage running up to the 18th floor but let’s explore shall we?

WTC7 hit by a huge chunk of the North Tower.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI

Let’s look at these videos of WTC 7 first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U

Stills of the whole building.

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_smoke_1.html

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_smoke_2.html

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_smoke_3.html

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_smoke_4.html

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_smoke_5.html

Corner damage.
http://www.kolumbus.fi/av.caesar/wtc/wtc7_2.jpg

The 20 Story Hole
http://www.debunking911.com/7wtc.jpg

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6186921835292416413&hl=en- CA

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3088/wtc7band300000fh6.jpg

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/310/wtc7band400000ac0.jpg

Illustrated 42 page PowerPoint style detailed report (easy read) on the damage. A must see.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20F inal.pdf

Here is your fire from the firemen on scene.

Battalion Chief John Norman
Special Operations Command - 22 years

From there, we looked out at 7 World Trade Center again. You could see smoke, but no visible fire, and some damage to the south face. You couldn’t really see from where we were on the west face of the building, but at the edge of the south face you could see that it was very heavily damaged.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
Chris Boyle expands on what he saw when he viewed the south side, not just the corner.
Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html

Another report talks of damage that suggested collapse was a real possibility:
...Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110462.PDF

Fire chief Daniel Nigro says further assessment of the damage indicated that it was severe:

The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC Building 7]. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?id=1521846767-634

"Then we found out, I guess around 3:00 [o'clock], that they thought 7 was going to collapse. So, of course, [we've] got guys all in this pile over here and the main concern was get everybody out, and I guess it took us over an hour and a half, two hours to get everybody out of there. (Q. Initially when you were there, you had said you heard a few Maydays?) Oh, yes. We had Maydays like crazy.... The heat must have been tremendous. There was so much [expletive] fire there. This whole pile was burning like crazy. Just the heat and the smoke from all the other buildings on fire, you [couldn't] see anything. So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and [that's] when 7 collapsed.... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse, and then we waited a while and it got a lot more organized, I would guess." - Lieutenant William Ryan
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC
/Ryan_William.txt


Another fireman reported damage that progressed as the day wore on.
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?
Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html

[Shortly after the tower collapses] I don‚t know how long this was going
on, but I remember standing there looking over at building 7 and realizing that
a big chunk of the lower floors had been taken out on the Vesey Street side.
I
looked up at the building and I saw smoke in it, but I really didn't see any
fire at that time. Deputy ƒƒChief Nick Visconti http://tinyurl.com/paqux

A few minutes after that a police officer came up to me and told me that
the façade in front of Seven World Trade Center was gone and they thought there
was an imminent collapse of Seven World Trade Center. FDNY Lieutenant William
Melarango
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110045.PDF

I think they said they had seven to ten floors that were freestanding and
they weren't going to send anyone in. FDNY Chief Thomas McCarthy
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110055.PDF

So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn‚t look like
there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there
had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors.
Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. But they had a
hose line operating. Like I said, it was hitting the sidewalk across the
street, but eventually they pulled back too.

Then we received an order from Fellini, we‚re going to make a move on 7. That
was the first time really my stomach tightened up because the building didn‚t
look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There was
no hydrant pressure. I wasn‚t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer
I‚m standing next to said, that building doesn‚t look straight. So I‚m standing
there. I‚m looking at the building. It didn‚t look right, but, well, we‚ll go
in, we‚ll see.

So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed to-
ward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandeis
came running up. He said forget it, nobody‚s going into 7, there’s creaking,
there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10
minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another
report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Vis-
conti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was aban-
doned.

Firehouse Magazine: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to
the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered through there. It was a huge
hole. I would say it was probably a third of it, right in the middle of it. And
so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we‚ll
head back to the command post.„ Capt. Chris Boyle http://tinyurl.com/e7bzp


After the initial blast, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings, 46, re-
ported to a command center on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center. He was
with Michael Hess, the city's corporation counsel, when they felt and heard an-
other explosion. First calling for help, they scrambled downstairs to the
lobby, or what was left of it. "I looked around, the lobby was gone. It looked
like hell," Jennings said.

http://www.record-eagle.com/2001/sep/11scene.htm

Anyway, I was looking at WTC7 and I noticed that it wasn’t looking like it
was straight. It was really weird. The closest corner to me (the SE corner) was
kind of out of whack with the SW corner. It was impossible to tell whether that
corner (the SW) was leaning over more or even if it was leaning the other way.
With all of the smoke and the debris pile, I couldn’t exactly tell what was going
on, but I sure could see the building was leaning over in a way it certainly
should not be. I asked another guy looking with me and he said “That
building is going to come down, we better get out of here.” So we did. –M.J.,
Employed at 45 Broadway.

So we left 7 World Trade Center, back down to the street, where I ran into
Chief Coloe from the 1st Division, Captain Varriale, Engine 24, and Captain
Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged
on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said
we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which
we did. – FDNY Lieutenant Rudolph Weindler
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110462.PDF


And a lot of Fuel

Fuel Tanks for generators in WTC7

275-gallon tank on 7th floor;

one 6,000-gallon tank located between low-rise elevators in east elevator shaft between 2nd and 3rd floors

Two 6,000-gallon tanks under loading dock on ground level

Two 12,000-gallon tanks under loading dock on ground level

275-gallon tank on 5th floor

Approximately 50- to 100-gallon tank under generator on 9th floor

275-gallon tank on 8th floor on west side next to exterior wall

AND HERE ARE TWO QUESTIONS

1. If this was done as a False Flag Operation, what is the significance of the relatively small in the (grand scheme of things) WTC7, If you drop the Huge WTC1 & 2 (think back to those images on TV the first time you saw them) did Bush have some mathematical formula that said the US population would not support a war in Iraq unless WTC7 was dropped also?

2. Why drop the penthouse through WTC7’s roof 5 seconds before you drop WTC7. If you are going to bring the whole thing down in five seconds why do all the work to drop the penthouse through the roof a mere five seconds earlier?


Andromeda KKKs – The Eva Braun for a New Millennium!

reply

Clear incontrovertible proof that there's no such thing as working AK-47: you try saying "rat-tat-tat-tat-tat" 600 times in one minute.

Feeling Shifty?
http://www.fenrisdesigns.com

reply

Guys, guys, guys! Chill a bit and listen.

Building 7. No matter how big the hole was and what fire was damaging it.
It wouldnt collapse like that in a million years if there was no controlled
demolition used.

True or false?

reply

False!

Andromeda_XO-Hates Jews and Gays, Loves fans of the kinder!

reply

Enuff said.

.

reply

False


As a disciple of science, I don't believe a plane can fly into a building. - McMike1

reply

False

----
Movie News, Reviews, etc:
http://www.nukethefridge.com/

reply

A Million years is a long time!

Building 7 = Controlled Demolition.

reply

Building 7 = Controlled Demolition.

Wrong, Dave88. Building 7 = Hit by the falling Tower 1.

reply

[deleted]

They showed two guys in building 7 after one and two had collapsed...one guy wondered what the damage was and the second guy said, two small fires. Two small fires would not have caused the building to collapse. It wasn't as if they could blame it on jet fuel which caused an unreasonably hot fire which may or may not have caused the building to collapse.

reply