MovieChat Forums > Arranged (2009) Discussion > good movie, terrible message.

good movie, terrible message.


nicely filmed and directed, very well acted, terribly written.
what exactly is the message? that arranged marriage is okay because god will make sure everything works out? or is it just american politeness keeping this movie from taking a stand on a very serious matter. i was disgusted.
i'm sure that the families depicted in the movie really exist, there are probably many good, loving parents arranging the marriages of their sons and daughters, but does that make it alright? apparently, the ends justifies the means, as the final scene would have us believe with it's misunderstood feminism. i could go on and on but i think the movie speaks for itself. yuck.

reply

[deleted]

try one, and see for yourself

reply

nothing if u dont mind being forced to marry somebody u dont even know lol its just not acceptable to many people like americans and stuff arranged marriges are aweful and unfair the movie has a terribel messege in my oppinion lol but i guess if an arranged marriage works for u then good for u then lol

reply

and these 2 people were forced to marry someone they didn't know? Did you even watch the movie?

reply

there is nothing wrong with it, if they have the choice. choice is the theme of this movie. some people choose to kill others, some people choose to be good and others choose to have arranged marriages, its the american dream really, choosing whatever you want, and the freedom to do so.

reply

there is nothing wrong with it, if they have the choice. choice is the theme of this movie. some people choose to kill others, some people choose to be good and others choose to have arranged marriages, its the american dream really, choosing whatever you want, and the freedom to do so.

Well said, chatup! I totally agree. I wouldn't want an arranged marriage for myself, but if someone else is fine with it and has a choice about it and isn't being forced or coerced into it, that's none of my business.

Peter, is your social worker in that horse?

reply

That's very judgemental on your part. Many countries and cultures do arranged marriages, like italians, spanish, Jewish, muslims etc. I don't see your point.

reply

seriously what are you talking about...italians and spanish dont do arranged marriages and dont compare them to muslims.

get your facts right before commenting on something

reply

trancefark. You obviously don't have a wide array of demographic worldly sensibilities. Yes they do get arranged marriages to this day. Not all, very few do. But in the small communities they do.

reply

I agree with Heywood_Jablomey -
There are arranged marriages ALL OVER THE WORLD! I have studied various historical cultures, both present, and past, and throughout world history, there have been TONS of arranged marriages...
Look at any patriarchal society, any monarchy, anywhere that people have class systems.
The point of the movie is whatever YOU take away from it. So if you take away that its a good idea to live in harmony, and that we all have beliefs, and choice, like I did, then great! If you took something else away from this movie, that's great too. Just remember, no two people are the same, no matter how many similarities we share.

reply

Um. Yes they do. Arranged marriages happen in this country, too. It might not be as out in the open or obvious but believe me it happens in American families. My mother flat out asked me if I could consider seriously dating and marrying a family friend's son, and when I said no she pushed my older cousin at him. They're getting married in a month. How is that not a form of arranged marriage??

reply

OP, yes, same here

geez, that was happy ending? two young women sitting already with children instead of doing career like everyone else?

and same thing with arranged marriages, it's totally oldfashioned, this movie has definitely very bad message when it's saying it's natural to be watching potential partners only by religion, muslims between muslims, jews between jews - it's totally sick idea, I don't care about religion, I can be living with muslim, jew, christian or atheist woman because it doesn't matter on that stupid thing at normal people, it's everyone's personal thing what he believes, it's sick when parents are looking for partners for children like they weren't adult and have no own brain

it was very funny comedy to watch these oldfashioned people with all their complexes, but ending was horrible, they should leave it open, so we don't know if muslim girl will marry muslim boyfriend or if jewish girl will find another christian guy, because new jew boyfriend wasn't good in bed for instance

reply

[deleted]

Abby, so do you find looking for your partner by religion to be normal thing? You step into bar, start talking with girl and you ask her btw. are you jewish, no, it sux, go away stupid christian! Because this is message of this movie - parents are looking for partners for their children by religion. In normal situation adult man is looking for partner on it's own and he decides if religion is some of his criterion. In this movie parents decided atheists, christians and buddhists are bad people for their daughters and they just choose between muslims and jews, it's sick (and it's btw. really ill, because after some time these people will get degenerated, similar like doing sex between family members, this just takes longer time without taking different people into this).

