Why I rated it a 'one'


It was really a 2 maybe 3 but because some of your cast and crew decided to "cheat" and vote it a 10 (as u admitted in other threads) i had to vote lower to even it out.

ok the reason why this was a bad "movie"

First we will talk about the sound since you urself are a DJ and it's the one thing i thought would be alright. some scenes u could barely make out what people were saying. the best example here was in the shelter when the FEMA or homeland or whatever guy (we'll talk about him again later) and skinny white trash guy were trying to settle everyone down. Plus the weak sound effects used for the guns/machineguns. I mean c'mon ur a DJ buy a good sound effects CD

Second was the camera work more noticably the lighting. OK OK i know about the super low budget and what cameras u used from the trivia section on IMDB but there was entirely too much lens flare. i know thats hard and sometimes impossible to avoid like in the traffic scene but there were alot of it elsewhere in the movie. Also in the scene where the two fat guys park and exit there car to go shooting was wayyyyy too bright and also the scene where the kids were on the trampoline. Adjusting the F-stop or using a filter is an easy way to fix that. Also be careful filming the same set of scenes at totally different times or even days. When u two were getting ready for traget practice the scene kept changing from sunny to overcast to sunny to overcast depending on the camera.

Third the acting was laughable at best the ONLY good actress was the Mother. Good being a relative term comparing to the other people in the movie. THE worst was the FEMA guy and i'm sure u as well know about this flaw. I understand he may of been a relative or a investor in the movie but as the director u should of done what was best for ur "movie". The girl over acting about not getting directions from the toothless gas station guy was a close second in "annoyingness" and what was with the little girl asking for help to find her MOM and the guy saying "would u ask a toothless guy for directions or to find ur mom"? I literaly LOL

Fourth was the "Script" C'mon be honest there wasn't a script. there prolly was an outline and possibly even a storyboard but there wasnt really a script at least not one that was used alot. The reason why i know this to be true was the fact espicailly when the two fat guys (yes i know u gary are one of them) were talking you two would would constantly talk over each other and thats the biggest no-no when it comes to dialouge. All you guys did was call each other a *beep* and "ur a hardcore partier" and "ur stupid no ur stupid"

Last but not least was the fact that most of the characters were either Nameless or not established. The viewer has to have at least one person to whom they can identify or feel sympathy for. The only characters name i knew was the mothers michelle conner and i only remember that one because when u two went to her house to look for her you called out her full name just in case there was another michelle in her house lol. oh yeah Sirius the dog was the other name i remebered cuz i figured u guys named him after the sat radio company.

i wont complain abouut the plot holes like others did in these posts i just wanna know the answer to two questions

1. Why did the landlines and cable go out well b4 the expolsion?
2. In the first scene in the basement why did he fat guy look at his wrist and say it was time to go when it was obvious that he wasnt wearing a watch? Was it a homage to caddyshack 2? when chevy chase did it


Thank you for reading my post and b4 to tear me a new one remember you asked why some people voted it a one and u also asked for a detailed reason why.
Also i didnt spell check this so i dont want any childish remarks like "well ur an idiot u spelled so and so wrong"

I am located in New Jersey so if u want to either kick my as s or invite me to help in the sequel (since i obviously think im an expert in my own mind) i would be happy to do either.

reply

It was really a 2 maybe 3 but because some of your cast and crew decided to "cheat" and vote it a 10 (as u admitted in other threads) i had to vote lower to even it out.

That is kind of unfair... just because what the cast does should not make you vote a one to even it out. I am sure if you made a film and your cast was behind it they would do the same thing. Wouldn't you agree. It is not like I asked them to go vote it a 10. I even sent out an email and mentioned to them several times if you vote for it on IMDB vote fairly. The fact I admit the votes are possibly swayed by cast lets those know I am willing be forth right an honest about how the cast & crew would treat a film they worked on.

ok the reason why this was a bad "movie"

First we will talk about the sound since you urself are a DJ and it's the one thing i thought would be alright. some scenes u could barely make out what people were saying. the best example here was in the shelter when the FEMA or homeland or whatever guy (we'll talk about him again later) and skinny white trash guy were trying to settle everyone down. Plus the weak sound effects used for the guns/machineguns. I mean c'mon ur a DJ buy a good sound effects CD

Yep, the sound is sh!t in some areas...I agree 100%. I didn't have a sound guy until halfway through the shoot and we had to use a shot gun mic at times... That scene you described at the time it was filmed sounded good through the headphones but when I dumped the footage something went wacky. I have been trying to figure this out until this day, but without the proper ADR equipment or resources I am kind of stuck.

