Why do you keep asking this...

Longer than what you twoofers say it was.
nope, 10.5 second for the south tower, 12.4 to 14.5 for the north and 6.5 for WTC7

Hit by WTC 1
no, a smallish section hit the south side and that doesnt change the SEMETRICAL falling

Not there.
yes it was, thermite found in the dust and evidence of it was caught on video

Doubtful, and Pakistan has enough people who are willing to break off from Government agencies to fund the Taliban and Al-Qaida.
transfer made on 9/10 confirmed by FBI (i'm amazed at how little of this stuff you know)

Most warnings about potential attacks were vague and non-specific.
wrong again, “involving hijacked planes over new york in september” is not “non-specific” (and 11 countries warning you should tell you things are real)

Never in one place at once.
wrong not only did hijackers live together, Atta and his friend lived in the playground of U.S intelligence

Not as poor as you fanatics insist they were.
no fanatics, no piloting skills, hanjour couldnt handle a 4 man plane and you think he carried out the near impossible maneuver to hit the pentagon

Which doesn't prove any alleged conspiracy.
wrong again, impact zone shows a plane couldnt have struck the pentagon (and you forget that the official story itself is an alleged conspiracy

The sounds were said to be LIKE explosives, but were not bombs.
no they were said to BE explosions, firemen saw and experienced them as well as got hit and blown back by them (which is why they banned the release of all the firefighters radio communications that day for 2-years)

On and off throughout the year.
and yet put options spiked to more than 1,100% more activity in the week before 9/11 ONLY on the companies in the towers and airlines affected that day

Not real!
yes real, Scott Forbes was there as were many others who reported the power-downs (which is how it got out in the first place)
And during one of those imaginary "power downs," somebody was able to buy a ticket to the Windows on the World Restaurant.
what the hell are you on about now? Explain yourself

You see, Clown, you people DO toss out all the evidence that doesn't fit your conclusions.
no, again you are wrong and mistake your own actions for ours

IMDB Trolls http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMEe7JqBgvg&NR=1

--Oh, yes...NOW I see the distiction You criticized people for suckering in to what the TV says, but you learned about the 9-11 conspiracy theory from your computer, which is simply another flickering screen that has the potential to feed you full of rubbish). You're too funny, mate, and too ironic to be real.

first off if you're gonna reply to me at least hit REPLY in my comment so I can reply to your reply (unless you're afraid)

--Oh, yes...NOW I see the distiction You criticized people for suckering in to what the TV says, but you learned about the 9-11 conspiracy theory from your computer, which is simply another flickering screen that has the potential to feed you full of rubbish). You're too funny, mate, and too ironic to be real.
silly billy thinking everything he sees on TV is real and they always investigate ever angle, now THAT'S funny

--Again, this thought of yours is simply jaw-dropping, sir. For the record, here is a link that explains the basics of the scientific method http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/overview_scientifi c_method2.gif Pretty interesting, huh? Oh, don't mention it...you're more thant welcome
great, another idiot who starts off asking questions but just ends up talking crap, I know the scientific methods, and no, those of the commission dont stand up

The 9-11 commission did NOT conduct science,
agreed (and yet you think its a bullet proof argument

and they never claimed to...they simply took the evidence from thousands of lines and tried to compile them into a coherent narrative of what happened that day.
no they took what was reported and put it into what they thought a plausible story


The members of the commission were politicians, not scientists.
I know (give me something new)

Also, the media never conducts science, and never claims to...they are not scientists. (In case you were wondering, the people in the media are called JOURNALISTS).
yes, and as JOURNALISTS they are supposed to INVESTIGATE, not just take the word of people (thats called being DOING YOUR JOB)

Their job is to report (on scientific findings, or whatever), not to conduct science.
no their job is to FIND OUT things THEN report them and in this case they just believed what they were told WITHOUT investigation

Since the 9-11 Commission and the media are not scientists, you are setting up a straw man argument when you criticize them for not using the scientific method to reach their conclusions. I bet you actually believed (until just now) that you knew what the scientific method was and who actually applies it.
Hahaha, no no , YOURS is the strawman argument, we present the OTHER facts that the media ignored, we present no theory only facts, you just cant handle them because 9/11 has become like a religion to you that must not be challenged

--Come on...really? So now you've proven yourself to be Master of Irony AND a probable liar. Bravo, good sir...bra-VO!
Hahaha, you've not proved anything other than you know nothing

As I clearly pointed out, the inside job folks are doing the exact reverse of the scientific method.
carrying out experiments to get to the bottom of how it all happened (the opposite of what NIST did) is the OPPOSITE of scientific method? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH …........ HAHAHAHAHAHAH....... Hahahah …. haha …. ha .. ha. Great stuff

The collapse of the World Trade Center is easily the most scientifically studied single event we've had in decades (and possible in the history of our country).
Agreed

Thousands of scientists from many scientific areas studied every facet of this event using the scientific method, and the vast majority came to conclusions very close to what the "Official Version" is.
Wrong (and the opposite which you choose to ignore)

Their was a solid convergence of science and evidence that pointed in a specific direction
not true all reports STOP at the point of “collapse” (try reading something)

(the Inside Job people can't even get their story straight--if you look at/watch/read a dozen Inside Job web sites/movies/books, they all have vastly different ideas about what "9-11 was an inside job" means).
not true, “Inside Job” means it was the elements of the U.S intelligence and people in government acting with Mossad and MI6 to create a reason for war (and even if this wasnt the case … which it is …... that wouldnt change the FACT that the official story doesnt stand up and its so easy to see that they would have spotted it and so to say something ELSE happened is to cover up what DID happen and you'd do that WHY if you didnt have to to save your own ass?

These thousands of scientists obviously know how to conduct science;
as do “our” scientists, only difference is “ours” dont have to look for stuff that can be used to re-enforce the official story in some way to get funding

your post shows that you obviously have either no idea of what the scientific method really is,
Ha, you'll have to do better than that

or you have no idea about the history/process of how the Inside Job movement gathered its data and reached its conclusions.
started when SCIENTISTS were troubled by the events and carried out their own experiments (being as an investigation was BLOCKED for so long) and impossibilities started to arise

Whatever it is they are doing, The Inside Job movement is certainly not conducting science (or legitimate philosophy, for that matter)
hahaha except for all the SCIENCE that has been put out of course

...this is painfully obvious to real scientists,
apparently you arent aware that the movement has hundreds of scientists itself (as well as architects and engineers)

and is obvious to anyone who took an into science class as a kid.
yes it is and yet you STILL dont grasp anything about the events, maybe in your next post you could actually focus on an event instead of random nothingness

Come on, kid...you must have see Bill Nye the Science Guy at least once!
sorry kid, from the U.K

IMDB Trolls http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMEe7JqBgvg&NR=1