MovieChat Forums > Out of the Blue (2006) Discussion > What the hell is this turkey?!

What the hell is this turkey?!



wtf?! 8.5?! this is a load of crap! It feels like a bad "ripped off the headlines" US TV movie!
Unless you're a Kiwi with a morbid curiosity about this story that apparently made the news in NZ, stay away from this turkey... it's horribly badly directed, written and acted...

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

No it isn't, get off ya high horse! Do you only watch hollywood movies or something?? Go hire out some good festival films and stop watching only popcorn fodder.
Although I agree that an 8.5 is a little steep for what's on offer Out of the Blue is a very well made independent picture aimed for a specifically kiwi audience. Obviously they had a way smaller budget than a US produced endeavour and every cent can be seen up there on the screen. It's written relatively well and directed very capably considering the delicate subject matter for some, and ok, some acting was a bit off, I'll give you that, but it never threw me out of the movie.
I watched this the following night from viewing the latest Pirates of the Caribbean film with its plethora of eye candy actors and special effects and multi-million dollars thrown at it and thought this little local film was way more enthralling and will resonate with me far longer than that bloated blockbuster ever will. The sad thing is I wasted $15 on seeing Pirates at the theatre and saw this free on video at a mates house, I wish it had been the other way around.

reply

lmao... I just adore people who tell others to get off their high horses while looking down on them.

For your information, no I don't watch Hollywood movies, in fact unlike you, I haven't seen Pirates of the Caribbean or other highly publicized special effects junk movies like Harry Potter nor do I intend to. I'm repelled by most of what comes out of the junk factory these days and I mostly watch US indies, Brit, Aussie and European movies, which is how I ended up watching this crap thank you very much so why don't you get off YOUR high horse!

Being a low budget movie doesn't necessarily mean being a bad movie but it doesn't mean it has to be GREAT either. That certainly won't buy special effects but the some of the very best movies ever made were filmed long before we even knew what "special effect" mean so I don't give a damn.

What I am saying is that there are a LOT of movies that are made with as little or even less money out of Sundance, Toronto, Tribeca or Berlin festivals, and that are well thought of, have a decent plot and SOME dialogs, some characters, good acting and a general idea of direction, whether it is a sense of drama or tension or whatever needs to be illustrated and that's not the case of Out of the Blue. In fact, two of the best movies I have seen this year, Hard Candy and Strings, have been made for less than that and were both beautifully crafted

You ARE right though when you say it is "aimed for a specifically kiwi audience"... it's nothing but a sensationalist flick aimed at cashing in on a traumatic local experience.

I'm sorry you're upset because I criticized it but that doesn't give you the right to assume I'm a low level popcorn munching MTV viewer. At least I have SEEN Out of the Blue before I criticized it. You know nothing of me or my tastes so please refrain from attacking me.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

I just don't agree with ya sorry and when you attack or come out with such strong statements against a film expect to be challenged or at least get into a debate about it.
I feel the production tried hard not to be sensationalist or pandering to its audience as you have come off feeling and seemed to have done its research abuot the whole affair. I already agreed to an extent about some of your misgivings, an 8.5 rating is ridiculous and the old lady's acting whilst being shot at was pretty laughable, however overall I wouldn't start telling other people the film is outright "crap" or "a turkey." My opinion is this film has far more redeeming qualities than it does bad aspects and was a worthwhile watch. I guess, I do still go watch popcorn fodder and as such see some films I would term as a really true waste of money or people's time - such as Bad Boys II or Dead or Alive. I just cannot see Out of the Blue falling into that same class of truly bad film. But everyone's different, aren't they?
You are right about one thing, I did assume you weren't a big follower of the independents which I was totally wrong about so for that, I apologize. Sorry about that.

reply

You shouldn't have to apologize matt, look at this guy; "that apparently made the news in NZ". I think your extremly ignorant. David Gray caused mayhem in a small country town murdering a total of 13 people and all you have to say is "a story that apparently made the news"?! To this day it remains the worst mass murder in New Zealand history. Yeah I know we're a small country and up in th old U.S of A I'm sure there's been much worse stories. But there is no need to show such disrespect to the people that were involved in the real thing.

reply

I watched this the following night from viewing the latest Pirates of the Caribbean film with its plethora of eye candy actors and special effects and multi-million dollars thrown at it and thought this little local film was way more enthralling and will resonate with me far longer than that bloated blockbuster ever will. The sad thing is I wasted $15 on seeing Pirates at the theatre and saw this free on video at a mates house, I wish it had been the other way around.

