Pretentiousness alarm.
I'm a very jaded movie watcher...
I've probably seen too many movies, and I've got some pet-peeves that most casual movie watchers won't have developed.
One such issue I frequently take with movies is when they're pretentious. When it seems that the director is going for an award over the box office. When it seems the movie is made for the critics and film festivals rather than for the people.
This movie sounded that alarm in 5 minutes, and kept me cringing for the rest of the film.
[SPOILERS]
When the lesbian lover of the daughter of the prostitute moved in with the son of the prostitute's accidental killer... accidentally... I thought that was just stupid.
When she got shot randomly, it seemed like a weak ploy to garner critical acclaim.
And how many times can you use random "room for rent" as a plot device in one movie?. EVERY CHARACTER at some point in the movie lives with every other character.
The dad and the son invited the prostitute to live with them. Then the prostitute's daughter moves in with lotte and her mom.
Then the lotte moves in with the son.
Then Lotte's mom moves in with the son.
Then the prostitute's daughter moves in with the son.
The ONLY combinations of characters who never lived together were:
The dad never lived with the prostitute's daughter. (because he killed himself)
The dad never lived with Lotte's mom. (because he killed himself)
The prostitute never lived with Lotte's mom. (because she was already dead)
And the prostitute's daughter never lived with her own mom, but they presumably had before..
[/END SPOILERS]
This movie was pretentious as all hell, and I couldn't enjoy it...
You've got to be one heck of an amazing film maker to sell such a ridiculous plot. This movie didn't pull it off.
Just one man's opinion.