I did buy a Sound FX disc set and was pissed when I blew $100 for it and ended up what I ended up with. Luckily just before the theatrical release I was able to find better sound FX and replaced a majority of them... The Machine gun sounds are still a bitch and half to find decent ones unless you spend $$$$ which at the moment isn't happening.

Being a DJ really has nothing to do with sound. As a Dj you spin music, the clubs I worked at had sound systems installed by professional tech's. Plus what I hear through headphones in a club is much different then you would hear on the floor.

However, I do agree the sound needs work.


Second was the camera work more noticably the lighting. OK OK i know about the super low budget and what cameras u used from the trivia section on IMDB but there was entirely too much lens flare. i know thats hard and sometimes impossible to avoid like in the traffic scene but there were alot of it elsewhere in the movie. Also in the scene where the two fat guys park and exit there car to go shooting was wayyyyy too bright and also the scene where the kids were on the trampoline. Adjusting the F-stop or using a filter is an easy way to fix that. Also be careful filming the same set of scenes at totally different times or even days. When u two were getting ready for traget practice the scene kept changing from sunny to overcast to sunny to overcast depending on the camera.

The blown out scene you are talking about is actually addressed in the commentary. the DP was unable to shoot that weekend and since I was new to the process and we had to get it done I had to take over. It didn't look as blown out on the monitor as the raw footage did when i dumped it, so i crushed it contrast to take the edge off and it work a great bit. You should of seen it before. Since the DP wasn't present, I gave myself the "additional photography" credit so he didnot get blame for the way overlit scenes.

The gun scene was all filmed within a two hour window... The damn sky kept going crazy on us... As soon as we were ready to shoot the sun would duck back in and then suddenly appear again. Because of the tight schedule... this wasn't an option to come back and re-do. Again another item I believe I addressed in the commentary. You wanna see a bad mismatch of lighting and scenes check out F13 part 1. In some scenes the film is shot in the dead of winter while others are in the middle of summer.

The traffic Jam lighting and graininess was done purposely that way, right down to the cameras used. It could have been a little better lit I agree, but when you have 6 hours of night time each day for 6 days to do X amount of sequences you kinda have to push it. Why some scenes look better is that we went back out to the street a year later for some pick-ups and I wanted the DP to use the Sony VX2000 which a majority of that sequence was filmed with he said the DVX100 would be better. His experience is what I trusted and it was a bitch matching it up... But again inexperience played a role on my part. I don't regret using the DVX100, but once i watched the dumped footage I should have insisted on it.

Thomas Fant is also the guy who deserves the credit on a lot of the cinematic feels most of this film has. He did a fab job on no pay and busted his ass with no crew to work with. Believe me him choosing the DVX100 was a good choice for overall quality it just doesn't match the original TJ footage.


Third the acting was laughable at best the ONLY good actress was the Mother. Good being a relative term comparing to the other people in the movie. THE worst was the FEMA guy and i'm sure u as well know about this flaw. I understand he may of been a relative or a investor in the movie but as the director u should of done what was best for ur "movie". The girl over acting about not getting directions from the toothless gas station guy was a close second in "annoyingness" and what was with the little girl asking for help to find her MOM and the guy saying "would u ask a toothless guy for directions or to find ur mom"? I literaly LOL

the toothless guy scene was meant to be funny. I did that un-purpose, but again listening to the commentary would explain the actors and actresses in most roles. The FEMA guy actually did two roles, he was the police dispatcher and I brought him back as the FEMA guy. While again no one is professional, I think a lot of people set their sites that $11,000 films need to have the caliber of acting like a scorsese picture. Of course there is going to be subpar acting in no budget indie films, it is to be expected.

