Utter utter crap


Such an awful movie. All the cliches you could ever wish - blonde snipers, bestial Chechens and Arabs. A new touch was African Americans (!) on the Chechen side.
Acting is horrible, dialogue stilted and unnatural, as though "..na" at the end of each sentence was to add authenticity. Music is meant to be dramatic, but makes everything look even more ridiculous.
It was interesting to see what Nevzorov had to offer since the days of "Nashi", but is seems he still is a raving lunatic, suitable only for propaganda purposes. Mental institution is crying out for him.

There, got it out of me. Sorry, watching such filth of a movie has its effects.

reply

"blonde snipers, bestial Chechens and Arabs. A new touch was African Americans (!) on the Chechen side".
So, why are you so surprised? It all happened. It all happened in real. This movie was done when the campain in chechniya was far from being over.

reply

No, he's right, "blonde snipers" is a myth ("Baltic female biathlon medalists", no less). Crucified soldiers is another one (and its origins are dating back from the Great War).

"It all" didn't happen. Fictional story, fictional events, fictional characters.

In 1998 "the campain in chechniya" actually was over (the war ended with a ceasefire in August 1996 and officially in January 1997).

reply

Well f@ck my old boots! Been there, seen it? The campaign in chechniya was more or less over on april 16th 2009. There were two of them, just in case:
1. Dec 11th 1994 - Aug 31st 1996
2. Sept 30th 1999 - April 16th 2009

reply

How do you define "campaign"? Anyway, by your own defintion there was no "campaign" there in 1998. This war was concluded by the official peace treaty (and not just ceasefire) quite some time before.

What officially ended "more or less over on april 16th 2009" was the "counter-terrorist operation in Chechnya" (just another Russian "mission accomplished"). The fighters (now mujahideen of Umarov) for some reason refused to acknowledge this too, and so hundreds of people died since then in the now-expanded North Caucaus conflict anyway (including the interior minister of Dagestan and almost the president of Ingushetia). So maybe next time send they should try and first send the muj a letter of notice or something.

reply

Lol who said they are african americans? african americans live in america, blacks living in other parts of the world arent african americans lmao . Those blacks who fight in chechnya are from middle east and africa not america ffs so call them just blacks or negroes or whateva suits you. "In total, approximately 80 Middle Eastern Arabs fought against the Russians during the 1994-96 war [1]. Alongside them were some North Africans and Turks". And what cliche are you talking about? Nothing is thought up. Some blacks really fight/fought on chechen side in chechnya, and blonde female snipers arent thought up either, there were indeed reports about blonde female snipers fighting on chechen side from baltic states in the first chechen war altough it hasn't been proven, or maybe it has now i don't know. So don't start bashing this film up so fast jeez.

reply

It sounded like the blacks were talking in English, maybe I was wrong. They sure did not look like Arabs. And as to female snipers from the Baltic states - p-uh-leeeeze... Myths, never proven. All this crap would be tolerable if the movie itself was well made, but there is simply not one redeeming feature about it.

reply

[deleted]

Ok it sounds like you were actually fighting there and saw every kind of enemy there was, p-uh-leeeze. I dont think you have any grounds to say what and what is not a myth, unless you were fighting there. The -na part, is, I believe, immitation of Gurza who is a Chechen War hero, and that is how he actually speaks. I recommend you watch documentary called Chechnya v ogne or Chechnya on fire (literal translation), there you will see those Estonian snipers (not women, i do believe the movie was just trying to make it more dramatic), you will even hear them being mentioned in the song, you will also see the blacks, you will see Gurza who adds -na, but he was probably acting, right, and you will see it is hell. Also i recommend documentary called Chechensky Kapkan (Chechen trap) and Po Tu Storonu Voini (the other side of the war), but they are in Russian, i dont know if you speak it. There you will see the things you called a myth. But i guess you going to dismiss those documentaries as fakes, right?
Edit: If you watch Chechen trap you will actually see the women fighters.

reply

So, you say MALE "Baltic snipers" run around in "white tights"?

- on 14 January a report noted a female unit from the Baltics, the so-called white tights, is in Chechnya. They get $1000 per day plus $1500 for each Russian officer they kill. (ITAR-TASS, 14 January 1995, as reported in FBIS-SOV-95-010, 17 January 1995, p 28.)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1995/chechpt3.htm

Several Russian sources have fanciful reports about thousands of muhajeddins from Afghanistan and female snipers in white tights from the Baltic countries. In fact there were relatively few mujaheddins in Chechnya and no western journalist ever saw any of the amazons from the Baltic states.
http://www.caucasus.dk/publication1.htm

To explain the debacle, Russian propaganda has paraded a far-fetched collection of bloodthirsty foreign mischief-makers, including Afghan mujahedin, Ukrainian fascists, Islamic fanatics, Chechen migrants from Jordan and, in a crude flourish that smacks of sexually frustrated barrack-room fantasy, female snipers from the Baltics in white tights.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19950311/ai_n13970807

Less credible were reports from Russian military sources regarding Ukrainian women fighting in the Chechen front line. Soon after the second Chechen war began in 1999 Russian accounts began to provide details of a Ukrainian unit of ski-borne women athletes/snipers fighting on the Chechen side. Known as “the White Tights,” these elusive fighters were at other times described as Latvians or Estonians. This bit of battlefield mythology was a survival from the 1994-1996 Chechen war.
http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=416&issue_id=3672&article_id=2370937

