Can anyone who rated this movie above a 3 explain why?
I see some 10s and 9s, and I can't help but laugh. Those were clearly people who either worked on the flm, or are close to someone who worked on the film. I don't mean to be too negative, but come on. This was not a good movie. At all.
The acting and the script were just atrocious. This is a direct to cable/video caliber movie. This was a major step backwards for everyone involved, because they've all done better work than this.
Can anyone who rated this movie above a 4 tell us why they did it? I mean seriously, I'd love to know what I missed. I don't think anyone involved with this film will be using any parts of this movie on their reel any time soon.