Peter Markoff
If you don't like my english, write it to me in my own language.

reply

It's normal for anyone to find a partner by finding something you share in common with that person whether it be religion, race, culture, age, interests. Does it really matter what it is? If a person wants to date someone their own religion, what's wrong with that? It's their choice! And parents do that all the time, because their parents did that with them. It's just what they were raised with. But since we live in America, the culture is different and we're used to dating people by other standards. Who are you to say what's right and wrong? Everyone is different. Get over it!

reply

Himiko, problem of this movie is that those girls didn't have choice, because their parents gave them ultimatum - you must marry (jew/muslim) otherwise your family won't talk to you, if this is freedom or choice I dunno where you live, but it's not very free country. In normal families doesn't matter what partners children have, parents will still love them and it's not question of religion and partners approved by them.

Peter Markoff
If you don't like my english, write it to me in my own language.

reply

Ummm..no they didnt, idk where ur getting ur info from, but Im muslim and in islam, the marriage isnt valid if either party (man or woman) doesnt want to marry the other person. The whole point of the movie was that as muslims or jews, there is a choice in marriage. We cant be forced to marry someone we dont want to or else the marraige isnt valid. There isnt anything wrong with your parents helping you find someone to marry.

reply

first: the movie is hardly about free choice. the freedom to choose only between partners approved by your family is not true freedom. that would include the choice of not getting married, which is obviously not an option to any of the two young women.

the discussion of course has its roots in religion via tradition. arranged marriage is one of the reasons the three big monotheistic religions of today has survived for so many years. jews are married to jews to ensure that their children are brought up jewish etc.

and yes, cultural conviction is what makes us who we are. unless we simply choose not to let that conviction dictate the way we live. if the conviction is in the way of our happiness, progress or what we know to be morally right, maybe the conviction should be filed with all the other things that has met those criteria through the ages. it wasn't so long ago, when most women didn't think they should be allowed to vote (still aren't in a large part of the muslim world). clearly a result of a patriarchal society, as i think arranged marriage is. the comment i made about misunderstood feminism in my original post, was aimed at the final scene when the two young mothers talk about how they are going to train their husbands. looking at the balance of power in their respective families, the girls seem to be quite disillusioned. the ability to trick or sweet talk your partner into making decisions that suit you, does not make you his or her equal.

these girls where brought up to believe that (arranged) marriage is an inevitable fact of life, and that the alternative is an undesirable life in sin and, i believe, rejection from family and friends. but even if you believe that picking up casual lovers in bars is a sin, there are other ways to find a potential partner. people do meet in libraries and supermarkets.

reply

The people who know you best are the best choice to help you make such an important decision and to make it successfully. Rochel was right - what is so normal about getting drunk and sleeping with random boys and reading horoscopes to decide who is right for you?


Ironically, it wasn't Rochel's people who had known her all her life who helped her to find her mate; it was her friend whom she'd just met - who was of another religion, as a matter of fact.

There are many other ways of meeting people to date besides getting drunk at a bar. As another person said on this thread, people do meet in libraries and supermarkets. I've also heard of people meeting by joining choruses, or by taking classes together.

-The Divine Ms Slim

http://youtube.com/AndreJaxon

reply

Firstly, I think the concept of choice here is a little narrow-minded. A choice is between freedom/doing what you want or doing what others want/abiding by cultural rules? Choice is about making a decision between the options you've been given, even if the the options aren't palpable. She had a choice between losing her family or marrying someone her parents thought who were appropriate for her. Some people love their families that much.

Secondly, my parents had an arranged marriage and to-date I haven't seen a couple (married or unmarried) more in love. So not all arranged marriages are a disaster. Forced marriages are another matter.

Thirdly, sometimes religious and cultural symbiosis is necessary for a conducive marriage. It may not be for you or another percentage of people but it is for some and that is no reason to assume that somebody is oppressed or suppressed.

Fourthly, abusive arranged marriages. Are you trying to tell me that 'love' marriages aren't also riddle with domestic violence and abuse? Of course there are and plenty of people don't leave those marriages for a variety of reasons. Same is applicable to arranged marriages and how that pans out is another story.

Also just to clarify, even though my parents had an arranged marriage, my parents do not expect me to have one. In fact I have the freedom to date and marry whoever I wish so long as that person treats me with respect.

