Alex jones is a fraud.

I'm sorry, but there is nothing logical about the offical 9/11 story given by the government.

According to the official statement, on 9/11 the fires were so hot from each plane's jet fuel that the steel construction melted and the floors gave-way, giving life to the "pancake theory". This would mean that the fires had to be at or above 1535ºC (2795ºF), which is the melting point of steel. The max temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air [a blue flame]) is nearly half that at approximately 825ºC (1517ºF).

FEMA's own final report on the destruction of the towers stated that, "The heat produced by burning jet fuel does not by itself appear to have been sufficient to initiate the structural collapse."

Battalion Seven Chief, Orio J. Palmer, as recorded on the firefighter radio transmissions that were later confiscated and hushed under orders of National Security, relayed that they had "two isolated pockets of fire" in the South Tower, and they "should be able to knock it down with two lines."
The dark smoke that was billowing from the structures is a tell-tale sign that the fires were suffocating, and not raging like the official account would like us to believe. There are no flames shooting up the sides of the towers, and none pouring out the windows of the floors above. Furthermore, there are pictures of people standing in the gaping hole left allegedly by Flight 11, holding onto the bent exterior columns looking down the side of the building - proving the heat couldn't have been that intense.


"But what about all the jet fuel?"
Remember the enormous fireballs that everyone saw erupt from the buildings as each of the planes hit their respective towers? THAT's the jet fuel.

Fuel, along with other highly flammable materials, evaporates fast and burns even faster. When that type of combustible material is packed into a container, such as a metal fuel tank under high pressure, any spark or incendiary device that comes in contact with the material or fumes will create an explosion. The explosion propels the liquFirebreather demonstrating an excellerant-induced fireball.id outward, thinning out the density of the fuel, which allows it to spread out and burn off large amounts quickly all at once. This is easily demonstrated by "fire-breathers". When they spit the flammable liquid into the flame, they spray it with their mouths. This causes the liquid to burn up in the air creating a huge fireball.

In the PBS/Nova special Why The Towers Fell, Professor Jonathan Barnett from the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, who also appeared in the TLC documentary World Trade Center: Anatomy of the Collapse, states: "The role of the jet fuel...although it was hot, it only lasted a short period of time. It's very similar to using lighter fluid on a charcoal fire. It ignites the charcoal and then burns out."

Even if there were "pools of jet fuel", FEMA's own report states that it wouldn't have gotten hot enough to bring down the Towers.

The "theory" put forth by our governmental officials is that the heat produced by the fire in both towers was so great from the jet fuel that it melted the steel trusses & columns, causing every floor to fall on top of one another. They dubbed this the "pancake" theory.

In the 9/11 Commission Report, they contend that the only support columns were on the outer edge of the towers' construction and that the middle of each building was nothing more than hollowed-out elevator shafts. In reality, there were 47 steel-core columns that ran up the center of each building. The steel used for these columns was some of the thickest, strongest steel to ever be used in construction, and measured over 2-feet in depth. The official theory just doesn't jive when these columns come into the picture.

So why would the Towers collapse completely -- nearly the same as free-fall speed -- without any resistance from the ground floors beneath, while leaving none of the structure standing [except for the small beam assemblies at the base], turning the concrete and office furniture into dust and then shredding the occupants to pieces? We all saw the section of the South Tower above the fires begin to tip over the edge, so why did it disintegrate into the collapse instead of break off and tumble onto the street?

And then there's the eyewitnesses...

Scores of first-hand reports by pedestrians, reporters, firemen and police - most of which were televised the day of September 11th and never aired again - confirm the presence of explosive devices that were planted around the interior of each of the Towers. Reports of the lobbies being blown out from blasts occurring in the sublevels of each of the towers were common among FDNY's first responders.

Phillip Morelli, 37, is a construction worker at the WTC who lived through several blasts that occurred in the sublevels of both buildings, which knocked out entire walls in the basement -kiliing, maiming, and injuring dozens of people. Morelli was on level B4 -- 4 floors below ground -- when he experienced several explosions, both during and after the impacts of the planes.

According to 9/11 hero, William Rodriguez, the last person to leave the North Tower alive, who himself rescued 14 people that day, he was in sublevel one and there was an explosion which shook the building and cracked the walls. Seconds later, his co-worker came running in -- on fire with skin peeling off his arms - yelling "Explosion! Explosion!", and then right as Rodriguez had time to process what was going on, a second explosion rocked the building: The alleged impact of American Airlines Flight 11.

On 9/12/01, Fireman Louie Cacchioli told People Magazine: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building."