Ok, can anyone debunk the reasons listed in this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2UD0YsF6JE
thanks for that....
'He who takes things out of the Earth invites disaster'..Hopi saying
[deleted]
so you were impressed by
numbers 5 (odigo warning), 7,8, 12,
but...
number 9(flight 77s long flight time sans interception) is correct..as is 10;
number 11 on muslims fundamentalists is correct...interesting huh! Why expose themselves so publically before a well planned terror attack?
'He who takes things out of the Earth invites disaster'..Hopi saying
[deleted]
you also liked 12, 14,15, 16, 17,21-28, 33-35
13 is correct..some hijackers turned up alive after 9-11
the hijackers were weedy and armed only with box cutters...
19 is correct, 20 is embarrassing(to you and the US authorities)
29 verifiably true...wtc7, had very few fires in it, and little damage, yet it collapsed.Even the 9-11 Commission couldnt explain it.
30 is atrue claim...few fires in wtc7...its easily verifiable
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
now i see only a few fires....
meanwhile note this:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
now THOSE are fires!
39..molten metal can be seen flowing...investigted by Dr Steven Jones
'He who takes things out of the Earth invites disaster'..Hopi saying
some hijackers turned up alive after 9-11
Nope. No hijacker turned up as alive.
..molten metal can be seen flowing...investigted by Dr Steven Jones
Sure, it might be metal. So what? And Steven Jones is not an engineer, he's a physicist specializing in cold fusion. He's outside his realm of expertise.
And just because I'm not commenting on the rest doesn't mean I agree with you, dude. The rest is just slightly more ludicrous than I have time for.
fire proofing is simply for insurance purposes only...fire can't melt steel -Uglytheclown
you like 42-45, 47-50
51 is accurate..the air traffic controllers were at Dulles airport...
53...which senior flight instructor?
videos were seized and for years not shown to anyone...if they showed proof of the official conspicary theory, theyd have been blasted on the TV 24/7
yes, you couldnt sit thru an agony of evidence that crushes the lies of the official conspirators and the hopes of the gullible
'He who takes things out of the Earth invites disaster'..Hopi saying
briansouter, when did knight say he liked any of those points?
ideos were seized and for years not shown to anyone...if they showed proof of the official conspicary theory, theyd have been blasted on the TV 24/7
And if they showed nothing, they wouldn't be.
fire proofing is simply for insurance purposes only...fire can't melt steel -Uglytheclown
because americans are brainwashed by the media and will believe whatever is fed to them...i don't think 9/11 was completely an inside job, but i do believe that the government is withholding valuable info...and the fact that all of these "key witnesses" have mysteriously turned up dead is kinda creepy to me.
"yeah...they said that would happen in health class"
Key witnesses turn up dead, but not Dylan Avery himself? Why didn't the government kill Dylan Avery to keep Loose Change from getting out? If they had the power to secretly assassinate people like that, why not one more guy to keep this "documentary" from getting out?
share