And the assumption that an arranged marriage resulted in the girls giving up their careers is also ridiculous. Plenty of love marriages result in women with degrees becoming housewives because that is their choice. And there is no reason why they can't continue their career. Again I use my mother as an example - my mother was a tutor when I was a toddler and when I was old enough she went back to teaching full time and has an incredible career and my father has never said no to it and neither did her in-laws.

Also plenty of love marriages result in wives giving up their careers because of the way their husbands think.

It's too convenient and easy to pigeon-hole a lifestyle that we know nothing about.

Sophia Harris

reply

>Sophia Harris (from op)
Thank you for bringing some good arguments to this discussion.
You are of course right about "free choice" not being an absolute. And I believe "love" marriages carries as much grief as arranged ones, and sets the same limits to a potential career. But that is not my point.

To boil it down: My problem is with parents limiting the choices of their adult children based on (in this case) religion, and the way this movie defends these. If the movie was about parents arranging marriages based on race, would your arguments be the same? The fact that many arranged marriages are relatively successful doesn't hold any real value in this dispute as we are discussing morals, not efficiency.

By the way i see marriage as a silly tradition, especially between non-religious people.

reply

Elektrofunk great question.

I would stand by those arguments even in those circumstances. Like I said in my previous post religious, racial and cultural symbiosis are conducive to marriages for some people. I think it's a matter of mentality - whether the couple in question would willingly adapt to the new life ahead of them. When it comes to race I think, unless you have grow up in a culturally liberal environment and have had the choice to be whatever you wanted to be, it's harder to adapt to other cultures.

And why is the race concept limited to colour or religion - British Asians who get married to people South Asians (of the same religion and the same community) have a hard time in their relationships because of the adjustments required in attitudes and culture.

Most of the times films don't 'defend' this concept. I don't feel the film was defending anything but rather portraying in a different light the concept of arranged marriages interracially.

And the concept of success of a marriage is usually limited to the idea that the relationship didn't end in divorce. Successful marriages are where both partners are happy with each other, not staying with each other on the grounds of public and social views. However, I at no point stated that all arranged marriages are successful but some are in the same way some love marriages are.

I don't see marriage as a silly tradition though I see weddings as a silly tradition. I think marriage is just the public and legal pledge people make to committ to each other. I don't think it's so much religious as it is a way of grouping people together under the guise of religion.

Sophia Harris

reply

>"what is so normal about getting drunk and sleeping with random boys and reading horoscopes to decide who is right for you?"

Right, because that's the only alternative to arranged marriages and that's what everybody else does.

reply

I liked it - I thought it showed that love turns up on it's own, and that you can find happiness and stay true to traditions that have meanings for you.

What, abandoning everything that has meaning for you is the only option for anyone? Some people actually value their families and traditions, and want to keep them!

reply

Just wanted to say that while I don't especially believe in arranged marriages and myself married someone outside my own religion, I felt this little film was just trying to show that it doesn't have to be so bad after all. Each girl had pretty understanding parents who didn't seem to want to push them completely against their will (although the Orthodox Mom was a bit worse in this area). With the Muslim girl, you could see her instant attraction when she met the guy her parents invited to their home, and the same thing with the Orthodox girl spotting the guy in the library. This to me was not much different than spotting someone across the room at a bar, or going on a Dating Website. Look at how we are obsessed with watch The Bachelor or Bachelorette -- not much different than arrangeed marriages. Sometimes living within the confines of one's religious beliefs can be a comforting thing -- as having rules for behavior and traditions can actually make your life easier in some ways. I myself I feel that something is lost when women can't feel fulfilled without a career. While I do work now, the years I spent at home raising my two sons to be caring and productive people were the most meaningful of my life. So the movie is just showing a glimpse into how other people life. It's not saying YOU should live that way -- but just can't we each respect a different way of looking at things? JMHO :-)

reply

[deleted]

i'm sure that the families depicted in the movie really exist, there are probably many good, loving parents arranging the marriages of their sons and daughters, but does that make it alright?


I realize that that is a personal choice with the individual. There was a sequence with Leia, Rochel's cousin who had decided that the lifestyle was not for her. My question is, what happens when the arrangement doesn't work out? The spouse winds up being abusive, for example. Does the injured spouse just live out the rest of his/her life in misery? I have seen and heard about arranged marriages, and I have never heard of this happening, so I'm curious as to how it would work.

