I'm getting really sick and tired of them changing movie names and making them sequals just to try to make a few more bucks....
I mean why bother changing the movie name to sound like a sequal, if the movie isn't good enough to stand on it's own then there's nothing you can do, adding a new name to sound like a sequal actually makes me NOT want to see it....
It's Into The Blue 2: The Reef.
A lot of sequels have secondary titles.
Mr Vaughn. You wouldn't happen to know an eight letter word for arrogant would you? - Sark
Nah, Alot of movie get a secondary title to become sequals....
IE: Normal Adolesant Behavior...
Name changed to try to make a few bucks...
Havoc 2: Normal Adolesant Behavior....
Not sure if they did the same thing here, just saying I saw a few movie references for a movie called The Reef, not Into The Blue 2: The Reef and when I came here, this was what I found, I think they changed the title for a few measly dollars...
Yeah at first I heard that it was just called 'The Reef'.
But it's always been a sequel to 'Into The Blue' because MGM are doing a bunch of straight to DVD sequels.
Mr Vaughn. You wouldn't happen to know an eight letter word for arrogant would you? - Sark
Yeah figures.... Dude 1: Osht our profits are droping... Dude 2: I got an idea, lets make like 12 sequals to some movies that did semi well and put them out on DVD... should make us a few mil... Dude 1: Sounds like a plan to me lets do it...
I hate that this is what Hollywood is turning into....
Haha that probably just how it went! Executives are idiots!
But like I've said a million times already, I don't mind because David Anders is in it! lol
Mr Vaughn. You wouldn't happen to know an eight letter word for arrogant would you? - Sark
As long as doing it doesn't turn out to be a bad career move for him.
share