Fourth was the "Script" C'mon be honest there wasn't a script. there prolly was an outline and possibly even a storyboard but there wasnt really a script at least not one that was used alot. The reason why i know this to be true was the fact espicailly when the two fat guys (yes i know u gary are one of them) were talking you two would would constantly talk over each other and thats the biggest no-no when it comes to dialouge. All you guys did was call each other a *beep* and "ur a hardcore partier" and "ur stupid no ur stupid"

That scene was not scripted, if referring to the dialogue in the car after the opening credits. However, in terms of hanging out with real people and knowing them for 3+ years and knowing their family and party habits, that is actually more on par than the crap I see in Hollywood fair where some guy claims he partied all night then flashing back to him puking in an alley somewhere. The other guy Brian, whom you refer to as Fat guy #2, he actually isn't fat, however, if you must use the term yes I am fat and if thats a problem then maybe you should have turned the film off. Every film wants to have pretty people, you try to the EVERYDAY joe thing... someone you would actually see walking down the street, and people act like you are doing them a disservice. It seems like if Brad Pitt isn't cast... then a movie isn't watchable. I dunno about you but I am sick of seeing pretty people in horror films, and them going through the entire film without looking worn out or beat up.

Last but not least was the fact that most of the characters were either Nameless or not established. The viewer has to have at least one person to whom they can identify or feel sympathy for. The only characters name i knew was the mothers michelle conner and i only remember that one because when u two went to her house to look for her you called out her full name just in case there was another michelle in her house lol. oh yeah Sirius the dog was the other name i remebered cuz i figured u guys named him after the sat radio company.

The dog... I think he was named before Sirius existed... it is Brians dog, and I believe he is named after the cloud not the radio station. To be honest I can't remember why they named him that, but trust me it wasn't after Sirius Radio since we are both XM users. LOL... I know Brians name is mentioned, Mine, and Kevins. I also know the Shelter director identifies himself to the crowd as Tom Anderson, and the head Military guys address one of the soldiers as 'Abel'. Dave is never mentioned by name as it is not really necessary to the plot of the film, I just named him Dave because when i was doing the credits... Dave sounded better than "Only Traffic Jam Survivor Wearing White T-shirt." Even cutting it down to White-T-Shirt guy seemed kind goofy so I just used his name.

We all use our real names because being none of the leads aside from Dave ever acted before it would be easier to remember our real names as opposed to being in a scene and trying to remember... Hey Rupert or Jim Bob or whatever. Plus it made it feel more natural to us and made it feel more real.. at least to me.


i wont complain abouut the plot holes like others did in these posts i just wanna know the answer to two questions

1. Why did the landlines and cable go out well b4 the expolsion?

The original script for Deadlands was one year after the start of the outbreak and was deemed to expensive to shoot. When revised to an outbreak script the original version sent to the copyright office had a scene explaining how a terrorist organization was systematically shutting down key parts of the infastructure in 5 major cities before unleashing a powerful bio-chemical weapon. I have scenes written in detail of the city being blown apart and rescue crews going to find bodies left and right all over the place and as the clean up began... the bodies started waking up. Instead of trying to fake filming those and looking like crap... I just abandon that section of the script in favor of the Radio Dj reports which is you listen to closely explain what exactly is happening.

The DP suggested we film the Terrorists plotting the Baltimore assualt but we ran out of money and time, and in retrospect I would have loved to film it, but it never happened. When I had to revise Deadlands to an outbreak script I wanted to capture the things you had never seen in a zombie film.

Traffic Jams, Shelters, people on the road trying to find safety and family. Now I would have loved to see tons more panic in the TJ sequences, cars exploding as written in the © script, people trying to drive their cars away and crashing and hitting other people etc etc, but when you have x amount of dollars you have to scale things back to the bare essentials. Deadlands is really a concept film. In that I was hoping to make a zombie film of all the things I would like to see be done in a real big budgeted zombie film in hopes of someone catching the film and seeking out the original screenplay or somehow getting the scratch together to do a bigger budgeted remake.

After editing it together and showing it to people outside the cast & crew I was getting some great feedback, in which people caught onto what I was trying to do but understood the inexperience and the resources were not there to do it. However, they did get the concept of the project, and that was what I was hoping for. Not everyone is going to see past the acting and certain other elements, but when you go back and look at it after reading this I guarantee you will open your eyes a lot more.