-The Divine Ms Slim

http://youtube.com/AndreJaxon

reply

In plenty of arranged marriage in other countries I've seen documentaries where they just have to deal with it. If you're getting slapped around. You still got to make it work.






Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.

reply

[deleted]

If the arranged marriage isn't working out, then what difference does it make from a non-arranged marriage not working out? If it doesn't work, simply don't continue with it.


Actually, I didn't think it was that simple. I thought that if the two agreed to be married, then the agreement had to be honored no matter what. As I said before, I am not familiar with the process of arranged marriages.

-The Divine Ms Slim

"I make him an offer he no refuse"

reply

It seems to me though, at least from this movie, that the women just choose from the guys that their family would approve of. I see nothing wrong with this at all.
What's wrong with marrying someone you know would fit in with your family?
And the thing with them marrying in their own religion - if you're religious this makes life much easier. It is easier to raise your children in your beliefs if you're spouse has the same beliefs as well. I would prefer to marry someone of the same religion as myself for this matter.

reply

divorce is allowed in many cases, surely for those who live in this country; a popular mid-eastern talk show with four women, e.g., includes a woman from Saudi Arabia that wears a head scarf, and is overall somewhat conservative, but is divorced.

Yesm there are abusive marriages. But, sadly, this is in no way limited to arranged marriages, right? The movie provides proof that it is important that women have some veto power, no matter how the marriage occurs.

reply

The movie provides proof that it is important that women have some veto power, no matter how the marriage occurs.


I think this is the part that most people take quarrel with. Women shouldn't have "some" veto power in this situation, any person should have 100% freedom in deciding who they want to get married to. It really shouldn't be a third party deciding who they should meet in order to find a husband, as if it was the ultimate goal of their existence. They way I feel about it was summed up by the Ukrainian Jew she met when they were displaying to final prospect for Rochell. He basically said the best purpose for a Jewish woman was to serve a Jewish man, and he'd give her the privilege of serving him. That to me is deplorable in this day and age, but ultimately to each his own.

On the topic of the film I thought it was well written, and well executed. I personally saw Nasira going through the marriage process at one point, but I thought Rochell was truly going to break through the cycle her family was determined to continue.

"Why cant I just hug a woman with my legs in friendship?" --Ellen Page

reply


It depends on how you look at it.

She did not agree to marry someone she did not want to marry. Thus, really, she DID have "100%" veto power.

OTOH, she had certain beliefs. Under those beliefs, there would not be total discretion. Therefore, if someone (by her free will) is part of a community where your faith requires you to marry within it, the person is "choosing" (and the film wasn't taking place somewhere the women realistically had no choice; where women just serve a Jewish man because they have no choice) to restrain their choices. This includes taking part in some sort of matchmaking system.

This is what I meant by "some."

reply

I'm not so sure, I guess it depends on how you analyze a story. Do you merely look at the dialogue and decide from the direct actions that, that is how the character feels? Or, do you delve deeper in to the story and read the subtext and try get a feel for the characters are actually going through?

I think the reason Rochel choose Gidian was because it was finally someone who she got to meet on her own, this is something that is completely alien to her. She found a taste of freedom in meeting a person without the caged feeling of her family surrounding her. Only when she was shown Gidian was a prospect through the "matchmaker" did she make a decision. I think if she really was interested in him as a person, it would have been more interesting to meet him, and introduce him to her family, as opposed to being shown that he was a prospect for marriage.

"Why cant I just hug a woman with my legs in friendship?" --Ellen Page

reply

This is a beautiful movie and an interesting response to what some ppl assume the lives of traditionally religious women are like. I found Rochel's situation especially complex as she really did battle between her family's wishes and what she wanted. Of course, the resolution to that problem came at a very convenient time in the film but that's what makes a story a story. Even if the script was a little simplistic, it's a unique film which demonstrates that there is more than one way to view feminism. There's not only the secular model but also the religious model where the woman freely chooses to live by her faith. And obviously, both Rochel and Nasira are happy with their choices by the end of the film.

reply

I don't question arranged marriages as such, but I do think that the message that everything will work out fine is overly optimistic. It does not always happen this way, and the film would have been better if it showed the other side of things when it does not work out.

reply

First, I am not sure exactly what the "terribly written" part is about. Do you not like the theme or do you think the writing is poor?