Well said. POTC is a piece of flashy garbage.

reply

I just watched this movie, and I thought it was near perfect! The writing, the acting, all of it! I feel that perhaps those who didn't like it so much maybe misinterpreted the simplicity of certain aspects of the film, as cheap. Whereas I think the simplicity is what actually makes the movie so intense! However, I also respect that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and I mean no offense to those who didn't like it. :O)

Karl Urban was absolutely wonderful in this piece of art. The scenes with the little girl and his breakdown were absolutely heartbreaking! As a US citizen, I am truly saddened not only by this horrific event, but that this is the first of my hearing about it. Now, I was 2 when this happened so obviously I was too young to remember anything at that point. But it's still just so sad how much we (and I don't mean the US, I mean everyone in general) sometimes forget about what goes on in other countries. My heart goes out to those who lost loved ones, and all of NZ for this tragic time. I will certainly be telling everyone to watch this movie...it was too good!


"Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime isn't enough for music." -S. Rachmaninoff

reply

I have to agree with you, whilst this film is a harrowing story the acting and direction are terrible. This is like a poor made for tv movie. No way is this movie ever 8/10 when you consider some of classic films that have lower rating.

reply

"No way is this movie ever 8/10"

But Alan it IS 8/10, voted that way by your peers. I would opine then that it is your critical appraisal that is of doubtful quality.




"The King wore enough clothes for both of us." Mohandes Ghandi

reply

Can't say I'm qualified to judge the craft of the film etc, but personally I found it to be an enthralling and suspenseful story.
As a NZer we are relatively sheltered from this sort of thing. Perhaps if you were a local you would understand more of how the film evoked a reaction.
In terms of the acting, once again I felt it was very realistic. The entire incident is very shocking for such a hemmed in society. If the old lady doesn't react in a way that one would expect, perhaps it is because she wasn't meant to. We must remember that the audience is more informed than the characters. A little old lady in nz would not expect to be caught in gunfire. I am sure that a real person would not take the time to assume the appropriate facial expression of shock that could be deemed acceptable by an audience. Perhaps I exxagerate slightly, but part of this films charm is how awkward the characters are in their situation (to put it lightly)
Part of the films interest is that it is filmed almost as if one were observing the incidents (excluding the blur shots, which personally I found slightly excessive), in particular the first shooting scene which is not broken up by an abundance of close ups, looks of horror etc. I felt watching the film that the direction allowed the incidents to speak for themselves rather than manipulating a particular reaction (though obviously with this sort of subject matter there will be some of that going on). As I've said previously for an nz audience this is difficult to watch. The scenes of childrem having free reign around the streets, the long stretches of road to the next populated area are somewhat of a familiarity.
Finally, just because this sort of thing happens 'all the time' it does not make it any less shocking. Can we say desensitisation (I think I'm being a bit liberal with my english here but oh well) anyone?
End of the day, that's the rating it had so some people MUST agree with me

reply

Hmmmm....so easy to criticise the original poster, who clearly doesn´t get the film...

but then, everyone is entitled to their opinion I guess...

but some things need to be clarified...the acting in the film is good...some of it excellent (e.g. Matt Sutherland who plays the killer David Gray with very few words, and yet conveys a sense of dread, mania, fear and even evokes a small measure of sympathy, i.e. a complex portrayal of a 3D character)...

the screenplay is also good...and the production evokes a sense of place, with old'fashioned slow buildup, ´unravelling´ pacing...

It is a very good film, and deserves a high rating on IMDB. The fact other good films are rated lower does not diminish this one...

reply

Unless you're a Kiwi with a morbid curiosity about this story
Or if you think that a disturbed gunman killing thirteen of his friends and neighbours is an important event that should be remembered...

that apparently made the news in NZ
As opposed to Columbine High, where the exact same number of people were killed, yet it made headlines all over the western world. Why is that, do you think?

