Stalker-
I think you need to watch the film again. It's not anti-American in the least. It offers criticism of the operations in Iraq, pointing out some mistakes which have lead to terrible situations like the massacre in Haditha. These criticisms are valid and not unpatriotic. The film is certainly not sympathetic to the terrorists (I doubt bin Laden would approve of the film's laying bare the manipulations and cruelty the insurgents use- remember how the families advised the Sheik of the bomb, only to be told 'leave it to God'? Then surprise surprise it's the Sheik using footage of the resulting massacre to recruit?), nor is it unsympathetic to the American soldiers.
The soldiers, particularly Cpl Ramirez (who gets the most focus of that group), were often depicted sympathetically- as young men thrown into a messy war who struggle to understand and engage with their new environment. Ramirez had several heartbreaking moments- when he talks about feeling unsupported by the marines, how this is his third TD in Iraq and he's only 20, his nightmares and difficulty coping with the horrors of war. We see the soldiers laughing and talking with locals (in the video store), goofing off with each other, going through training (another heartbreaking reminder of their innocence in war, all the naive mistakes they make in the training), then getting psyched up to do their dangerous job (which Ramirez describes as simply 'staying alive until we get back'). Certainly they're unsympathetic in the moment they gun down innocents, but the film carefully lays out their backstories, and continues to follow them after, so that we see both sides.
The terrorists shown in the movie are certainly not shown in sympathetic light. The young man never explains his rationale for joining the insurgency; the film (and the viewer) certainly doesn't side with him. The older man makes a valid point about the disbanding of the Iraqi army having been an insult which spurred him to join the insurgency (it's an acknowledged fact that disbanding the army did cause many ex-soldiers to join the insurgents), however, his character is still never depicted as a man we should root for. He seems broken, a man lost and without purpose, and when he sees what he has actually done he is shattered by the horror and stupidity of it.
The Iraqi civillians naturally garner a lot of sympathy as the poor souls caught in a lose-lose situation. Terrorized by the insurgents (who they refer to as 'terrorists'- not 'fighters' or any sympathetic label) and afraid of the Americans, they just try to lay low and (as one character says) not live their lives ruled by fear because of the terrorists (the insurgents) around them.
'Battle for Haditha' is a film trying to show the complexities of the war in Iraq, and the mistakes that lead to the massacre. You have the marine command so distanced from the fighting that they have no idea it's innocent families, children, being killed, and telling their soldiers to keep up the good work clearing out the insurgency. You have a small group of marines, lead by Cpl Ramirez, so shattered by their experiences that they snap and make a horrible mistake. You have the insurgency manipulating the event to recruit more terrorists, and one of the terrorists (the older man) coming to realise the true nature of his actions & regret what he has done. You have families grieving the deaths of loved ones, soldiers trying to understand and come to terms with what they did & how they were capable of it (the ending, with Ramirez re-imagining the massacre to include his helping out a surviving child, both walking hand in hand into the light, is so beautiful and touching). At the end of the film you're left with a sense of just how lost some of these young soldiers are in the battle, distanced from command, in a hostile country they don't understand, fighting a war that has become impossibly complex. The film is simply recording tragedy, from all possible angles.
reply
share