MovieChat Forums > Katyn (2007) Discussion > Russia Defends Soviet Pact With Nazis 70...

Russia Defends Soviet Pact With Nazis 70 Years Later


Russia Defends Soviet Pact With Nazis 70 Years Later
Friday , August 21, 2009

Associated Press

MOSCOW —

Seventy years ago Sunday, the Soviet Union signed a pact with Nazi Germany that gave dictator Josef Stalin a free hand to take over part of Poland and the Baltic states on the eve of World War II.

Most of the world now condemns the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, but Russia has mounted a new defense of the 1939 treaty as it seeks to restore some of its now-lost sphere of influence.

"This is all being rehabilitated because this is now a very lively issue for Russia," said military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer. "This is not about history at all."

The pact, formally a treaty of nonaggression, was signed Aug. 23, 1939, in Moscow by Vyacheslav Molotov and Joachim von Ribbentrop, the foreign ministers of the two countries.

In addition to the pledge of nonaggression, the treaty included secret protocols that divided eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence.

On Sept. 1, Germany invaded Poland — thus igniting World War II — and within weeks the Red Army had marched in from the east. After claiming its part of Poland, the Soviet Union then annexed part of Finland, the Baltic states and the Romanian region that is now Moldova.

Molotov's grandson and namesake, Vyacheslav Nikonov, said his grandfather saw a deal with Nazi Germany as the only alternative after a failure to reach a military agreement with Britain and France.

The Soviet government was convinced that a Nazi attack on Poland was imminent and "we needed to know where the Germans were going to stop," Nikonov said. The pact also bought needed time for the country to prepare for war, he said.

He said his grandfather later criticized aspects of Stalin's leadership, including the purges, but he stood by the pact for the rest of his life.

"He said there were many, many mistakes done by the Soviet leadership, he regrets many lives," said Nikonov, who was 30 when his grandfather died in 1986 and knew him well. "Molotov never considered Molotov-Ribbentrop as something he would regret."

The Soviet Union officially denied the existence of the secret protocols for decades. They were only formally acknowledged and denounced in 1989.

But as the 70th anniversary of the treaty has approached, some Russian historians have stepped up to vociferously defend the Soviet Union's decision to expand its territory at the expense of its neighbors.

The Foreign Intelligence Service, once part of the KGB, published a book of declassified intelligence reports in an effort to make the case that the nonaggression treaty and its secret protocols were justified and essential to the victory over the Nazis.

Retired Maj. Gen. Lev Sotskov, who compiled the book, said the pact allowed the Soviet Union to "move its borders with Germany" to the West. This prevented the Baltic states of Lithuanian, Latvia and Estonia from becoming a staging ground for an attack, he told journalists.

Even so, when Nazi Germany did attack in June 1941, all the territory the Soviet Union had gained was lost in a matter of weeks.

At the end of the war, however, U.S. and British leaders accepted the borders of the Soviet Union as defined by the treaty with Germany. This in effect restored the borders of the Russian Empire.

The Allied leaders also allowed Stalin to extend the Soviet Union's sphere of influence throughout much of eastern and central Europe.

The current attempt to justify the carving up of Europe during World War II comes as Russia once again is trying to establish its sphere of influence.

After last year's conflict with Georgia, a U.S. ally, President Dmitry Medvedev asserted Russia's right to intervene militarily in what it regards as its zone of "privileged interests" along its borders.

The war stripped Georgia of pieces of its territory, which are now under the control of Russian-backed separatists.

"In his understanding of Realpolitik, Vladimir Putin does not diverge from the line set by Josef Stalin," military analyst Alexander Golts wrote in the online Yezhednevny Zhurnal. "Military force decides everything and if there is an opportunity to grab a piece of someone else's territory then it should be taken."

Moscow has insisted it should have a dominating influence over countries that were once part of the Soviet Union. But Washington has continued to encourage the NATO ambitions of Georgia and Ukraine, and has made clear that it will accept no claims of a Russian sphere of influence over former Soviet republics that are now sovereign states.

Russians' defense of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact also is being used to bolster the Kremlin's push for the creation of a new collective security system to replace NATO, embracing all of Europe, the United States and Canada.

Sotskov said the Soviet Union had to sign the 1939 treaty with Germany because efforts to create "a system of collective security" with Britain, France, Poland and the Baltic states had failed. The Soviet leadership believed the West was hoping to turn Adolf Hitler's armies east against Russia.


reply

I remember reading about Churchill wanting to foster an anti-fascist alliance with the Soviet Union back in the mid-30s, but the ruling Conservatives were hoping that Hitler would attack the Soviet Union. Churchill was critical of Chamberlain's delay and lack of interest. Therefore there is some element of truth to the Russians' arguments cited in this article.

reply

[deleted]

Interesting...that's what the chairman of Poland's Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee asked as well duing a visit by Putin. Putin was there to "ease rifts' with Poland over needless to say a bunch of things. he noted the bravery and heroism of the Polish people but Russia's Foreign Intelligecne service dug in a point surely calculated to get a rise out of Poland. They noted that they have documents showing that Poland cooperated with Nazi Germany before the war to "foment discord" among the Soviet Union's ethnic nationalities. Consequently,
we get this quote from Lev Sotskov of the FIS: "Without a doubt a portion of the blame for the unleashing of the Second World War lies with Poland, which is why they are attemtping to distort historical fact". Anybody know anything about this? The war has been over for many years. First I've heard about this. Is Russia pulling this out a hat? Polish journalists asked if the documents were genuine and asked why the government had waited until Putin's visit to note all that. For those who questioned the documents authenticity, Sotskov said "It's their problem."

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Thanks ahrabows for the link. I also will try to get information. Unfortunately, I do not know Russian. I have to think there might be a translation. If I find anything out I'll post here.

reply

Don't waste your time on russian propaganda!

reply

[deleted]

That's better for you that you can't understand it ;)

reply

er..I think it starts...."Once upon a time".....oh no!... now could that be the genre????.....;-)....

reply

[deleted]

hmmm...interesting..but I noticed that the documents were to refer to problems with "Soviet ethnic nationalities"...that appears to have an "eastern" geo look..and reagrding Munich...I see there's a book out.."Munich 1938"...think i'm going to get it...maybe there's some items relating to this in the book...

reply

Did you expect anything else from a bunch of ignorant mongoloids?!

reply