Doesn't make sense with terrible acting and seriously if you were caught in that position like travis was surely you would get more weapons and shoot them in the church instead of just running thru to escape. And when billy-Ray is trying to hide in the artillery room, why would he scream out to give away his position when he could have crouched down and shot thru the door. Worst movie I have seen in a long time.
shareWow, really??? I thought Billy-ray's reaction was pretty realistic, I'm surprised he managed to survive up until then. I'd have died ages ago, what with being scared sh!tless and all!
And as for Travis, there were kids in the church! You can't kill kids, dude, no matter who they're related to...
~~^^~~
Don't make me drop a house on you.
I agree, this movie was terrible
shareAre you for real. For one they were drugged, they had just seen another bloke get killed and drop down the hatch on to them and your fate is death. Everyone in that church knew what was going on and the kids were taken upstairs away from inside the church. Maybe you should re watch this terrible movie and then rethink what you say. When you are scared so be it however you have to think to survive. You certainly don't give away your position and if you grab a gun in the first place you are thinking of trying to survive. They had a revolver compared to his machine gun. You start shooting the people who were going to kill you to survive. It's animal instinct bud. Maybe should drop the house on yourself after you've given yourself a couple of uppercuts for not watching the movie properly.
shareKnowing nothing about this movie beforehand, I really liked its unpredictable style and narrative. I thought it was going to be some sort of teen horror film with the kids may be coming out on top, but it proved to be something entirely different. Loved the John Goodman and Michael Parks characters. The teens were OK as well, while they were alive.
shareYou don't seem very bright. And unnecessarily angry about this movie.
shareThey had a revolver compared to his machine gun.
You really have to love when people on the internet are sitting around arguing about a genuinely bad film: badly conceived, badly acted, badly made.
Not JUST arguing, but insulting each other, and acting as if they actually have facts to back up the poorly written, bats*** "plot".
writinman2004 who are you to ascertain how bright I am. This is my opinion of this terriblly acted movie with a terrible story line. If you don't like what I write then comment elsewhere you nappy head. The problem with social media is that any 2 bit cork head like yourself can put their 2 cents in which your comment isn't even about the movie. Just your opinion to get a rise out of me. So I'll rise to your terrible comment. If you wanted to reply then reply about the movie not my brightness as my iq is 142 wanker.
share...that's so self explanatory...
sharewritinman2004 who are you to ascertain how bright I am.
A 142 IQ??? You'd be lucky to crack the mid 60's. Your grammar and sentence structure are that of a 10 year-old. "142", Haha, good one, Rambo.
shareI agree. The only reason why this movie is "good" it's because of who's the director and the "mainstream" actors and actresses that appear in it. The script and acting suck.
Ben Affleck hired half his cast for Argo, and Quentin Tarantino ******* love this movie.....So Idk do you like the fast and furious franchise??
shareI liked it.
share[deleted]