As to the tendency to oppose "arranged" marriages on this thread, this seems to come from people who didn't see the movie. As to Rochel, we basically had a sort of Jewish dating deal. I find it hard to believe that many people from various backgrounds don't find mates that way -- whatever it might be (including peer groups), they seek out some group they are comfortable with to match them up, they date the various possibilities, and find one.

Rochel, which would seem to be a good thing for some here, refuses to "settle." She respects her religious faith/tradition but will not settle. She meets someone she likes outside of the organized dating. Her friend in effect tricks the guy and the match-maker and helps the two to hook up. They like each other and get married. In effect, tradition is not so set in stone after all, we get wiggle it some to get a good ending. What a horrible message!

As to her friend, her father finds someone in the community, she doesn't like him, and he supports her choice. They continue looking, like many people of many nationalities, faiths etc. try to find a match inside their own communities, who they are comfortable with, and she finds someone she likes, in part because he seems to respect her job. Again, how horrible is that? I think we are dealing with people who don't want to admit that conservative religions aren't the only insular groups out there.

As to the ending, they are in the park with their kids. Unsure if that means they aren't working any more. Would they not have children? In fact, since they appear to be babies, they could very well be on leave.

reply

I don't like the way the theme is handled. It simplifies and condones an institution I believe to be old fashioned, counter productive and oppressive.

-"I find it hard to believe that many people from various backgrounds don't find mates that way"

I hope you're joking. Some old dried up woman is put in charge of finding a "suitable" partner, and you consider that normal? Well, if it is I find it incompatible with my moral beliefs to say the least.

-"In effect, tradition is not so set in stone after all, we get wiggle it some to get a good ending. What a horrible message!"

Wiggle? I understand that traditions, especially religious ones, die hard, but the fact that Rochelle's parents are tricked to believe, that her wishes are really theirs, does not make them right. This is a moral issue and I'm sure not all girls in this situation are as strong or have as cunning friends.

-"As to her friend, her father finds someone in the community, she doesn't like him, and he supports her choice"

How good of him. If my parents invited someone to dinner as a potential partner for me, I would be furious. Being a well trained muslim girl she is not furious, only terrified. The movie at least showed that.

As to the ending I already argued, that when they speak about how they are going to train their husbands, they are really confirming their inferior role in their respective marriages.



"All we need is a voluntary, free-spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction. Everybody just gotta keep *beep* everybody 'til they're all the same color." -Bullworth



reply

so many of you have talked in here and here's what I have to say:

Not everything you do believe in means everybody is wrong and what you believe in is the right thing. If you find this kind of marriage weird and wrong oh and "old fashioned" well how about other people find your way of marriage disgusting? or just against the laws of this world?

Not everything in the market is the new fashion and the right choice you make!
We've got a meat market nowadays and this meat market might not be meat market to some. Again, to me it is, to you it is "new fashion" do you understand where I am coming from. Great.

The Muslim girl got disgusted from that first potential partner because we all saw the mess he was in. He was not clean, not so faithful, not shy enough, and his hair was a mess. Well this is according to the Muslim girl anyways. Again, some people might find him attractive and handsome. Since she didn't then she is looking for a faithful one!! Someone who is a bit more handsome, bit more fearing to GOD... Hint Hint!! THEREFORE it wasn't the parents that wanted religion to come first in the equation rather it was the girl and her morals that disliked the situation!!
Same goes along with the Jewish girl. Her parents found her random guys to meet. What a great pleasure for someone to have having people come to meet you to see if you both are compatible. Marvelous, clean, respectful, pure, innocent, protective way of getting to know someone rather than going out for a beer, being dragged to his/her place, having sex all night long, wake up and go get married after knowing she is pregnant?? Nothing wrong with recommending a person you met or saw... But as long as you respect your parents enough that you at least ask them what they think of this person. You respect the moments you were carried in your mothers womb and the moments your father's sweat came down his cheeks to make you a living.

Again, some people might find this to be the alright way of getting married but I just wanted to show you how it looks from the other side of the rope.

