MovieChat Forums > Timber Falls (2008) Discussion > Man! I love the torture scene, he is dam...

Man! I love the torture scene, he is damn hot!


I love the torture scene, he is damn hot! Shirtless and sweat! I'm dying for that scence. I wish someone posted it on YouTube!

reply

What happens in the scene? I have been trying to see this movie, but I don't think it was ever released where I live. Spoil away!

reply

Well, (coughs) have you heard of torrents? ;-)
And the movie itself is not good at all so don't regret it. ;-]

reply

you people are sick

reply

[deleted]

well in the scene deacon is looking for a weapon to tourture mike with and he finds a whip he starts whipping him and after awhile he pours acholol on his back but he does look hot he does have a sexy body

reply

Or at least some shredded boxers or something!

reply

Usually torture scenes involving a male victim have a phony ring to them in the movies because the man is allowed to keep his pants on. Such modesty! In reality, torture victims are routinely stripped naked, (if only for psychological reasons), and every torturer knows that the fastest way to break a man is to go to work on his genitals. However, since the villains in "Timber Falls" want to use Josh Randall specifically for his procreating abilities, it would make sense that they'd leave his genitals undamaged. (But maybe they'd pull down his pants to at least give them a visual inspection.) What bothers me about the torture scene is that the whip doesn't look nasty enough to cause such damage to Josh's back, especially after only a few lashes. The splash of alcohol on the back is a great touch, however. As for the hot iron, why doesn't the woman press it directly into one of Josh's nipples?

reply

okay, his body is sick and i don't mind at all he's hangin from shackles...

reply

sick sick puppy

reply

I'm assuming your a woman but I guess you could be a gay man. Anyhow, my point: If a man were to comment about loving a scene where a woman was being tortured, it would cause quite a bit of controversy. He would be could 'sick' and 'sexist'.
Get my point?

reply