2. In the first scene in the basement why did he fat guy look at his wrist and say it was time to go when it was obvious that he wasnt wearing a watch? Was it a homage to caddyshack 2? when chevy chase did it

Bingo... plus I am that guy. I am Gary. When I scripted that scene out I was watching a Chevy Chase film that night...and I caught him doing it and I am a huge Chevy Chase fan so it was my nod to Chevy. I know I didn't give it the justice he did, but wanted to honor him nonetheless.


Thank you for reading my post and b4 to tear me a new one remember you asked why some people voted it a one and u also asked for a detailed reason why.
Also i didnt spell check this so i dont want any childish remarks like "well ur an idiot u spelled so and so wrong"

I will be the last one to judge spelling, especially on an internet message board... well I have done it sometimes, but I am not overly anal about it.. I am glad you explained your reason, but admitting that it was at least a 2 or 3 but giving it a 1 because I mentioned the cast probably voted it a ten is really unfair in my opinion, but it is your decision and I don't hate you for it... Don't agree with it, but don't hate you for it.

Hopefully the above will help you see Deadlands in a different light and the intentions behind the film.

Also, please anyone else reading this don't jump down his throat or get tough ont he subject he is making a clear and concise opinion with questions needing an answer... I wish more people did this when giving their opinions on films.

Thanks

Dj aka Gary


I am located in New Jersey so if u want to either kick my as s or invite me to help in the sequel (since i obviously think im an expert in my own mind) i would be happy to do either.

If you are willing to come to Maryland to help shoot a film... and work for $5.00 and a bag of cheeto's... You will never get a NO from any of us.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

Zombie Lake, all is forgiven...
Only joking, it wasnt quite that bad :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


It was really a 2 maybe 3 but because some of your cast and crew decided to "cheat" and vote it a 10 (as u admitted in other threads) i had to vote lower to even it out.

How many of the 10 ratings do you recon are from the cast and crew?

reply

Hard to say... When i mentioned that it was a few weeks or maybe a month or more ago... I would say maybe 50% at least. Just to be safe maybe 60%.

Hard to tell.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

Hey Gary,

I did feel a bit tricked after I saw the rating your film had in comparison to what it was worth, I have however given it a 3/10 which I think is a fair score in my opinion.

I love the fact that you've answered questions on IMDB, after reading your responses, even though I wasn't overly fond of the film for reasons previously specified, I can definately see where you were going and I sincerely hope you get the funding to produce a good zombie flick in the future.

Don't forget the lessons Romero has taught though, gore is extremely important in a zombie flick.

reply

Since when did Romero teach us that?..

Night of the Living Dead... Come ON.

reply

Actually, I wanted to stay away from gore as I felt it is getting way overdone in horror films in general. I remember watching Dawn of the Dead and being shocked, or excited about the visceral kill scenes in the film, then Day of the Dead, just blew that out of the water... now everyone is a on a kill crazy rampage and the use of extreme gore doesn't have the pull it once did.

Aside from Land of the Dead, I think Romero's 3 other dead films are the best in the zombie world. Land, just sort of was blah to me, and the main reasn was the character of Big Daddy, but I also felt the gore was a bit too much. In his early days he used it sparingly until the big payoff... which is how most films have done it, now every 5 seconds someone is getting their head chopped off and it takes all the fun out of gore.

I chose to curtail it back for another reason... budget. When you're working with so little money you don't want to go overboard with things. Many low budget zombie films, tend to do this, and I think it cheapens the films. I figured I would do it more in the cinematic tone of an R-rated film in which you get something decent, but not over the top... just enough to make you smile.

Deadlands was also never meant to be a bloodbath. Romero was onto something with Dawn and Day in which the gore scenes also made you feel uncomfortable because of the amount of violence that was involved surrounding the kill. This is something I tried to do in that, it may not be a bloody shot, but it will make you have that response of either.... ewwww, nice... or cool.

I ams sure Mrgoodbomb would agree that the film isn't gory but what little there is makes it a little better. It's not really the amount of gore you have in a film it is how creative the gore is... I have never seen a zombie tear someones throat out by hand, nor have I ever seen zombies tear a mans spine out... those are two things I wanted to do and accomplished. I felt those were cringe worthy moments, as did many people in our audience at the premiere.

While I felt Zack Snyder's DAWN was not gory enough I liked the film, and while I felt Land had too much gore it does ive the gore hounds something to talk about. If you have seen Return of the Living Dead... the gore in that film is pretty much the same pace I used in Deadlands... not a lot just enough.

