MovieChat Forums > Valhalla Rising (2010) Discussion > Have you ever seen a slower movie than t...

Have you ever seen a slower movie than this?


On the top of that i bought the blue-ray of this *beep* Don't think anything could be slower than this.

reply

Béla Tarr's The Man from London and Andrei Tarkovsky's Solyaris are both slower than this. Check 'em out.

reply

Stalker from Tarkovsky is much slower than Solyaris imo. I don't know for fact but while I watched them I almost couldn't finish stalker due to the horrid slow pacing of the movie and well the fact that nothing interesting happened.

Solaris was brilliant though, I liked it, I dare say better than even 2001: A Space Oddysey.

reply

yeah anyone who thinks any film is slow hasn't seen solyaris. VR moves at a breakneck pace by comparison.

reply

I've seen several films that feel slower than this one. This is one of the most awesome films I've ever seen. The people I've shown it to so far have enjoyed it. Nobody complained about it being slow or boring. It has the exact pace it needed.

Procrastination fools you into thinking you succeed merely by not failing.

reply

No.

It did think very highly of itself though.

reply

Ok, so you are a clueless individual who purchases a Blue Ray movie before having even a clue as to what you were getting, or whether you would even like it...

So why are you complaining here? Go to the mirror, then whine to the idiot who would do something as dumb as purchase a movie without having the slightest clue to what it was about.

reply

haha. terrific.

reply

Wait a sec, you knew it would be about vikings and you probably knew it would include fights and some brutality. But you'll never know how the movie was shot. Show me one case where it's written on the back that "this movie progresses in snail's pace". Besides, although I am not one who goes out an buys random DVDs, I am a person that hates getting spoiled. Am I asupposed to see every trailer, read every cover back and check out places like IMDb before I am going to buy/rent/watch a movie? By then you'll know the entire plot and other spoilers! Besides, you can't trust trailers these days anymore, most of them are either spoiling or misleading, usually both. And don't get me started on coverbacks ... all they will tell you is the other movies that the actors, directors or producers were involved in. And of course that this is the best movie ever. A truly informative and non-lying cover back is scarce.

reply

"Slow" doesn't mean bad; lots of great films are slow. Perhaps irraban's "beep" replaces the word "classic" or "masterpiece".

reply

Soi Cowboy is definitely slower than this.

I thought Valhalla Rising was amazing. Watched it a few times now. Just Brilliant!

"Paradox" - Arthur

reply

You actually sat thru this twice? I'll put another coat on the wall and watch that dry before I'd watch this again. You're fooling yourself, you're trying to be the hip one on the forum that "gets it", you dont really like this movie.

reply

Your pretentiousness and self-righteousness is nothing less than laughable.

reply

No "gets" a film, for everyone has their own interpretation of it.

HI F-ING YA
Nicholas Cage Deadfall
2013 Rankings imdb.com/list/2-zx4cThbEY/

reply

Hmm..might be my perception was totally wrong. Perhaps i need to watch this in different mood. I'll give it another shot.

reply

I did not find the film slow in the least. I thought the pacing and length were utterly perfect. This film is a beautiful balancing act, and here are just some of the reasons why:

Yes, the pacing is slow, but that is by design. The run time is also short, which balances that out.

I think slow feel comes largely from the lack of dialog, but that is a choice and a risk the director takes very deliberately. The absence of talky-talk and so-called clever reparte shines a bright light on the power of physical acting, as it most certainly does in this film.

Another thing that adds to the seeming "slowness" of the film are the long camera shots and use of static camera positions. I believe this was a brilliant choice by the director. It creates a painterly effect to the frames, and allows the viewer to take in the action and scenery and mood clearly and completely. The MTV quick-cut and hand held close action has been so over-used in the past two decades that we the viewers have become once again conditioned to that, and unable to appreciate the more classical approach taken by Refn. I was there, I was in the film, because in so many scenes the stillness of the camera mirrored the stillness of the characters who were in the film observing the central action.

Yes, there is a lot of almost overpowering stillness in this film. I felt that one of the over-arching themes was the wildness and harshness of the environment and nature, and how those qualities were reflected in the people. I also enjoyed just drinking in the landscapes and close shots of the natural elements - earth, stone, water, flora, sky. I think fire was absent as a deliberate choice, possibly to the detriment of the feng shui of the film, but I can allow that. The cold and the wet were clearly a foundation element in the mood of the film, fire would have corrupted that.

I think we can allow ourselves to be conditioned over time by the majority of films that are so dependent on dialog, action, wild-camera work, and fast-cut editing, that when something like this comes along we can be caught completely off-guard.

If you avoid spoilers and such, as you claim, you should also put forth the effort clear your mind of everyday Hollywood conditioning and subconscious or conscious expectations, and really meet this or any film on it's own terms. Certainly you should adjust your perceptive approach simply based on the fact that it is a European based production, not to mention the whole Scandinavian thing.

So clear your mind before watching this, or any film for that matter. As the film opens, allow the film to be itself. Try to open yourself up, and accept and embrace whatever it is that the film maker is doing for the time the film is playing. Don't fight what it is that the film wants to be until after the film is over, if you must fight it.

You don't have to like every film you see, but you will like more of them if you approach them on their own terms.

--

reply

This film actually progressed faster than I anticipated it to. I've seen some horrible movies that slowed to a crawl because of bad pacing or lack of general content. On the contrary, I found VR to be an engrossing story, rich in visuals and depth of content. Truly a brilliant film.

reply

If you want a slow and excruciating movie watch Black Dahlia! Nothing can compare to that crap.

reply

Check out Gus van Sant's "Gerry" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302674/

reply