What I am saying is that there are a LOT of movies that are made with as little or even less money out of Sundance, Toronto, Tribeca or Berlin festivals, and that are well thought of, have a decent plot and SOME dialogs, some characters, good acting and a general idea of direction, whether it is a sense of drama or tension or whatever needs to be illustrated and that's not the case of Out of the Blue.
The point of the film was to chronicle events more or less as they happened, not to make an exciting drama/thriller. I say "more or less" because, due to the necessities of filmmaking, some of the specific details were compressed or moved around (Chris Cole was rescued before the Percy kids, it wasn't actually Nick Harvey who found Vanessa Percy lying in the road, etc) but for the most part it's a pretty accurate record of events and a lot of effort went into making it so. It's not a "plot", it's a true story. They're not "characters", they're real people, most of whom are still alive today.

reply

Oh *beep* off! this film was brilliantly made and beautifully acted! this looks like a case of some prat having no idea what theyre talking baout, and no i dont give a *beep* about different people having different opinions- this film was brilliant.

My body is broken

reply

Ithilfaen you're an idiot, you pretty much disrespected not only this great movie but also everyone that was apart of the murders in Aromoana..Just go back to watching "Fast and the Furious" or "Stomp the Yard".

reply

Doesn't look like many people respect your opinion Ithilfaen. Maybe you shouldn't have written it in such a bigotted fashion.

Personally, I thought the film was more intense than a lot of other things i've seen lately, and I watch a lot of things - from popular films to little known low budget films, film noir, music documentaries, etc etc.

And i'd definatly say that this was a film aiming for intellectual rather than entertainment purposes.



**purdy teefs** :B

reply

It was a fantastic movie; well directed, written and acted. Accurate to the true story from what I have read. You are the load of crap, not the movie. I enjoyed it, and am not a Kiwi with a morbid sense of curiosity, you turkey. Gobble gobble..

reply

I'm just after watching this. I'm sorry to sound cruel but I couldn't help but laugh all through this....It is a terrible film.

reply

Because...?

reply

cathall234 you laughed through this movie?

how callous can one get?

this really happened in my country (NZ) and people were killed, children, mothers, fathers all killed for no good reason

and you laugh in the face of it

you know even if the movie wasn't up to your "standards" you should show respect for the deceased, the survivors and the heros

i don't think your sorry to sound cruel or you wouldn't have said such an awful thing

imagine if this happened in your neighbourhood and someone said they laughed about it

reply

Don't be ridiculous. This is a film, not actual footage. The people getting shot are actors (and bad ones at that).
The true story itself is tragic and sad, but the film doesn't attempt to do anything except show a crazy person on a rampage... there is nothing else to this film. What is the point of this film? Why was it made? It serves no purpose... It is cheap and crappy, and when acting and direction is that bad then one can't help but laugh.

reply

i know its not real footage, but the people getting shot (actors) are playing real people who were murdered so think about that

but im not going to argue about it with you

this happened in my country and to my people so maybe i see more from this movie, and i think it was beautifully made

its not meant to be a hollywood type blockbuster or oscar winner

take from it what you want

reply

"It feels like a bad "ripped off the headlines" US TV movie!"

its not
it really happened, im from NZ and while i was very young when this happened i remember the news footage and how shocked and upset not to mention terrified my country was so show some respect

"Unless you're a Kiwi with a morbid curiosity about this story that apparently made the news in NZ"

morbid curiosity? excuse us all for wanting to asee a film about something in NZ history

as for apparently making the news what an ignorant comment you make

how about you look up the heroes that came from this awful day and see how they feel about you dismissing what happened

it might not have got the coverage that columbine got but it was just as devastating

a very sad day in NZ history and here you are dismissing it as if it means nothing, do you do this because NZ is such a small country? do you find us insignificant? do our tragedies mean nothing?

it might not have been the best film but i thought it was well done and true to the events

reply

anyone who could laugh all the way through this movie is just *beep* weird!

My body is broken

reply


I solely agree with you,
As for the bad acting , what film or programme have you acted in
lately?
My daughter played a surviving 4 year old in this movie and for you
to say that she is infact a bad actress, is a hit below the belt.
Have you read all the reviews in the listener , or the onfilm
magazine? or is reading difficult for you????

wake up

reply