When the war in Chechnya soured overnight, the Russian leadership was aghast at losing to a non-white subject people. So President Boris Yeltsin & Co. started barking shrilly about 10-foot-tall foreign mercenaries -- about female Estonian snipers in white tights, all manner of silliness.
http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/7128-15.cfm

And so on. Oh wait, I know... the "white tights" were added to "make it more dramatic" :)

Also, who the heck is this "Gurza" the geroy?

reply

"non-white subject people"

Chechens are as white as most Russians, they just happen to be muslim. Race and creed are two different things. Next youll be saying that my Migrelian family (who are blonde/fair) are not white because they are Georgian.

reply

Not me. It's racial theories of Matt Bivens from The Moscow Times/The Nation ;)

Nationalist Russians call Caucasian "blacks", too.

reply

Regarding crucifixion of russian soldiers you should watch this vid: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UtWstdFn-Q4. Soldier saw it by his own eyes three soldiers crucified near destroyed BMP machine. He is talking about second chechen war. If it happened in Second war why not to happen in First war?

Gurza is a nickname of the real spetznaz soldier. His squad chechens called "Mad squad" because they could not catch it.

So don't talk about what you don't know.

reply

"Soldier is talking".

Yeah, I'm totally convinced.

I read a lot about this war, including several books, never heard about any "Gurza". Do this mythical figure even has a name? Because I just specifically searched for "Gurza" in the Chechen context, and all I found was a Russian 9mm handgun.

reply

If you dont see it, that means it doesnt exist? A bit childish dont you think, and with everything WE DID see on chechen tapes, why its so hard to believe? I dont trust Russian newspapers either, and I dont think anyone does. I prefer watching documentaries with independent sources, not big tv stations in Russia since those are just like to do propaganda. I believe the soldiers in those documentaries, I just do not see a reason for them to lie. Here is a doc zabiti polk (forgotten battalion) with Gurza and Kobra talking about the Russian soldiers on the cross http://nordsky.msk.ru/indx2.php?id=18 and . It is of course in Russian so you can just dismiss it as Russian propaganda and move on. His real name is Aleksei Efent'ev (алексей ефентьев)http://www.redstar.ru/2006/10/24_10/2_02.html. He is of course a bit mythical. http://zavtra.ru/cgi/veil/data/zavtra/03/511/42.html here is an interview with him and here is a bit of just data on him http://www.spec-naz.org/forum//index.php?s=34ff0283f706e8151156fa341d459df0&showtopic=5824&pid=45875&st=0&#entry45875 , sorry it is all in Russian. He was supposed to be given a hero;s medal but because the first war embarrassing, he never received it, some people would rather forget it, that is why you dont hear much about him.
Hmm edit: I cannot write his name in Russian here as it comes up as gibberish, but if you follow the link you'll see the name and you can search on it.

reply

Yeah, I don't believe such stories. Why? Well, I'll give you an example of such myth in the English-language, via the guy called Arkady Babchenko:

"Chechnya cost thousands of lives on both sides. Horror was everywhere. Round the main square of one village were large crosses upon which Russian soldiers had been crucified and castrated. In retaliation Russian troops herded all the men they could find into the square, threw them down in piles and hacked at them. In half a day the whole village was castrated, then the battalion moved out. "

This is all very interesting, this anonymous "village" being castrated. Only I never heard about it (and I've read quite a bit). Did you? Thought so.

I'd like to see a photography or a video of such crucifiction and/or castration (so much obsession with another man's genitalia), as there were apparently plenty. There's none? Oh, shoot. What a pity. Maybe at least some of the "White Tights"? You know, those Baltic sniper amazons? Damn.

And the guy repeating again in another western article (and it's all mass-media, The Telegraph now):

"On another, his battalion enters a village where the main square is planted with large crosses upon which Russian soldiers have been crucified. 'They have been nailed up by their hands and each has a few bullet holes in his chest. They've all been castrated,' Babchenko writes. The Russians respond by rounding up all the local Chechen men and in half a day the whole village has been castrated. "

Yawn. But at least now you see how this little things called "self-promotion" and "myth-creation" work (the new myth is born: "castrated village" - it was in the press so it must be true).

reply

[deleted]

There were American mujahideen fighting for Chechnya and the cliche here in North America is that every Black man who goes to jail will convert to Islam. Put to two together and you get Black Americans fighting Russians.

I agree this movie is horrible though.

reply

A mujahid rather than mujahideen, as there was only one such guy. (Not black.)

Btw, the Russians more recently "have seen" them "black American mercenaries" (as well as from all over the world) fighting for the Georgians: http://rt.com/Top_News/2008-08-10/Did_mercenaries_help_Georgia.html

They even, uh-oh, "captured one" such "negro"! http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2008/08/american-soldiercitizen-cap tured-in.html (don't hold your breath for any follow-up of this story)

Btw, the Americans are not much better - they don't fight (black or whie) Russians everywhere, but for some reason they fight "Chechens" everywhere, instead.

Even as they have captured several Russian citiziens in Afghanistan (really captured, unlike this "negro" in the Russian tall story - http://www.hrw.org/en/node/10989/section/1 for their story), but no Chechens among them - http://easterncampaign.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/imaginary-chechens-att ack/ (and in fact there is zero photos/vidoes/interviews/any proof at all of any actual Chechen in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, or other Somalia).

reply

It was supposed to be a propaganda movie, so don't be so harsh. It was made for people who ALREADY believe "it's based on facts".

Fckuing Nevzorov deserves a baseball bat to his kneecap for doing this movie and releasing it into Russian media. Once again Baltic states are shown as terrorist supporters.

IMDB should consider labeling this "movie" correctly.

reply