I know it sounds strange that a zombie film fan whom made a film would say this, but we need to make zombies horrifying again, not just make them gore hungry murderers... which is all they have become. People love zombie films, they are usually the most rented films, but there are so many people spoofing on them or going over the top it is killing our beloved genre.

I have hopes Diary will bring Romero back to form and we can make this movie monster get back on top where he belongs, and not just use him as a way to over use 100 gallons of stage blood.



http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

I'm pretty sure 60% that voted a 10 is cast members, and other 40% are they friends and families. Not to mention some user comments are obviously fake too!

I'm with the others that this movie is a 2 or 3. And I'm also giving it a big fat 1 to at least even out a little!

reply

Well I did my own User Comment quoting a review from Rogue Cinema. Can't speak for the others except for the one admitting they were a cast member and they gave it a 6 I believe, so I don't know why that would be considered fake.

However, I am curious how you came to the conclusion the other 40% are friends and family. Is this an assumption? Remember when you make an assumption you make an ass out of you and umption. =)

I can definitely rule out family. I am pretty much an Only Child. One step sister who is 20 years older and lives in Staten Island... Mom and Dad are in their 70's and Mom doesn't even know how to turn on a PC and dad needs help navigating AOL, so that pretty much rules out family.

Friends, aside from the cast & crew... what other friends do you speak of? Any friend I had was in this film. So that is why I said 60% are most likely cast & crew.

Not everyone hates Deadlands. Google "Deadlands: The Rising Reviews" There are over 26 reviews giving the film a positive rating, pretty much an average of 80% of those whom review it like it. Giving a one to even something out is kind of strange, but your choice. I don't see how it is evening things out considering it has 28 1's to 18 10's as of 04/29/2007 at 4:23pm. Evening it out would be giving it a true vote, but what puzzles me is people say it is a 2 or 3 but they voted it one... because of blah blah blah. Which pretty much means, you lied about your feeling for the movie and are cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not trying to pick a fight here, as you can tell from other topics I openly discuss the film with anyone, but seriously go back and read what you typed and think about that. How is anyone to take you seriously when you openly admitted you gave a false rating out of spite.




http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

[deleted]

Where can i obtain a copy of this said "deadlands" film? I am interested in purchasing one.

reply

eBay is the cheapest way to get it. Or you can buy it straight from the distributor. www.tempevideo.com

If you have netflix you can rent it online.

________
"Is this another "my dick is bigger than your dick" contest?

reply

While I'd agree it's a tad unfair to give something a one just to "even out the votes", I have to say a one was probably what it really deserved.
Meaning no offense to the director, it was almost painful to watch.
A few things I would've done differently (and none of them would've cost any more to do):
1. The "Five Minute Carnage Rule": A low budget horror movie really needs some decent bloodshed in the first five minutes to establish interest. Dawn of the Dead 2004 is a good example of opening carnage.
2. Take that CD off repeat. I'm talking about the backing music, it didn't seem to change thoughout the entire movie.
3. Attack shots. A look at some of the better zombie movies makes the difference obvious. The closer you get to the zombie (and the longer you leave the camera right in his/her face) the worse they look. Keep shots brief so people are less likely to notice the cheaper gore effects.
4. Zombie movement. The guy in the yellow t-shirt looked like an extra from the Thriller clip. Something more subtle would probably have looked better.
A lot of it looked half-assed, like the zombies had somewhere better to be and just wanted to get the hell out of there.
5. Don't blame the budget. Undead (an Aussie low budget zombie movie) ran out of money (if my memory serves me correctly) ten days into filming. Despite this, it is probably one of the best low budget movies I've ever seen.

reply

Keep in mind UNDEAD also had a budget of $1,000,000.00 USD when comparing Aussie cash to US cash.

Please take no offense to this but I am a little tired of people comparing my film to films with $1,000,000 budgets. Whether you take into account transfer rates or inflation these films had 100 times my budget, if I had a million dollars believe me it would have looked ten times better.