Now you ask why religion? Why are all those men Muslims or Jewish that came forward to the girls? Well it is the girl's choice! How you say? well here it is: The Jewish girl's mother was participating and making the decisions about the religious nature of the man coming forward. Basically lets roll back to the time that she, the mother, was younger. Did she have a choice if she can marry other than a Jewish? No, well why the heck is she not letting her daughter choose then? Are you trying to tell me that ok ok when they were young they wanted to have a choice but couldn't and when they got older they wanted to have a choice for their daughters but couldn't?? That is not the case here. The mother and father knows about the rules. And as they grow older they believe in these rules more and more and try to teach these rules to their children as their children cannot for see that far ahead where the parents are. Therefore it is a good idea that the children be following their parents (not blindly though) but following them to a certain extent as they have seen far more and have better understand how things function. OH just to note that both the Jew family and the Muslim family have already sat with the children long time ago and have had a good conversation of why and why not you should or should not marry someone other than your faith! So it has come pretty common among the family to follow the foot steps of the RULES!

It is taught in the Towrat and in the Quran that this is what is lawful for you to marry and this is what is not. Period. These people are simply following the RULES! The same as the Ontario population follow the rules of marrying gays and lesbians, the Muslims and the Jews are also following the rules!!. I have no problem with that and in fact I envy their good practice and their obedience to their rules and to God. If, however, you have no rules to abide by then don't go pointing out fingers on those who have rules and say : "they are old fashioned". You pointing fingers at them is telling me that you are old fashioned.

More about choosing religious partners: I, for example, would not want to see my daughter go out with a person that doesn't have RULES sent down from God that I have taught her all through out these years. That person is not qualified according to the RULES to be a fair husband. He might cheat on her, he might disregard her, he might make her lose her faith, he might be a heavy drinker and get abusive, he might be swearing to God the one that she believes in, loves and lives for. For that, the RULES left no space where any man other than that of your faith can come near your daughters. You will have to live with these RULES as long as you are around people who believe in these RULES. If you happen to have a problem with that then hey there are lots of fish out there for ya that play their cards with out RULES or laws. All it costs you is a bottle of beer.
regardless if you think that this is fair or unfair, biased or false, you will have to go back to square one to the RULES and prove them wrong first before you prove the actions wrong.

Just a short respond to that person criticizing the "old dried up woman". This comes from a traditional point of view. Therefore, traditions and cultures need not be stoned in ones head and worshiped. They need to be updated (if they are to be followed anyways) every time the society has a need for it. For instance, during the Jewish girl's parents time, this "old dried up woman" did very well at matching people that not even a psychologist could do nowadays. However through out the years and with the lack of new experience rather the same old trick followed over and over, she becomes outdated compared to the newer generation out there. Yet she is still a match maker but needs some more newer skills to cope with the surrounding families and different needs! It is unfortunate in this movie to have showed this case however there are much more successful ways out there served by many Jewish communities and other religious people. But it would make sense for the movie maker to bring this as an extreme example to argue the extreme case scenario. Have we been intelligent enough to look around us, we would have realized this and showed more respect rather than jump to conclusions about that particular group of people.

Little bits about freedom of choice: When it is the LAW it is the LAW. There is no more choice over the LAW. Whether you like it or not this is the way it is. Do you have a choice whether you wanna pay the government half ya check through taxes or not? no you don't have a choice where as in Syria you do lets say for example. DOES THAT MEAN THAT THEY HAVE MORE FREEDOM OF CHOICE THAN YOU DO AS AN AMERICAN OR CANADIAN? Again when it is the LAW it is the LAW no questions asked. These are the true believers and true followers of the LAW or the books sent down from GOD. You can say they don't have freedom to show their bodies, to marry whoever religion person they want, but they can throw at ya the same argument that you don't have as much choice in other things as they do though.

I say, if you were talking about choice and how much choice is choice, keep it within your community and don't go out bashing others about their limits of choices. It is extremely difficult to compare one culture to another as non of us are sitting on fences and we all belong to communities and cultures of all sort of faith, race, ethnicity, tradition, or simply countries.


Done with that. My personal comments on the movie: It is sad sometimes when their is a lack of communications between one generation and another. I hope this movie serves as a reminder to all of us to have better communications with our children. It was shown that the Muslims in the movie had better communications than those of the Jewish family whereas that is not always the case. Sometimes it is the other way around but however this in the movie does happen every now and then and among all different kinds of communities with some communities suffer from it more than others. At any rate, what we need to understand is that there are cultures and traditions, and there are religions. We don't want to mis between them both! Some people follow traditions as if they are "the religion" and was inherited through out the years and some follow strictly the religion with no culture nor tradition involved. Not everything Muslims do nowadays is written in the books of Islam and same with the Jews. Therefore traditional and cultural societies does get in between people of faith and does introduce new behaviors and new attitudes. Those who stay firm in their beliefs don't get effected and those who take things loosely do.

