Arn advising Saladin


Such interesting people these white people are.

They massacred half of the world. Each time they only received humane treatment back from the rest of the world. Because, obviously", rest of the world is not "white".

But, in this movie, we "learn" that -for example- Saladin was an honest, righteous, samaritan and merciful man just because a white man advised him to be so!

An invader, a murderer, a person who joins the bloodthirsty army of red seeing clergy, a white man.... Advising, instructing, giving a lecture to Saladin: how to be merciful and bring peace.

You white people... You will never change.


*******************
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=15227539

reply

You're ignorant and racist.

Both sides fought for a multitude of reasons which had nothing to do with religion. If I have to explain this to you, you're obviously too foolish or brainwashed to understand why.

You also missed the point of those scenes. The point was that their religion and ideology were more similar than they were different. If you saw a "white man" (please don't call us Caucasians that, it makes you sound like you don't know the proper terminology - which would further your terrible argument) lecturing a "brown man," then you're just looking for am excuse to hate someone slightly different than you. Practice what you preach, you pious man you.

reply

The ignorance your statements demonstrate speak louder than any counterpoint I could raise. You're pathetic.

reply

The author behind these books, Jan Guillou, loves Islam for some reason. So this was only expected. At least they kept it realistic enough, that even though Saladin spared Arn's life, he didn't spare anyone else's.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

You should be gtrateful that they did not cast some scandinavian actor to play Saladin.

I think they should have cast a pale white Swede in that part - just to grind the dagger deeper in the racist minds.

reply

No one has murdered more people on this earth than the followers of islam.
There may have been 3 crusades, but there has been 700+ jihads on the western world.

reply

Coming from someone whose nick is "kingifthebloodsea". But, who the *beep* are you kidding?! The muslims caused the most bloodshed in history? Better crack down those history books again, cause no nations caused as much death and destruction as the christians did. In the continents of Europe, the americas, africa, Asia, Australia. No matter where they landed, the caused genocides. Sure, muslim armies ruled once in Europe, but they didn't eradicate the people.

So, better study the right history again and leave those history stories made up by so called historians from the white race.

reply

such interesting people these turkish muslims are. That they image islam invented peace, invented equal treatment of women by letting them inherit, or invented letting other religions live in your empire without disturbing them.

You did NOT!

reply

At those times, even the muslims were much more civil and peacefull than those christian wild barbarians of europe.

reply

"At those times, even the muslims were much more civil and peacefull than those christian wild barbarians of europe."
Oh yeah?

https://i.imgur.com/0kyN965.jpg

reply

I would like to think that such vacuous generalizations and uninformed comments are simply the work of a pitiful troll between fapping in mom's basement. If, however, these pathetic utterances are really the product of your lack of intellect you are beneath contempt and should be pitied like those unfortunates who lick store windows.

reply

"A pitiful troll[...]fapping in mom's basement.[...]You[...]should be pitied like those unfortunates who lick store windows."

Can I please have your permission to re-use this?

reply

You used some liberal Hollywood style of film to0 expect a serious look into the Crusades and that of Saladin? Are truly nuts. Saladin was a bloody murderer who used far politics as a way to placate his enemies while stealing their land from them.

If the knights had not been so stupid as to allow themselves to be goard into a battle at Hattan where there was no water and ravaged with disease, Saladin would not have been able to keep his army together for long and had to retreat leaving the Second Crusade as being being victorious. The premature death of the king removed a temperance upon the army and they were stupid enough to march into the blazing desert with now supplies, disease and no water. Thais was Saladin's greatest moment and it only happened because of the importance of the Crusaders.

Staying near two cities were have been brilliant and Saladin would never had chanced advancing of Jerusalem. The attack on Hattin which is universally condemned should never have happened. And while Saladin was a polie guest, the decapitation f combantants and innocents rests sole on his disgraceful actions. If the Crusaders has listened to the Byzantine Empire the crusader states would have lasted but these "knights" were so perverted in their quests that by the 4 Crusade, all pretents of was against Islam was dropped in favored of attacking the greatest city of its; time, Constantinople and destroyed the glorious power of the Byzantine Empire. That these disgusting hell-bent Crusaders are paying for their crimes in hell as we speak for the horrors they committed against a follow Christian nation that had for 1,000 years protected the West from land and sea invasion for the East. This was their thanks.

So, yes, Saladin was vermin and his Islamic troops were blood thuristy murderers and rapists who destroyed the great culture and historical heritage of the Eastern Roam Empire. What a truely great shame.

reply

I hope English is not your native language, because your ability to express yourself is as garbled and confused as what you are trying to express.

reply