If comparing Deadlands to other films their budgets need to be equal, Like if you would have said El Mariachi, then boom ya got me, but comparing it to UNDEAD... they are completely different types of films made on different types of cameras with different budgets.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

Hate to say it but $1,000,000 wouldn't have improved the acting any.
My comment about Undead had less to do with the size of the budget and more to do with the fact that EVEN when they had run out of money they still managed to make an awesome looking movie using CG to fake the stuff they couldn't afford to do. Money doesn't make a movie good (although it might help to a certain extent) just look at all the Hollywood blockbusters with million dollar budgets that are crap. *cough* (Land of the Dead).
At it's core a horror movie needs to be scary... or at least TRY to be scary. Yours really wasn't. Not even cheap scares involving sudden loud noises or the like.
I read a comment about how someone thought it was gory...watching a zombie munch on shoddy looking internal odds and sods does not make a movie gory in any positive way. Take Pulp Fiction, some would say one of the most violent and gory (eg. brain splatter on the back seat) films ever made, yet you never see any of the violence, only the aftermath. It's a cheap way to do gory violence that works without making it look like a Discovery Channel documentary on the feeding behaviour of zombies.
All that said, I was being constructive, the last thing I'd want to do is discourage the people who contribute to the only genre I watch just to be unpleasant. But like Robert Rodriguez said, "You make 40 bad movies before you make a good one."

reply

I completely understand where you are coming from, but this wasn't meant to be a gore filled filmed. As I stated it was more of an homage film and a concept piece from the get go.

I have a huge problem with indie zombie films whom go gore crazy because it is way overdone, and it looks cheesy, I wanted to just show enough to get the point across, and like Tom Savini said the viewers mind can make it ten times worse than anything you can show, you just have to start them off. That is all I ever intended to do.

This film is more or less an homage to the zombie films I grew up watching, though not ripping them off, but just giving slight nods here and there. However, the set pieces were something I wanted and needed. I wanted to see a resuce shelter become overrun, a traffic jam of cars get wiped out.

Of course money won't help acting, considering no one is a professional actor. That seems the biggest thing most people seem to forget when watching this film, or they rag on the characters for being heavy set or FAT. Yes I could have scaled the entire city looking for people to make it look better, but why not use real people and give the film a real person feel, not some pretty actor or actress.

I stand behind my decision in using the people I used, and yes they are friends, but I have had enough reviews from major horror websites stating this as one of the films shining moments, yes the acting is bad or horrible, but not everyone is going to hit a homerun their first time out, but if some of the bigger horror fans and websites admit the use of everyday looking people was the right way to go, then they understand and connected with what I was trying to convey.

However, I have seen my fair share of indie zombie films, and I feel the acting in this is way better than 100's of other indie zombie films. I don't say this to rag on the other guys, but I did give my actors direction, and I did do multiple takes and I used what i felt to be the best take of each bunch. I didn't just yelll action or cut. I did my best to work with everyone.

As far as the CGI... It is something I don't care for, plus if it isn't done or budgeted right it looks hammy and cheesy. Since I am a novice at Visual FX I kept it simple. If and when the time comes and the money to get something else going and the use of CGI is done properly then I will use it, but I am not going to try and put CGI into an $11,000 film when I know it will look like hell. I am against CGI as it is an easy way to pull off practical FX, instead of taking the time to do them. At this level of filmmaking it looks cheap and disconnects the audience because it doesn't look or feel real.

I know not everyone is going to like this film, I have come to grips with that, and I don't mind intelligent criticism, but when people start making comparisons I have to questions their thought process because I wonder if they are actually reading what they are typing. I mean lets be honest... Not everyone is going to like this film, and it is not my job to convince you to like it. I did my job, I brought the story I could tell on the budget I had, and the rest is in the hands of the critics and audience.

I do take the criticism and look at it constructively from both ends, the good and bad, but I am sorry, I refuse to debate my film compared to a film with 100 times my budget, even if they ran out of money, they still had $989,000 more dollars than I had. The only thing I can do know is look at what i have and try to improve on that for the next film, and believe me I have been taking a lot of notes.

Anyway, thanks for posting your thoughts and taking the time out to watch the film. I appreciate it and your time to chit chat a little about it.

Gary

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=71742049

reply

$1,000,000 could probably improve your wall of text posts.
(no offense)

reply

i didnt see this yet, but i wanted to bring to your attention the possibility that ever movie posted on here can be tainted by biased "10" ratings from the cast and crew, so unless you give every movie on IMDB a "1", your unfairly prejudicing these guys.

reply

I rated it a 'one' because I got screwed on the credits and didn't even get a contributor's copy for my efforts.

reply

What *beep* effort?