One other note, what the Jewish girl did when she left the house was absolutely correct. Sometimes, you need to let you parents rethink things. Unfortunately, it has to be that she had to leave. In reality, a conversation should have changed their minds but apparently like I said before, the movie maker wanted to get the extreme case scenarios to the viewers which is alright as long as we understand where he is coming from.

Here I didn't see any arranged marriages? Arrange marriage is the marriage that is already arranged (hence arranged marriage) between two people without their consent. What we saw in this movie was not arranged marriage and that's why this movie is not called "the arranged marriage" or what not. Rather this movie is about arranging the marriage between these couples. As you all saw, the parents were striving to marry their daughters so their daughters can feel the pleasure of life as they saw it. It is a natural thing in parents to do when they have been married under the name of a Religion. They encourage marriage to one that is pure virgin like them rather than "sleeping around" with a hand full of unwanted diseases and lost identities here and there.
This fact might not be clear to the children but will be when their children grow up and learn from societies (Hence why the mothers would then repeat what they were taught and not flip flop but those mislead)

To those that don't like the idea of marriage as you might hate each other and prepare for battles later on throughout the marriage: there is always a sick option of divorce had things not gone right, even in the first few days, and shame on that society that points fingers at you when you divorce. As long as you are doing the right thing nothing else matters.

Lastly, how wonderful it is to marry someone that you are confident they are pure, clean, modest, respectful, virgin, virgin in their nature, honest, loyal, faithful and passionate.
And how miserable it is to marry otherwise !!

Cheers all,
Peace and blessing be upon ya all...

reply

I agree that what's right for me isn't necessarily right for others. I don't mind admitting that I'm not even sure what is right for me. But I'm convinced that a decision on who you choose as a partner should ultimately be yours. Seeking advice and council with your friends and relatives is probably a good idea, but the final decision is yours.

In the movie it seemed that both girls were much better qualified than their parents to find a good husband. In other cases it might be the other way around, but isn't it better that the one getting married makes unfortunate choices than the parents?

you come off as a well meaning person with sincere belief in love. also you come off as a very religious person with great respect for authorities. and that's exactly what this is about. as you said, i have to prove the rules wrong before the actions. i think the rule books of our three "mono" religions have been proven so flawed, that it would be ignorant to follow them blindly. laws and rules change, it is the only way for societies to evolve.


reply

"I hope you're joking. Some old dried up woman is put in charge of finding a 'suitable' partner, and you consider that normal? Well, if it is I find it incompatible with my moral beliefs to say the least."

Again, the women in the move don't just settle and robotically follow the path of the matchmakers. But, the crude use of "old dried up women" in this day of "Match.com" is distasteful. It is in effect a dating service of sorts, and many use them. You sneer at the wisdom of older women a bit much. Again, one way you find a match is inside your own community. BTW, turns out the "old dried up woman" had a good sense in the end of who would make her happy.

"Wiggle? I understand that traditions, especially religious ones, die hard, but the fact that Rochelle's parents are tricked to believe, that her wishes are really theirs, does not make them right. This is a moral issue and I'm sure not all girls in this situation are as strong or have as cunning friends."

Actually, if you look at many facially conservative institutions, ones that continue to thrive, they deep down have flexibility. Catholics, whose beliefs I disagree with overall, are a good example. The women in this movie probably are far from atypical in this regard.

"How good of him. If my parents invited someone to dinner as a potential partner for me, I would be furious. Being a well trained muslim girl she is not furious, only terrified. The movie at least showed that."

I didn't see that at all. She didn't look "terrified" to me. The idea that parents don't try to hook up their children today outside of religious communities seems to me to be absurd.

"As to the ending I already argued, that when they speak about how they are going to train their husbands, they are really confirming their inferior role in their respective marriages."

Women playfully say this all the time. If they are the ones doing the "training," btw, I'm unclear how this is "inferior."

The women here controlled their own fates throughout, including rejecting stereotypical views by the 'liberal' school official. I don't choose to accept their religious faiths in particular, but many do follow that path. How they did so while staying true to themselves was rather refreshing. Others not in stereotypically 'backward' traditions have a thing or to to learn from them.




reply