A few things that made it hard for me to sympathise with Meg.
This film was truly disturbing and in posting this I am in no way absolving the guilt and blame on the boys who were also victims of Ruth, a woman.
Having said that there were certain aspects of Meg's character that made it hard for me to sympathise with her, although of course I did sympathise with her to an extent. Nobody should have to go through that, it's sickening.
1. Why did she flirt with younger boys? This was probably the most disturbing part of the movie for me. Meg seemed to be subtly flirting with David (a much younger boy). I don't know why this is being overlooked. I cringed when she gave that painting to him, and the way she was laughing with him. It seemed to suggest there were motives. Perhaps this is what Ruth was getting at when she said there were bad things Meg had done that she wanted her to confess to?
2. Considering it was the 50's, Meg's dress seemed too provocative. Why on earth was she running around in shorts that barely covered her bottom? Especially around young and impressionable boys, this is one thing that made me feel a little uncomfortable with Meg. Sure it wouldn't be seen as much today, but just imagine the 50's. My mother told me she wasn't even allowed to wear Jeans because they insinuated a woman with loose morals, and that was the 70's! If she didn't want male attention and for people to call her a whore or slut, then she should have covered up and dressed a bit more respectively. Of course things are different now, but in the context of the time.
So there are some reasons leading me to be suspicious of Meg, that she wasn't all that innocent and I think Ruth knew too.