How many times do you have to be told, your contribution was never filmed, or used.

Seriously, drop it you sound pathetic.

________
"Is this another "my dick is bigger than your dick" contest?

reply

Wow. I can't believe you actually managed to work up the courage to respond.

Beats the *beep* outta ducking my emails, huh Gary?

reply


What emails? I haven't had an email from you since you got banned from Homepage of the Dead . com

Everyone knows my email, its on the friggin website for the film.

And I will stand up to this because you know its *beep* and I even told you 4 years ago when we talked I didn't have the money to film the scene so therefore your contribution wouldn't be included.

So stop beating a dead horse... unless you just want attention... if that is the case, by all means have at it man.
________
"Is this another "my dick is bigger than your dick" contest?

reply

Kiss my ass, Gary. You stopped responding to my emails just as soon as I got banned from the Ho page.

You took what I wrote, reworked it a little so that it could technically be considered your own stuff, and then tried to pass it on as original.

When you sent me that chunk of *beep* you called a script and asked me to help you, I was all for it. But, when I told people that I was helping you, a whole bunch told me that you were a snake and would try to pull some greasy *beep* And, they were right.

Hell, you had it planned all along when I asked you for an "additional dialogue" credit, and you suggested a "special thanks" instead. And, I didn't even get that.

Then, you promised me a copy of the DVD for my efforts....and, you bailed on that, too.

You're nothing but 500lbs of *beep* in a 10lb bag.

reply

Do you like listening to yourself DC? Just curious... You can chirp like the little birdy all you want, but... you did nothing for this film, and considering your bash it all to hell anyway, what would be the point of having credit in it, not that you are OWED or deserve any, again your scene was never used or filmed, nor was it ever RE-WORKED as you put it.

The only thing ever reshot for this film was the scene when Michelle and her son leave the house, everything else was filmed as per the script I put together.

However, the script and contribution you are referring to, that you did help with, was the post apocalytpic version of Deadlands.... before I changed it to an outbreak flick and added the subtitle "The Rising" that contribution never was used or made it into the film that is out now. It still sits in the screenplay that is on my desk and has been there for 4 years.

As far as a screener... I offered you a screener a few times. I even sent you clips of the film as it is while I was doing the editing so you could see it coming along.

In regards to email... again my email address hasn't changed in 5 years, I never received a single email from you after you were banned from HPotD because of your retarded outbursts, sort of like the one you're having here now.

Yet when you were banned I was one of a few members who lobbied for your reinstatement, but you had to send your bitch, into the forums to do your dirty work and post a lot of stupid *beep* about anything and everything.

back when you got booted you up and disappeared. You had AIM, and I went out of my way to install AIM to keep in touch, although I use YIM, and yet you never once clicked on my username to check in or say a goddamn word, and what gets me is that 3 *beep* years ago when this question was posed about your special thanks... I said you wouldn't be getting it then and why would it change now.

Are you that upset, that for 3+ years your worried about a credit in a film you claim sucks anyway? That you had no part in writing.

You helped with the ORIGINAL script when it was set in the zombie infested future, not, in this cut down version. Again, your contribution wasn't used, nor filmed... so if you want to keep going on this rant of yours and acting like the spoiled internet brat we all know you are then so be it... I have better things to do.

Sorry I wasted my time fighting to get you unbanned from HpotD. The community has been better off without you.

When you EARN credit you get it... when you don't you won't. No one gets a free ride DC. You of all people should know this... good day sir. You have just landed on my ignore list.

________
"Is this another "my dick is bigger than your dick" contest?

reply

I gave it a '2', only because '1' is preserved for movies I can't stand watching until the end.
Those fake users and reviews tricked me into thinking that I was going to watch an epic movie, so I kept on watching hoping for a miracle to happen so this could actually be called a "movie"... Unfortunately, this never happened!
The funny thing is all of those arguments and fights in this forum over the "storyline" and the "script".... Seriously? Does this piece of garbage actually have a script??? Hell my 15 years old neighbor can do better than that with a cellphone's camera! lol

reply